YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKI

In practice, The Supreme Court takes the factors in consideration such as child’s age, school period, child’s health, the parties working conditions, place of settlement, annual leaves, health of parents who wants to have relation with the child, social enviroment, and remoteness of settlement place...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fulya ERLÜLE
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Inonu University 2018-12-01
Series:İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/573715
_version_ 1797913398040592384
author Fulya ERLÜLE
author_facet Fulya ERLÜLE
author_sort Fulya ERLÜLE
collection DOAJ
description In practice, The Supreme Court takes the factors in consideration such as child’s age, school period, child’s health, the parties working conditions, place of settlement, annual leaves, health of parents who wants to have relation with the child, social enviroment, and remoteness of settlement places etc. in order to determine the content of right of custody. The distance between parties’ residences is also taken into account by the Supreme Court. One of the major problem after divorcement is the right of visiting a child to the party who has not been given custody. According to TUIK’s 2016 data, 109,978 children has been affected from divorce decision and % 28 of the divorcees got at least one child’s custody. Research related to the effect of divorcement on child’s psychology has shown that the most destructive effect of divorcement to the child’s psychology is, the termination of the personal relation with one of the parent. Accordingly, the relation between the child and the party who has not been given custody shall be regulated according to the best interest of a child. Restricted time for the relation with the child or spread of time to large period is considered as not suitable for personal relations. Accordingly, Constitutional Court’s personal application 07.05.2015 dated decision held that, narrow visiting time and restriction of personal relation is deemed to be an intervention to applicant’s family life and is contrary to Art.20 of the Constitution.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T12:11:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72ed9dfc473746b8874dfe82b276f0b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2146-1082
2667-5714
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-10T12:11:26Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Inonu University
record_format Article
series İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-72ed9dfc473746b8874dfe82b276f0b72023-02-15T16:15:58ZdeuInonu Universityİnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi2146-10822667-57142018-12-0192259284https://doi.org/10.21492/inuhfd.468697YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKIFulya ERLÜLE https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5683-6523In practice, The Supreme Court takes the factors in consideration such as child’s age, school period, child’s health, the parties working conditions, place of settlement, annual leaves, health of parents who wants to have relation with the child, social enviroment, and remoteness of settlement places etc. in order to determine the content of right of custody. The distance between parties’ residences is also taken into account by the Supreme Court. One of the major problem after divorcement is the right of visiting a child to the party who has not been given custody. According to TUIK’s 2016 data, 109,978 children has been affected from divorce decision and % 28 of the divorcees got at least one child’s custody. Research related to the effect of divorcement on child’s psychology has shown that the most destructive effect of divorcement to the child’s psychology is, the termination of the personal relation with one of the parent. Accordingly, the relation between the child and the party who has not been given custody shall be regulated according to the best interest of a child. Restricted time for the relation with the child or spread of time to large period is considered as not suitable for personal relations. Accordingly, Constitutional Court’s personal application 07.05.2015 dated decision held that, narrow visiting time and restriction of personal relation is deemed to be an intervention to applicant’s family life and is contrary to Art.20 of the Constitution.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/573715divorcementright of custodythe right of visitingthe right of respect to the family lifeestablishing a personal relation with the childthe best interest of a child
spellingShingle Fulya ERLÜLE
YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKI
İnönü Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi
divorcement
right of custody
the right of visiting
the right of respect to the family life
establishing a personal relation with the child
the best interest of a child
title YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKI
title_full YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKI
title_fullStr YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKI
title_full_unstemmed YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKI
title_short YARGITAY KARARLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE VELAYETİN KULLANILMASI KENDİSİNE BIRAKILMAYAN TARAFIN ÇOCUĞU ZİYARET HAKKI
title_sort yargitay kararlari cercevesinde velayetin kullanilmasi kendisine birakilmayan tarafin cocugu ziyaret hakki
topic divorcement
right of custody
the right of visiting
the right of respect to the family life
establishing a personal relation with the child
the best interest of a child
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/573715
work_keys_str_mv AT fulyaerlule yargitaykararlaricercevesindevelayetinkullanilmasikendisinebirakilmayantarafincocuguziyarethakki