Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants

Abstract Background Bluetongue (BT) is a disease of concern to animal breeders, so the question on their minds is whether they can predict the risk of the disease before it occurs. The main objective of this study is to enhance the accuracy of BT risk prediction by relying on machine learning (ML) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hagar F. Gouda, Fardos A. M. Hassan, Eman E. El-Araby, Sherif A. Moawed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-11-01
Series:BMC Veterinary Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03486-z
_version_ 1811230370200289280
author Hagar F. Gouda
Fardos A. M. Hassan
Eman E. El-Araby
Sherif A. Moawed
author_facet Hagar F. Gouda
Fardos A. M. Hassan
Eman E. El-Araby
Sherif A. Moawed
author_sort Hagar F. Gouda
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Bluetongue (BT) is a disease of concern to animal breeders, so the question on their minds is whether they can predict the risk of the disease before it occurs. The main objective of this study is to enhance the accuracy of BT risk prediction by relying on machine learning (ML) approaches to help in fulfilling this inquiry. Several risk factors of BT that affect the occurrence and magnitude of animal infection with the virus have been reported globally. Additionally, risk factors, such as sex, age, species, and season, unevenly affect animal health and welfare. Therefore, the seroprevalence study data of 233 apparently healthy animals (125 sheep and 108 goats) from five different provinces in Egypt were used to analyze and compare the performance of the algorithms in predicting BT risk. Results Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and a feedforward artificial neural network (ANN) were used to develop predictive BT risk models and compare their performance to the base model (LR). Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR), precision, and F1 score. The results indicated that RF performed better than other models, with an AUC score of 81%, ANN of 79.6%, and DT of 72.85%. In terms of performance and prediction, LR showed a much lower value (AUC = 69%). Upon further observation of the results, it was discovered that age and season were the most important predictor variables reported in classification and prediction. Conclusion The findings of this study can be utilized to predict and control BT risk factors in sheep and goats, with better diagnostic discrimination in terms of accuracy, TPR, FNR, FPR, and precision of ML models over traditional and commonly used LR models. Our findings advocate that the implementation of ML algorithms, mainly RF, in farm decision making and prediction is a promising technique for analyzing cross-section studies, providing adequate predictive power and significant competence in identifying and ranking predictors representing potential risk factors for BT.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:28:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72a9f48c39564d04a06f5eab4c510aaf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-6148
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:28:21Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Veterinary Research
spelling doaj.art-72a9f48c39564d04a06f5eab4c510aaf2022-12-22T03:36:55ZengBMCBMC Veterinary Research1746-61482022-11-0118111010.1186/s12917-022-03486-zComparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminantsHagar F. Gouda0Fardos A. M. Hassan1Eman E. El-Araby2Sherif A. Moawed3Department of Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig UniversityDepartment of Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig UniversityDepartment of Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig UniversityDepartment of Animal Wealth Development, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Suez Canal UniversityAbstract Background Bluetongue (BT) is a disease of concern to animal breeders, so the question on their minds is whether they can predict the risk of the disease before it occurs. The main objective of this study is to enhance the accuracy of BT risk prediction by relying on machine learning (ML) approaches to help in fulfilling this inquiry. Several risk factors of BT that affect the occurrence and magnitude of animal infection with the virus have been reported globally. Additionally, risk factors, such as sex, age, species, and season, unevenly affect animal health and welfare. Therefore, the seroprevalence study data of 233 apparently healthy animals (125 sheep and 108 goats) from five different provinces in Egypt were used to analyze and compare the performance of the algorithms in predicting BT risk. Results Logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and a feedforward artificial neural network (ANN) were used to develop predictive BT risk models and compare their performance to the base model (LR). Model performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), accuracy, true positive rate (TPR), false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR), precision, and F1 score. The results indicated that RF performed better than other models, with an AUC score of 81%, ANN of 79.6%, and DT of 72.85%. In terms of performance and prediction, LR showed a much lower value (AUC = 69%). Upon further observation of the results, it was discovered that age and season were the most important predictor variables reported in classification and prediction. Conclusion The findings of this study can be utilized to predict and control BT risk factors in sheep and goats, with better diagnostic discrimination in terms of accuracy, TPR, FNR, FPR, and precision of ML models over traditional and commonly used LR models. Our findings advocate that the implementation of ML algorithms, mainly RF, in farm decision making and prediction is a promising technique for analyzing cross-section studies, providing adequate predictive power and significant competence in identifying and ranking predictors representing potential risk factors for BT.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03486-zRandom forestsClassificationVariable importanceMachine learningBluetongueANN
spellingShingle Hagar F. Gouda
Fardos A. M. Hassan
Eman E. El-Araby
Sherif A. Moawed
Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
BMC Veterinary Research
Random forests
Classification
Variable importance
Machine learning
Bluetongue
ANN
title Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_full Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_fullStr Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_short Comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction: a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
title_sort comparison of machine learning models for bluetongue risk prediction a seroprevalence study on small ruminants
topic Random forests
Classification
Variable importance
Machine learning
Bluetongue
ANN
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03486-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hagarfgouda comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants
AT fardosamhassan comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants
AT emaneelaraby comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants
AT sherifamoawed comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforbluetongueriskpredictionaseroprevalencestudyonsmallruminants