‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists

Abstract Background Hymen reconstruction (HR) involves the restoration of the hymeneal membrane’s gross anatomical integrity. Among the medical profession, hymen reconstruction receives particular attention and its necessity is debated because the surgery is not medically indicated, and often reveal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Els Leye, Emilomo Ogbe, Maaike Heyerick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:BMC Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z
_version_ 1819263937242202112
author Els Leye
Emilomo Ogbe
Maaike Heyerick
author_facet Els Leye
Emilomo Ogbe
Maaike Heyerick
author_sort Els Leye
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Hymen reconstruction (HR) involves the restoration of the hymeneal membrane’s gross anatomical integrity. Among the medical profession, hymen reconstruction receives particular attention and its necessity is debated because the surgery is not medically indicated, and often reveals conflicting social norms on virginity and marriageability between health professionals and their patients. The focus of this paper is not to address the many open questions that the ethics and politics around HR reveal, but rather aims at contributing to the much-needed empirical evidence. It presents findings of a study conducted in Belgium (Flanders region), among gynaecologists that aimed at assessing their knowledge, views, and experiences on hymen reconstruction. Methods A digital self-administered questionnaire-based survey was sent to Flemish gynaecologists and trainees in Flanders registered with the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG). Results Hundred-and-nine questionnaires were completed. The majority of the respondents (73%) had requests to perform HR. Knowledge and technical skills about HR were considered to be sufficient (69%), even though HR does not seem to be integrated in medical curricula or post-graduate training. Most respondents (72%) would favour the publication of a guideline by their professional organisation. Few respondents discuss alternative options with the patient (19%) and half of the respondents reject to perform HR (49%). The majority of our respondents are against reimbursement of the surgery (70%). Not even half of our respondents believes that a patient is at risk of further violence (47%). 7% of the respondents mentioned complications, but the majority was able to perform a follow up consultation. Conclusions The responses of this survey cannot be generalised to the entire population of gynaecologists in Flanders, but do provide insights in how gynaecologists confronted with HR are approaching such requests, and thus contributes to the empirical evidence. Our paper showed that many Flemish gynaecologist are likely to encounter requests for hymenoplasty, but that a majority would not perform the surgery. There seems to be a lack of guidance and debate in Flanders on the social and moral dimensions of HR, and a number of complexities were revealed when gynaecologists address HR that need further research.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T20:21:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72a6d53a09be4135a3cd8f36fd54f11d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6874
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T20:21:31Z
publishDate 2018-06-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Women's Health
spelling doaj.art-72a6d53a09be4135a3cd8f36fd54f11d2022-12-21T17:32:31ZengBMCBMC Women's Health1472-68742018-06-011811710.1186/s12905-018-0587-z‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologistsEls Leye0Emilomo Ogbe1Maaike Heyerick2International Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent UniversityInternational Centre for Reproductive Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ghent UniversityFaculty of Medicine, Ghent UniversityAbstract Background Hymen reconstruction (HR) involves the restoration of the hymeneal membrane’s gross anatomical integrity. Among the medical profession, hymen reconstruction receives particular attention and its necessity is debated because the surgery is not medically indicated, and often reveals conflicting social norms on virginity and marriageability between health professionals and their patients. The focus of this paper is not to address the many open questions that the ethics and politics around HR reveal, but rather aims at contributing to the much-needed empirical evidence. It presents findings of a study conducted in Belgium (Flanders region), among gynaecologists that aimed at assessing their knowledge, views, and experiences on hymen reconstruction. Methods A digital self-administered questionnaire-based survey was sent to Flemish gynaecologists and trainees in Flanders registered with the Flemish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (VVOG). Results Hundred-and-nine questionnaires were completed. The majority of the respondents (73%) had requests to perform HR. Knowledge and technical skills about HR were considered to be sufficient (69%), even though HR does not seem to be integrated in medical curricula or post-graduate training. Most respondents (72%) would favour the publication of a guideline by their professional organisation. Few respondents discuss alternative options with the patient (19%) and half of the respondents reject to perform HR (49%). The majority of our respondents are against reimbursement of the surgery (70%). Not even half of our respondents believes that a patient is at risk of further violence (47%). 7% of the respondents mentioned complications, but the majority was able to perform a follow up consultation. Conclusions The responses of this survey cannot be generalised to the entire population of gynaecologists in Flanders, but do provide insights in how gynaecologists confronted with HR are approaching such requests, and thus contributes to the empirical evidence. Our paper showed that many Flemish gynaecologist are likely to encounter requests for hymenoplasty, but that a majority would not perform the surgery. There seems to be a lack of guidance and debate in Flanders on the social and moral dimensions of HR, and a number of complexities were revealed when gynaecologists address HR that need further research.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-018-0587-zHymen reconstructionBelgiumGynaecologistsSurvey
spellingShingle Els Leye
Emilomo Ogbe
Maaike Heyerick
‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
BMC Women's Health
Hymen reconstruction
Belgium
Gynaecologists
Survey
title ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_full ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_fullStr ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_full_unstemmed ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_short ‘Doing hymen reconstruction’: an analysis of perceptions and experiences of Flemish gynaecologists
title_sort doing hymen reconstruction an analysis of perceptions and experiences of flemish gynaecologists
topic Hymen reconstruction
Belgium
Gynaecologists
Survey
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12905-018-0587-z
work_keys_str_mv AT elsleye doinghymenreconstructionananalysisofperceptionsandexperiencesofflemishgynaecologists
AT emilomoogbe doinghymenreconstructionananalysisofperceptionsandexperiencesofflemishgynaecologists
AT maaikeheyerick doinghymenreconstructionananalysisofperceptionsandexperiencesofflemishgynaecologists