“They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya

Plain language summary Access to abortion is legally restricted and socially reproved in Kenya. Therefore, women requiring abortion in such restrictive contexts resort to unsafe methods that result in complications, often requiring treatment in health facilities. Nevertheless, there is limited evide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramatou Ouedraogo, Grace Kimemia, Emmy Kageha Igonya, Sherine Athero, Shelmith Wanjiru, Martin Bangha, Kenneth Juma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-02-01
Series:Reproductive Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01580-5
_version_ 1797864562711592960
author Ramatou Ouedraogo
Grace Kimemia
Emmy Kageha Igonya
Sherine Athero
Shelmith Wanjiru
Martin Bangha
Kenneth Juma
author_facet Ramatou Ouedraogo
Grace Kimemia
Emmy Kageha Igonya
Sherine Athero
Shelmith Wanjiru
Martin Bangha
Kenneth Juma
author_sort Ramatou Ouedraogo
collection DOAJ
description Plain language summary Access to abortion is legally restricted and socially reproved in Kenya. Therefore, women requiring abortion in such restrictive contexts resort to unsafe methods that result in complications, often requiring treatment in health facilities. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence on the quality of care provided in public health facilities in Kenya to patients treated for abortion complications. This paper is drawn from a qualitative study targeting 66 women treated for abortion complication in a sample of primary, secondary and tertiary public health facilities in Kenya between November 2018 and February 2019. The interviews focused on the women’s perceptions around the quality of care they received. Our findings show that while the majority of participants stated in first instances that they received “good care” because they left the facility with their medical problem resolved, half of them, when probed, reported delays in receiving care, yet their condition was seen as an emergency since they were bleeding and experiencing pain. Participants also reported instances of abuse (verbal and physical) or lack of privacy during care and inadequate involvement in decisions on the type of care they were to receive. Our findings also point out that providers treated patients differently based on their attributes (spontaneous versus induced abortion, single versus married, young versus older), with women who experienced miscarriages receiving supportive care while women suspected to have induced their abortion being stigmatized. In conclusion, our findings have far reaching implications on efforts to improve post-abortion seeking behaviors and on how to assess quality of abortion care.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:53:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72b867c8f89a4c27b644d354f88b6a76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1742-4755
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:53:54Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Reproductive Health
spelling doaj.art-72b867c8f89a4c27b644d354f88b6a762023-03-22T11:23:32ZengBMCReproductive Health1742-47552023-02-0120111310.1186/s12978-023-01580-5“They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in KenyaRamatou Ouedraogo0Grace Kimemia1Emmy Kageha Igonya2Sherine Athero3Shelmith Wanjiru4Martin Bangha5Kenneth Juma6African Population Health and Research CenterAfrican Population Health and Research CenterAfrican Population Health and Research CenterAfrican Population Health and Research CenterAfrican Population Health and Research CenterAfrican Population Health and Research CenterAfrican Population Health and Research CenterPlain language summary Access to abortion is legally restricted and socially reproved in Kenya. Therefore, women requiring abortion in such restrictive contexts resort to unsafe methods that result in complications, often requiring treatment in health facilities. Nevertheless, there is limited evidence on the quality of care provided in public health facilities in Kenya to patients treated for abortion complications. This paper is drawn from a qualitative study targeting 66 women treated for abortion complication in a sample of primary, secondary and tertiary public health facilities in Kenya between November 2018 and February 2019. The interviews focused on the women’s perceptions around the quality of care they received. Our findings show that while the majority of participants stated in first instances that they received “good care” because they left the facility with their medical problem resolved, half of them, when probed, reported delays in receiving care, yet their condition was seen as an emergency since they were bleeding and experiencing pain. Participants also reported instances of abuse (verbal and physical) or lack of privacy during care and inadequate involvement in decisions on the type of care they were to receive. Our findings also point out that providers treated patients differently based on their attributes (spontaneous versus induced abortion, single versus married, young versus older), with women who experienced miscarriages receiving supportive care while women suspected to have induced their abortion being stigmatized. In conclusion, our findings have far reaching implications on efforts to improve post-abortion seeking behaviors and on how to assess quality of abortion care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01580-5Post-abortion careQuality of carePatientsStigmatizationKenya
spellingShingle Ramatou Ouedraogo
Grace Kimemia
Emmy Kageha Igonya
Sherine Athero
Shelmith Wanjiru
Martin Bangha
Kenneth Juma
“They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya
Reproductive Health
Post-abortion care
Quality of care
Patients
Stigmatization
Kenya
title “They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya
title_full “They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya
title_fullStr “They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya
title_full_unstemmed “They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya
title_short “They talked to me rudely”. Women perspectives on quality of post-abortion care in public health facilities in Kenya
title_sort they talked to me rudely women perspectives on quality of post abortion care in public health facilities in kenya
topic Post-abortion care
Quality of care
Patients
Stigmatization
Kenya
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01580-5
work_keys_str_mv AT ramatououedraogo theytalkedtomerudelywomenperspectivesonqualityofpostabortioncareinpublichealthfacilitiesinkenya
AT gracekimemia theytalkedtomerudelywomenperspectivesonqualityofpostabortioncareinpublichealthfacilitiesinkenya
AT emmykagehaigonya theytalkedtomerudelywomenperspectivesonqualityofpostabortioncareinpublichealthfacilitiesinkenya
AT sherineathero theytalkedtomerudelywomenperspectivesonqualityofpostabortioncareinpublichealthfacilitiesinkenya
AT shelmithwanjiru theytalkedtomerudelywomenperspectivesonqualityofpostabortioncareinpublichealthfacilitiesinkenya
AT martinbangha theytalkedtomerudelywomenperspectivesonqualityofpostabortioncareinpublichealthfacilitiesinkenya
AT kennethjuma theytalkedtomerudelywomenperspectivesonqualityofpostabortioncareinpublichealthfacilitiesinkenya