DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and Analysis
While traditional AC mechanical circuit breakers can protect AC circuits, many other DC power distribution technologies, such as DC microgrids (MGs), yield superior disruption performance, e.g., faster and more reliable switching speeds. However, novel DC circuit breaker (DCCB) designs are challengi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-08-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/17/6130 |
_version_ | 1797582605519945728 |
---|---|
author | Mehdi Moradian Tek Tjing Lie Kosala Gunawardane |
author_facet | Mehdi Moradian Tek Tjing Lie Kosala Gunawardane |
author_sort | Mehdi Moradian |
collection | DOAJ |
description | While traditional AC mechanical circuit breakers can protect AC circuits, many other DC power distribution technologies, such as DC microgrids (MGs), yield superior disruption performance, e.g., faster and more reliable switching speeds. However, novel DC circuit breaker (DCCB) designs are challenging due to the need to quickly break high currents within milliseconds, caused by the high fault current rise in DC grids compared to AC grids. In DC grids, the circuit breaker must not provide any current crossing and must absorb surges, since the arc is not naturally extinguished by the system. Additionally, the DC breaker must mitigate the magnetic energy stored in the system inductance and withstand residual overvoltages after current interruption. These challenges require a fundamentally different topology for DCCBs, which are typically made using solid-state semiconductor technology, metal oxide varistors (MOVs), and ultra-fast switches. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the development, design, and performance of DCCBs and an analysis of internal topology, the energy absorption path, and subcircuits in solid-state (SS)-based DCCBs. The research explores various novel designs that introduce different structures for an energy dissipation solution. The classification of these designs is based on the fundamental principles of surge mitigation and a detailed analysis of the techniques employed in DCCBs. In addition, our framework offers an advantageous reference point for the future evolution of SS circuit breakers in numerous developing power delivery systems. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T23:24:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-72c4b46de0574bb48bc092d171067bf4 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1073 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T23:24:43Z |
publishDate | 2023-08-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Energies |
spelling | doaj.art-72c4b46de0574bb48bc092d171067bf42023-11-19T08:03:42ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-08-011617613010.3390/en16176130DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and AnalysisMehdi Moradian0Tek Tjing Lie1Kosala Gunawardane2Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New ZealandDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland 1010, New ZealandDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo 2007, AustraliaWhile traditional AC mechanical circuit breakers can protect AC circuits, many other DC power distribution technologies, such as DC microgrids (MGs), yield superior disruption performance, e.g., faster and more reliable switching speeds. However, novel DC circuit breaker (DCCB) designs are challenging due to the need to quickly break high currents within milliseconds, caused by the high fault current rise in DC grids compared to AC grids. In DC grids, the circuit breaker must not provide any current crossing and must absorb surges, since the arc is not naturally extinguished by the system. Additionally, the DC breaker must mitigate the magnetic energy stored in the system inductance and withstand residual overvoltages after current interruption. These challenges require a fundamentally different topology for DCCBs, which are typically made using solid-state semiconductor technology, metal oxide varistors (MOVs), and ultra-fast switches. This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the development, design, and performance of DCCBs and an analysis of internal topology, the energy absorption path, and subcircuits in solid-state (SS)-based DCCBs. The research explores various novel designs that introduce different structures for an energy dissipation solution. The classification of these designs is based on the fundamental principles of surge mitigation and a detailed analysis of the techniques employed in DCCBs. In addition, our framework offers an advantageous reference point for the future evolution of SS circuit breakers in numerous developing power delivery systems.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/17/6130DC circuit breakermechanical DCCBsloid-state DCCBhybrid DCCBDC microgridsDC circuit breaker topology |
spellingShingle | Mehdi Moradian Tek Tjing Lie Kosala Gunawardane DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and Analysis Energies DC circuit breaker mechanical DCCB sloid-state DCCB hybrid DCCB DC microgrids DC circuit breaker topology |
title | DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and Analysis |
title_full | DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and Analysis |
title_fullStr | DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and Analysis |
title_short | DC Circuit Breaker Evolution, Design, and Analysis |
title_sort | dc circuit breaker evolution design and analysis |
topic | DC circuit breaker mechanical DCCB sloid-state DCCB hybrid DCCB DC microgrids DC circuit breaker topology |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/17/6130 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mehdimoradian dccircuitbreakerevolutiondesignandanalysis AT tektjinglie dccircuitbreakerevolutiondesignandanalysis AT kosalagunawardane dccircuitbreakerevolutiondesignandanalysis |