Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy

Rationale: Insular epilepsy can be a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping semiology and scalp EEG findings with frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe epilepsies. Stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) provides an opportunity to better localize seizure onset. The possibility of improved locali...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathaniel Cameron, Lane Fry, Jean-Luc Kabangu, Bryan A. Schatmeyer, Christopher Miller, Carol M. Ulloa, Utku Uysal, Jennifer J. Cheng, Michael J. Kinsman, Adam G. Rouse, Patrick Landazuri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-07-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023054920
_version_ 1797771434396745728
author Nathaniel Cameron
Lane Fry
Jean-Luc Kabangu
Bryan A. Schatmeyer
Christopher Miller
Carol M. Ulloa
Utku Uysal
Jennifer J. Cheng
Michael J. Kinsman
Adam G. Rouse
Patrick Landazuri
author_facet Nathaniel Cameron
Lane Fry
Jean-Luc Kabangu
Bryan A. Schatmeyer
Christopher Miller
Carol M. Ulloa
Utku Uysal
Jennifer J. Cheng
Michael J. Kinsman
Adam G. Rouse
Patrick Landazuri
author_sort Nathaniel Cameron
collection DOAJ
description Rationale: Insular epilepsy can be a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping semiology and scalp EEG findings with frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe epilepsies. Stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) provides an opportunity to better localize seizure onset. The possibility of improved localization is balanced by implantation risk in this vascularly rich anatomic region. We review both safety and pre-implantation factors involved in insular electrode placement across four years at an academic medical center. Methods: Presurgical data, operative reports, and invasive EEG summaries were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing invasive epilepsy monitoring on the insula from 2016 through 2019. EEG reports were reviewed to record the presence of insula ictal and interictal involvement. We recorded which presurgical findings suggested insular involvement (insula lesion on MRI, insula changes on PET/SPECT/scalp EEG, characteristic semiology, or history of failed anterior temporal lobectomy). The likelihood of pre-sEEG insular onset was categorized as low suspicion if no presurgical findings were present (“rule out”), moderate suspicion if one finding was present, and high suspicion if two or more findings were present. Results: 76 patients received 189 insular electrodes as part of their implantation strategy for 79 surgical cases. Seven patients (8.9%) had insular ictal onset. One clinically significant complication (left hemiparesis) occurred in a patient with moderate suspicion for insular onset. There were 38 low suspicion cases, 36 moderate suspicion cases, and 5 high suspicion cases for pre-sEEG insula ictal onset. Two low suspicion (5.3%), three moderate suspicion (8.6%), and two high suspicion (40%) cases had insular ictal onset. Conclusions: The insula can safely receive sEEG. Having two or more presurgical factors indicating insular onset is a strong, albeit incomplete, predictor of insular seizure onset. Using pre-implantation clinical findings can offer clinicians predictive value for targeting the insula during invasive EEG monitoring.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T21:36:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72e3a64f21fb4fb786d3dea78398dfa3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T21:36:29Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-72e3a64f21fb4fb786d3dea78398dfa32023-07-27T05:59:09ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-07-0197e18284Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategyNathaniel Cameron0Lane Fry1Jean-Luc Kabangu2Bryan A. Schatmeyer3Christopher Miller4Carol M. Ulloa5Utku Uysal6Jennifer J. Cheng7Michael J. Kinsman8Adam G. Rouse9Patrick Landazuri10Dept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United StatesDept. of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States; Dept. of Cell Biology & Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States; Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Kansas, United StatesDept. of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, United States; Corresponding author. 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Mailstop 3021, Kansas City, KS 66160, United States.Rationale: Insular epilepsy can be a challenging diagnosis due to overlapping semiology and scalp EEG findings with frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe epilepsies. Stereotactic electroencephalography (sEEG) provides an opportunity to better localize seizure onset. The possibility of improved localization is balanced by implantation risk in this vascularly rich anatomic region. We review both safety and pre-implantation factors involved in insular electrode placement across four years at an academic medical center. Methods: Presurgical data, operative reports, and invasive EEG summaries were retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing invasive epilepsy monitoring on the insula from 2016 through 2019. EEG reports were reviewed to record the presence of insula ictal and interictal involvement. We recorded which presurgical findings suggested insular involvement (insula lesion on MRI, insula changes on PET/SPECT/scalp EEG, characteristic semiology, or history of failed anterior temporal lobectomy). The likelihood of pre-sEEG insular onset was categorized as low suspicion if no presurgical findings were present (“rule out”), moderate suspicion if one finding was present, and high suspicion if two or more findings were present. Results: 76 patients received 189 insular electrodes as part of their implantation strategy for 79 surgical cases. Seven patients (8.9%) had insular ictal onset. One clinically significant complication (left hemiparesis) occurred in a patient with moderate suspicion for insular onset. There were 38 low suspicion cases, 36 moderate suspicion cases, and 5 high suspicion cases for pre-sEEG insula ictal onset. Two low suspicion (5.3%), three moderate suspicion (8.6%), and two high suspicion (40%) cases had insular ictal onset. Conclusions: The insula can safely receive sEEG. Having two or more presurgical factors indicating insular onset is a strong, albeit incomplete, predictor of insular seizure onset. Using pre-implantation clinical findings can offer clinicians predictive value for targeting the insula during invasive EEG monitoring.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023054920InsulasEEGSafetyIctal-onset
spellingShingle Nathaniel Cameron
Lane Fry
Jean-Luc Kabangu
Bryan A. Schatmeyer
Christopher Miller
Carol M. Ulloa
Utku Uysal
Jennifer J. Cheng
Michael J. Kinsman
Adam G. Rouse
Patrick Landazuri
Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy
Heliyon
Insula
sEEG
Safety
Ictal-onset
title Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy
title_full Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy
title_fullStr Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy
title_full_unstemmed Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy
title_short Using pre-surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy
title_sort using pre surgical suspicion to guide insula implantation strategy
topic Insula
sEEG
Safety
Ictal-onset
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023054920
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanielcameron usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT lanefry usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT jeanluckabangu usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT bryanaschatmeyer usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT christophermiller usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT carolmulloa usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT utkuuysal usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT jenniferjcheng usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT michaeljkinsman usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT adamgrouse usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy
AT patricklandazuri usingpresurgicalsuspiciontoguideinsulaimplantationstrategy