The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial

The current Italian regulation defines quite precisely the concept of “copy” and “duplicate” of a digital document however it does not clearly define the concept of “original document”. This causes problems in all those contexts in which it is necessary to exhibit the “original” as evidence as in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberto Guarasci, Anna Rovella, Erika Pasceri, Assunta Caruso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2019-05-01
Series:JLIS.it
Online Access:http://jlis.it/index.php/jlis/article/view/74
_version_ 1797347416769298432
author Roberto Guarasci
Anna Rovella
Erika Pasceri
Assunta Caruso
author_facet Roberto Guarasci
Anna Rovella
Erika Pasceri
Assunta Caruso
author_sort Roberto Guarasci
collection DOAJ
description The current Italian regulation defines quite precisely the concept of “copy” and “duplicate” of a digital document however it does not clearly define the concept of “original document”. This causes problems in all those contexts in which it is necessary to exhibit the “original” as evidence as in the case of interceptions in criminal trials. A starting point for opening studies could be a look to the legislations on this subject in other countries.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:47:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72b23c163733403c9e07b32674a1d030
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2038-1026
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:47:28Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series JLIS.it
spelling doaj.art-72b23c163733403c9e07b32674a1d0302024-01-24T17:48:08ZengFirenze University PressJLIS.it2038-10262019-05-01102The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trialRoberto GuarasciAnna RovellaErika PasceriAssunta CarusoThe current Italian regulation defines quite precisely the concept of “copy” and “duplicate” of a digital document however it does not clearly define the concept of “original document”. This causes problems in all those contexts in which it is necessary to exhibit the “original” as evidence as in the case of interceptions in criminal trials. A starting point for opening studies could be a look to the legislations on this subject in other countries. http://jlis.it/index.php/jlis/article/view/74
spellingShingle Roberto Guarasci
Anna Rovella
Erika Pasceri
Assunta Caruso
The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial
JLIS.it
title The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial
title_full The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial
title_fullStr The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial
title_full_unstemmed The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial
title_short The concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial
title_sort concept of original of a digital document in the interceptions in criminal trial
url http://jlis.it/index.php/jlis/article/view/74
work_keys_str_mv AT robertoguarasci theconceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial
AT annarovella theconceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial
AT erikapasceri theconceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial
AT assuntacaruso theconceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial
AT robertoguarasci conceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial
AT annarovella conceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial
AT erikapasceri conceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial
AT assuntacaruso conceptoforiginalofadigitaldocumentintheinterceptionsincriminaltrial