Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China

Flood management is a complex issue in Chinese cities that exhibit high populations and have undergone rapid urbanization. Urban flood management (UFM) approaches can be used to mitigate urban flood risk. To address urban issues of poor water quality and urban surface flooding, the Sponge City Progr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yunfei Qi, Faith Ka Shun Chan, James Griffiths, Meili Feng, Yanfang Sang, Emily O’Donnell, Michael Hutchins, Dimple R. Thadani, Gang Li, Mengqi Shao, Linjun Xie, Sitong Liu, Chunguang Zhang, Xinan Li, Lingyun Liu, Ming Zhong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/19/2784
_version_ 1797515659197808640
author Yunfei Qi
Faith Ka Shun Chan
James Griffiths
Meili Feng
Yanfang Sang
Emily O’Donnell
Michael Hutchins
Dimple R. Thadani
Gang Li
Mengqi Shao
Linjun Xie
Sitong Liu
Chunguang Zhang
Xinan Li
Lingyun Liu
Ming Zhong
author_facet Yunfei Qi
Faith Ka Shun Chan
James Griffiths
Meili Feng
Yanfang Sang
Emily O’Donnell
Michael Hutchins
Dimple R. Thadani
Gang Li
Mengqi Shao
Linjun Xie
Sitong Liu
Chunguang Zhang
Xinan Li
Lingyun Liu
Ming Zhong
author_sort Yunfei Qi
collection DOAJ
description Flood management is a complex issue in Chinese cities that exhibit high populations and have undergone rapid urbanization. Urban flood management (UFM) approaches can be used to mitigate urban flood risk. To address urban issues of poor water quality and urban surface flooding, the Sponge City Program (SCP) was initiated in 2013 in China. The SCP aims to provide an opportunity for Chinese cities to improve their current UFM practices. This study looks at Guiyang (a pilot sponge city located in SW China) as a case study to identify the challenges and opportunities of UFM in China. Guiyang is a valley city surrounded by a hilly landscape. Using interview records and flood data, we illustrate that the primary type of flood in Guiyang is fluvial rather than surface water flooding. In Guiyang, the current function and targets of the SCP have yet to engage with the catchment level flood management, instead mainly focusing on the site-specific context (i.e., community level). Catchment flood management planning (CFMP) and natural flood management (NFM) both address this problem and may be a more suitable approach to manage flood discharge from the upper and middle catchments in Guiyang. In addition, it is suggested that a mixed option combining “hard” infrastructure (e.g., reservoirs and floodwalls) with “soft” flood management measures (e.g., improving people awareness and participation) may improve urban flood resilience in Chinese cities.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T06:48:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72e1957369584d9d885878a045f71498
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T06:48:13Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-72e1957369584d9d885878a045f714982023-11-22T17:02:41ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412021-10-011319278410.3390/w13192784Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW ChinaYunfei Qi0Faith Ka Shun Chan1James Griffiths2Meili Feng3Yanfang Sang4Emily O’Donnell5Michael Hutchins6Dimple R. Thadani7Gang Li8Mengqi Shao9Linjun Xie10Sitong Liu11Chunguang Zhang12Xinan Li13Lingyun Liu14Ming Zhong15School of Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, ChinaSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, ChinaNational Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Christchurch 8602, New ZealandSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UKUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Benson Lane, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxford OX10 8BB, UKNottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, ChinaInstitute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, ChinaFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (FHSS), University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, ChinaDepartment of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, ChinaSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo 315100, ChinaGuizhou Water & Power Survey—Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, ChinaGuizhou Water & Power Survey—Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, ChinaGuizhou Water & Power Survey—Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, ChinaGuizhou Water & Power Survey—Design Institute Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, ChinaFlood management is a complex issue in Chinese cities that exhibit high populations and have undergone rapid urbanization. Urban flood management (UFM) approaches can be used to mitigate urban flood risk. To address urban issues of poor water quality and urban surface flooding, the Sponge City Program (SCP) was initiated in 2013 in China. The SCP aims to provide an opportunity for Chinese cities to improve their current UFM practices. This study looks at Guiyang (a pilot sponge city located in SW China) as a case study to identify the challenges and opportunities of UFM in China. Guiyang is a valley city surrounded by a hilly landscape. Using interview records and flood data, we illustrate that the primary type of flood in Guiyang is fluvial rather than surface water flooding. In Guiyang, the current function and targets of the SCP have yet to engage with the catchment level flood management, instead mainly focusing on the site-specific context (i.e., community level). Catchment flood management planning (CFMP) and natural flood management (NFM) both address this problem and may be a more suitable approach to manage flood discharge from the upper and middle catchments in Guiyang. In addition, it is suggested that a mixed option combining “hard” infrastructure (e.g., reservoirs and floodwalls) with “soft” flood management measures (e.g., improving people awareness and participation) may improve urban flood resilience in Chinese cities.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/19/2784catchment flood management plan (CFMP)urban flood management (UFM)natural flood management (NFM)Sponge City Program (SCP)urban flood resilienceGuiyang
spellingShingle Yunfei Qi
Faith Ka Shun Chan
James Griffiths
Meili Feng
Yanfang Sang
Emily O’Donnell
Michael Hutchins
Dimple R. Thadani
Gang Li
Mengqi Shao
Linjun Xie
Sitong Liu
Chunguang Zhang
Xinan Li
Lingyun Liu
Ming Zhong
Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China
Water
catchment flood management plan (CFMP)
urban flood management (UFM)
natural flood management (NFM)
Sponge City Program (SCP)
urban flood resilience
Guiyang
title Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China
title_full Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China
title_fullStr Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China
title_full_unstemmed Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China
title_short Sponge City Program (SCP) and Urban Flood Management (UFM)—The Case of Guiyang, SW China
title_sort sponge city program scp and urban flood management ufm the case of guiyang sw china
topic catchment flood management plan (CFMP)
urban flood management (UFM)
natural flood management (NFM)
Sponge City Program (SCP)
urban flood resilience
Guiyang
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/19/2784
work_keys_str_mv AT yunfeiqi spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT faithkashunchan spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT jamesgriffiths spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT meilifeng spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT yanfangsang spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT emilyodonnell spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT michaelhutchins spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT dimplerthadani spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT gangli spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT mengqishao spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT linjunxie spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT sitongliu spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT chunguangzhang spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT xinanli spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT lingyunliu spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina
AT mingzhong spongecityprogramscpandurbanfloodmanagementufmthecaseofguiyangswchina