Analogijos vaidmuo latvių kalbos asmeninių įvardžių formų raidoje

<p><strong>THE ROLE OF ANALOGY IN THE EVOLUTION OF FORM </strong><strong>IN LATVIAN PERSONAL PRONOUNS</strong></p><p><em>Summary</em></p><p>In the article it is assumed that Latvian personal pronouns have inherited the “classical” cas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Albertas Rosinas
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Vilnius University 2011-12-01
Series:Baltistica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.baltistica.lt/index.php/baltistica/article/view/1581
Description
Summary:<p><strong>THE ROLE OF ANALOGY IN THE EVOLUTION OF FORM </strong><strong>IN LATVIAN PERSONAL PRONOUNS</strong></p><p><em>Summary</em></p><p>In the article it is assumed that Latvian personal pronouns have inherited the “classical” case paradigm from the Lithuanian—Latvian parent language with a well-differentiated inflexion. The great variety of pronominal inflections in Latvian dialects and old manuscripts can be explain­ed by the different conditions affecting the evolution of the language. Word-ending phonological and morphological changes, which created favourable conditions for the so-called changes by anal­ogy, have resulted in morphological modifications in the system of all inflectional words.</p><p>Therefore, the article is concerned with: (a) the process of neutralization of the singular accus­ative and instrumental cases in the <em>() </em><em>о</em><em> </em>and <em>()</em><em>ā</em>-stem paradigms (which occurred after the above-mentioned phonological changes); (b) the effect of neutralization on identical cases of singular personal pronouns; (c) the effect of prepositions, which govern several cases, on the process of neutralization.</p><p>The article also deals with the influence of the accusative-instrumental cases of singular pro­nouns on the modification of the plural pronominal paradigms, and with conditions and variants of the modification in question.</p>On the basis of the data from Latvian dialects and old manuscripts a conclusion can be drawn that the modifications in the personal pronominal paradigms could have begun prior to the written language.
ISSN:0132-6503
2345-0045