Process evaluation within pragmatic randomised controlled trials: what is it, why is it done, and can we find it?—a systematic review
Abstract Background Process evaluations are increasingly conducted within pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of health services interventions and provide vital information to enhance understanding of RCT findings. However, issues pertaining to process evaluation in this specific context h...
Main Authors: | Caroline French, Hilary Pinnock, Gordon Forbes, Imogen Skene, Stephanie J. C. Taylor |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-04762-9 |
Similar Items
-
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management
by: Bruno Giraudeau, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Improving the relevance of randomised trials to primary care: a qualitative study investigating views towards pragmatic trials and the PRECIS-2 tool
by: Gordon Forbes, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Undertaking a randomised controlled trial in the police setting: methodological and practical challenges
by: Arabella Scantlebury, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Pragmatism in practice: lessons learned during screening and enrollment for a randomised controlled trial in rural northern Ethiopia
by: Meseret Molla, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Cognitive–behavioural therapy and short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy versus brief psychosocial intervention in adolescents with unipolar major depression (IMPACT): a multicentre, pragmatic, observer-blind, randomised controlled trial
by: Ian M Goodyer, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)