Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming Process

Individuals naturally carry bacteria and other microbes as part of their natural flora, with some being opportunistic pathogens. Approximately 30% of the population is known to carry <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in their nasal cavity, an organism that causes infections ranging from soft...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedict Uy, Simon Swift, Francesca Casu, David Mahuika, Maurice A. Curtis, Deborah Prendergast
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/11/2180
_version_ 1797467180070076416
author Benedict Uy
Simon Swift
Francesca Casu
David Mahuika
Maurice A. Curtis
Deborah Prendergast
author_facet Benedict Uy
Simon Swift
Francesca Casu
David Mahuika
Maurice A. Curtis
Deborah Prendergast
author_sort Benedict Uy
collection DOAJ
description Individuals naturally carry bacteria and other microbes as part of their natural flora, with some being opportunistic pathogens. Approximately 30% of the population is known to carry <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in their nasal cavity, an organism that causes infections ranging from soft tissue abscesses to toxic shock syndrome. This problem is compounded by the presence of antibiotic-resistant strains such as Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). Commensal bacteria present on cadavers pose a risk to those who handle the body. As a Medical School Anatomy laboratory that performs hands-on cadaveric dissection, we wanted to know whether the embalming process is sufficient to kill all commensal bacteria that pose a risk to staff and students. Even if these strains do not cause disease in these individuals, secondary transmission could occur to friends and family, who may be at higher risk of acquiring an infection. Embalming is assumed to eliminate all microbial contamination on the body. However, there are limited studies to confirm this. This study characterises the incidence of antibiotic sensitive and resistant bacteria in cadavers donated for medical teaching and research. We have screened for Methicillin-Resistant Organisms (MRO) and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria. In this study group of cadavers, approximately 46% (16/35) carry an MRO, while 51% (18/35) carry an ESBL positive organism prior to embalming. By determining the organisms’ presence pre- and post-embalming, we can evaluate the embalming procedure’s effectiveness. Our results show embalming eliminates detectable microbes in about 51% (18/35) of the cadavers. MRO dropped by 75% (16 to 4 positive cadavers), while ESBL organisms went down by almost 95% (from 18 to 1 positive cadaver). There was a further decrease in the number of positive cadavers after storage at 4 °C to 6% (2/32). Thus, although the embalming process does not immediately sterilise all the cadavers, prolonged storage at 4 °C can further reduce the number of viable bacteria.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:49:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72ce6cc5f1384f93bbb1ebaa1761a643
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2607
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:49:58Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj.art-72ce6cc5f1384f93bbb1ebaa1761a6432023-11-24T05:57:02ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072022-11-011011218010.3390/microorganisms10112180Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming ProcessBenedict Uy0Simon Swift1Francesca Casu2David Mahuika3Maurice A. Curtis4Deborah Prendergast5School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New ZealandSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New ZealandHealth, Safety and Wellbeing, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New ZealandDepartment of Anatomy and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New ZealandSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New ZealandSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, 85 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New ZealandIndividuals naturally carry bacteria and other microbes as part of their natural flora, with some being opportunistic pathogens. Approximately 30% of the population is known to carry <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> in their nasal cavity, an organism that causes infections ranging from soft tissue abscesses to toxic shock syndrome. This problem is compounded by the presence of antibiotic-resistant strains such as Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). Commensal bacteria present on cadavers pose a risk to those who handle the body. As a Medical School Anatomy laboratory that performs hands-on cadaveric dissection, we wanted to know whether the embalming process is sufficient to kill all commensal bacteria that pose a risk to staff and students. Even if these strains do not cause disease in these individuals, secondary transmission could occur to friends and family, who may be at higher risk of acquiring an infection. Embalming is assumed to eliminate all microbial contamination on the body. However, there are limited studies to confirm this. This study characterises the incidence of antibiotic sensitive and resistant bacteria in cadavers donated for medical teaching and research. We have screened for Methicillin-Resistant Organisms (MRO) and Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria. In this study group of cadavers, approximately 46% (16/35) carry an MRO, while 51% (18/35) carry an ESBL positive organism prior to embalming. By determining the organisms’ presence pre- and post-embalming, we can evaluate the embalming procedure’s effectiveness. Our results show embalming eliminates detectable microbes in about 51% (18/35) of the cadavers. MRO dropped by 75% (16 to 4 positive cadavers), while ESBL organisms went down by almost 95% (from 18 to 1 positive cadaver). There was a further decrease in the number of positive cadavers after storage at 4 °C to 6% (2/32). Thus, although the embalming process does not immediately sterilise all the cadavers, prolonged storage at 4 °C can further reduce the number of viable bacteria.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/11/2180embalmingmicrobial contaminationantimicrobialdrug-resistant bacteria
spellingShingle Benedict Uy
Simon Swift
Francesca Casu
David Mahuika
Maurice A. Curtis
Deborah Prendergast
Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming Process
Microorganisms
embalming
microbial contamination
antimicrobial
drug-resistant bacteria
title Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming Process
title_full Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming Process
title_fullStr Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming Process
title_full_unstemmed Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming Process
title_short Dealing with Hidden Threats: The Antimicrobial Effect of the Embalming Process
title_sort dealing with hidden threats the antimicrobial effect of the embalming process
topic embalming
microbial contamination
antimicrobial
drug-resistant bacteria
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/11/2180
work_keys_str_mv AT benedictuy dealingwithhiddenthreatstheantimicrobialeffectoftheembalmingprocess
AT simonswift dealingwithhiddenthreatstheantimicrobialeffectoftheembalmingprocess
AT francescacasu dealingwithhiddenthreatstheantimicrobialeffectoftheembalmingprocess
AT davidmahuika dealingwithhiddenthreatstheantimicrobialeffectoftheembalmingprocess
AT mauriceacurtis dealingwithhiddenthreatstheantimicrobialeffectoftheembalmingprocess
AT deborahprendergast dealingwithhiddenthreatstheantimicrobialeffectoftheembalmingprocess