Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data

The ionospheric response and the associated mechanisms to geomagnetic storms are very complex, particularly during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm. In this paper, the low-latitude ionosphere responses and their coupling mechanisms, during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andres Calabia, Chukwuma Anoruo, Munawar Shah, Christine Amory-Mazaudier, Yury Yasyukevich, Charles Owolabi, Shuanggen Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/4/518
_version_ 1797436957988487168
author Andres Calabia
Chukwuma Anoruo
Munawar Shah
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
Yury Yasyukevich
Charles Owolabi
Shuanggen Jin
author_facet Andres Calabia
Chukwuma Anoruo
Munawar Shah
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
Yury Yasyukevich
Charles Owolabi
Shuanggen Jin
author_sort Andres Calabia
collection DOAJ
description The ionospheric response and the associated mechanisms to geomagnetic storms are very complex, particularly during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm. In this paper, the low-latitude ionosphere responses and their coupling mechanisms, during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm, are investigated from ground-based magnetometers and global navigation satellite system (GNSS), and space weather data. The residual disturbances between the total electron content (TEC) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) global ionospheric maps (GIMs) and empirical models are used to investigate the storm-time ionospheric responses. Three clear sudden storm commencements (SSCs) on 15, 20, and 23 February are detected, and one high speed solar wind (HSSW) event on 19 February is found with the absence of classical SSC features due to a prevalent magnetospheric convection. The IRI-2012 shows insufficient performance, with no distinction between the events and overestimating approximately 20 TEC units (TECU) with respect to the actual quiet-time TEC. Furthermore, the median average of the IGS GIMs TEC during February 2014 shows enhanced values in the southern hemisphere, whereas the IRI-2012 lacks this asymmetry. Three low-latitude profiles extracted from the IGS GIM data revealed up to 20 TECU enhancements in the differential TEC. From these profiles, longer-lasting TEC enhancements are observed at the dip equator profiles than in the profiles of the equatorial ionospheric anomaly (EIA) crests. Moreover, a gradual increase in the global electron content (GEC) shows approximately 1 GEC unit of differential intensification starting from the HSSW event, while the IGS GIM profiles lack this increasing gradient, probably located at higher latitudes. The prompt penetration electric field (PPEF) and equatorial electrojet (EEJ) indices estimated from magnetometer data show strong variability after all four events, except the EEJ’s Asian sector. The low-latitude ionosphere coupling is mainly driven by the variable PPEF, DDEF (disturbance dynamo electric fields), and Joule heating. The auroral electrojet causing eastward PPEF may control the EIA expansion in the Asian sector through the dynamo mechanism, which is also reflected in the solar-quiet current intensity variability.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T11:11:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-729e7a9f2ac04b248fe6c6c0b1050c0f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T11:11:03Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-729e7a9f2ac04b248fe6c6c0b1050c0f2023-12-01T00:45:58ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332022-03-0113451810.3390/atmos13040518Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather DataAndres Calabia0Chukwuma Anoruo1Munawar Shah2Christine Amory-Mazaudier3Yury Yasyukevich4Charles Owolabi5Shuanggen Jin6School of Remote Sensing and Geomantic Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nigeria, Nsukka 400221, NigeriaGNSS and Space Weather Lab, Department of Space Science, National Center of GIS and Space Application, Institute of Space Technology, Islamabad 44000, PakistanSorbonne Université, Ecole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Université Paris Saclay, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas (LPP), 75005 Paris, FranceInstitute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics of Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 664033 Irkutsk, RussiaPhysics Department & Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7320, USASchool of Remote Sensing and Geomantic Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, ChinaThe ionospheric response and the associated mechanisms to geomagnetic storms are very complex, particularly during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm. In this paper, the low-latitude ionosphere responses and their coupling mechanisms, during the February 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm, are investigated from ground-based magnetometers and global navigation satellite system (GNSS), and space weather data. The residual disturbances between the total electron content (TEC) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) global ionospheric maps (GIMs) and empirical models are used to investigate the storm-time ionospheric responses. Three clear sudden storm commencements (SSCs) on 15, 20, and 23 February are detected, and one high speed solar wind (HSSW) event on 19 February is found with the absence of classical SSC features due to a prevalent magnetospheric convection. The IRI-2012 shows insufficient performance, with no distinction between the events and overestimating approximately 20 TEC units (TECU) with respect to the actual quiet-time TEC. Furthermore, the median average of the IGS GIMs TEC during February 2014 shows enhanced values in the southern hemisphere, whereas the IRI-2012 lacks this asymmetry. Three low-latitude profiles extracted from the IGS GIM data revealed up to 20 TECU enhancements in the differential TEC. From these profiles, longer-lasting TEC enhancements are observed at the dip equator profiles than in the profiles of the equatorial ionospheric anomaly (EIA) crests. Moreover, a gradual increase in the global electron content (GEC) shows approximately 1 GEC unit of differential intensification starting from the HSSW event, while the IGS GIM profiles lack this increasing gradient, probably located at higher latitudes. The prompt penetration electric field (PPEF) and equatorial electrojet (EEJ) indices estimated from magnetometer data show strong variability after all four events, except the EEJ’s Asian sector. The low-latitude ionosphere coupling is mainly driven by the variable PPEF, DDEF (disturbance dynamo electric fields), and Joule heating. The auroral electrojet causing eastward PPEF may control the EIA expansion in the Asian sector through the dynamo mechanism, which is also reflected in the solar-quiet current intensity variability.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/4/518ionospheregeomagnetic stormtotal electron content (TEC)global navigation satellite systems (GNSS)space weather
spellingShingle Andres Calabia
Chukwuma Anoruo
Munawar Shah
Christine Amory-Mazaudier
Yury Yasyukevich
Charles Owolabi
Shuanggen Jin
Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data
Atmosphere
ionosphere
geomagnetic storm
total electron content (TEC)
global navigation satellite systems (GNSS)
space weather
title Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data
title_full Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data
title_fullStr Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data
title_full_unstemmed Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data
title_short Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses and Coupling to the February 2014 Multiphase Geomagnetic Storm from GNSS, Magnetometers, and Space Weather Data
title_sort low latitude ionospheric responses and coupling to the february 2014 multiphase geomagnetic storm from gnss magnetometers and space weather data
topic ionosphere
geomagnetic storm
total electron content (TEC)
global navigation satellite systems (GNSS)
space weather
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/4/518
work_keys_str_mv AT andrescalabia lowlatitudeionosphericresponsesandcouplingtothefebruary2014multiphasegeomagneticstormfromgnssmagnetometersandspaceweatherdata
AT chukwumaanoruo lowlatitudeionosphericresponsesandcouplingtothefebruary2014multiphasegeomagneticstormfromgnssmagnetometersandspaceweatherdata
AT munawarshah lowlatitudeionosphericresponsesandcouplingtothefebruary2014multiphasegeomagneticstormfromgnssmagnetometersandspaceweatherdata
AT christineamorymazaudier lowlatitudeionosphericresponsesandcouplingtothefebruary2014multiphasegeomagneticstormfromgnssmagnetometersandspaceweatherdata
AT yuryyasyukevich lowlatitudeionosphericresponsesandcouplingtothefebruary2014multiphasegeomagneticstormfromgnssmagnetometersandspaceweatherdata
AT charlesowolabi lowlatitudeionosphericresponsesandcouplingtothefebruary2014multiphasegeomagneticstormfromgnssmagnetometersandspaceweatherdata
AT shuanggenjin lowlatitudeionosphericresponsesandcouplingtothefebruary2014multiphasegeomagneticstormfromgnssmagnetometersandspaceweatherdata