Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the Holocene

An earth system model of intermediate complexity (CLIMate and BiosphERe – CLIMBER-2) and a land surface model (JSBACH), which dynamically represent vegetation, are used to simulate natural fire dynamics through the last 8000 yr. Output variables of the fire model (burned area and fire carbon emissio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Brücher, V. Brovkin, S. Kloster, J. R. Marlon, M. J. Power
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-04-01
Series:Climate of the Past
Online Access:http://www.clim-past.net/10/811/2014/cp-10-811-2014.pdf
_version_ 1818562499730997248
author T. Brücher
V. Brovkin
S. Kloster
J. R. Marlon
M. J. Power
author_facet T. Brücher
V. Brovkin
S. Kloster
J. R. Marlon
M. J. Power
author_sort T. Brücher
collection DOAJ
description An earth system model of intermediate complexity (CLIMate and BiosphERe – CLIMBER-2) and a land surface model (JSBACH), which dynamically represent vegetation, are used to simulate natural fire dynamics through the last 8000 yr. Output variables of the fire model (burned area and fire carbon emissions) are used to compare model results with sediment-based charcoal reconstructions. Several approaches for processing model output are also tested. Charcoal data are reported in <i>Z</i>-scores with a base period of 8000–200 BP in order to exclude the strong anthropogenic forcing of fire during the last two centuries. The model–data comparison reveals a robust correspondence in fire activity for most regions considered, while for a few regions, such as Europe, simulated and observed fire histories show different trends. The difference between modelled and observed fire activity may be due to the absence of anthropogenic forcing (e.g. human ignitions and suppression) in the model simulations, and also due to limitations inherent to modelling fire dynamics. The use of spatial averaging (or <i>Z</i>-score processing) of model output did not change the directions of the trends. However, <i>Z</i>-score-transformed model output resulted in higher rank correlations with the charcoal <i>Z</i>-scores in most regions. Therefore, while both metrics are useful, processing model output as <i>Z</i>-scores is preferable to areal averaging when comparing model results to transformed charcoal records.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T01:04:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72df7b9bdb4d4c92a75492cb41840c0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1814-9324
1814-9332
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T01:04:33Z
publishDate 2014-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Climate of the Past
spelling doaj.art-72df7b9bdb4d4c92a75492cb41840c0a2022-12-21T23:23:03ZengCopernicus PublicationsClimate of the Past1814-93241814-93322014-04-0110281182410.5194/cp-10-811-2014Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the HoloceneT. Brücher0V. Brovkin1S. Kloster2J. R. Marlon3M. J. Power4Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, GermanySchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USANatural History Museum of Utah, Department of Geography, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USAAn earth system model of intermediate complexity (CLIMate and BiosphERe – CLIMBER-2) and a land surface model (JSBACH), which dynamically represent vegetation, are used to simulate natural fire dynamics through the last 8000 yr. Output variables of the fire model (burned area and fire carbon emissions) are used to compare model results with sediment-based charcoal reconstructions. Several approaches for processing model output are also tested. Charcoal data are reported in <i>Z</i>-scores with a base period of 8000–200 BP in order to exclude the strong anthropogenic forcing of fire during the last two centuries. The model–data comparison reveals a robust correspondence in fire activity for most regions considered, while for a few regions, such as Europe, simulated and observed fire histories show different trends. The difference between modelled and observed fire activity may be due to the absence of anthropogenic forcing (e.g. human ignitions and suppression) in the model simulations, and also due to limitations inherent to modelling fire dynamics. The use of spatial averaging (or <i>Z</i>-score processing) of model output did not change the directions of the trends. However, <i>Z</i>-score-transformed model output resulted in higher rank correlations with the charcoal <i>Z</i>-scores in most regions. Therefore, while both metrics are useful, processing model output as <i>Z</i>-scores is preferable to areal averaging when comparing model results to transformed charcoal records.http://www.clim-past.net/10/811/2014/cp-10-811-2014.pdf
spellingShingle T. Brücher
V. Brovkin
S. Kloster
J. R. Marlon
M. J. Power
Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the Holocene
Climate of the Past
title Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the Holocene
title_full Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the Holocene
title_fullStr Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the Holocene
title_full_unstemmed Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the Holocene
title_short Comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the Holocene
title_sort comparing modelled fire dynamics with charcoal records for the holocene
url http://www.clim-past.net/10/811/2014/cp-10-811-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tbrucher comparingmodelledfiredynamicswithcharcoalrecordsfortheholocene
AT vbrovkin comparingmodelledfiredynamicswithcharcoalrecordsfortheholocene
AT skloster comparingmodelledfiredynamicswithcharcoalrecordsfortheholocene
AT jrmarlon comparingmodelledfiredynamicswithcharcoalrecordsfortheholocene
AT mjpower comparingmodelledfiredynamicswithcharcoalrecordsfortheholocene