_version_ 1797904016472014848
author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Fernando Alvarez
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Jorge Borroto
Alba Brancato
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Anna Federica Castoldi
Arianna Chiusolo
Angelo Colagiorgi
Mathilde Colas
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Varvara Gouliarmou
Franco Ferilli
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Aude Kienzler
Roberto Lava
Renata Leuschner
Alberto Linguadoca
Christopher Lythgo
Oriol Magrans
Iris Mangas
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Miguel Santos
Rositsa Serafimova
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Manuela Tiramani
Benedicte Vagenende
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
author_facet European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Fernando Alvarez
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Jorge Borroto
Alba Brancato
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Anna Federica Castoldi
Arianna Chiusolo
Angelo Colagiorgi
Mathilde Colas
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Varvara Gouliarmou
Franco Ferilli
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Aude Kienzler
Roberto Lava
Renata Leuschner
Alberto Linguadoca
Christopher Lythgo
Oriol Magrans
Iris Mangas
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Miguel Santos
Rositsa Serafimova
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Manuela Tiramani
Benedicte Vagenende
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
author_sort European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic and co‐rapporteur Member State France for the pesticide active substance fish oil and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of fish oil as a game repellent on deciduous and coniferous trees in forestry. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T09:42:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72f3b10f79a543c285373f98e71378a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1831-4732
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T09:42:07Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj.art-72f3b10f79a543c285373f98e71378a82023-02-17T06:41:45ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322022-01-01201n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7079Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oilEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Fernando AlvarezMaria ArenaDomenica AuteriJorge BorrotoAlba BrancatoLuis Carrasco CabreraAnna Federica CastoldiArianna ChiusoloAngelo ColagiorgiMathilde ColasFederica CrivellenteChloe De LentdeckerMark EgsmoseGabriella FaitVarvara GouliarmouFranco FerilliLuna GrecoAlessio IppolitoFrederique IstaceSamira JarrahDimitra KardassiAude KienzlerRoberto LavaRenata LeuschnerAlberto LinguadocaChristopher LythgoOriol MagransIris MangasIleana MironTunde MolnarLaura PadovaniJuan Manuel Parra MorteRagnor PedersenHermine ReichMiguel SantosRositsa SerafimovaRachel SharpCsaba SzentesAndrea TerronManuela TiramaniBenedicte VagenendeLaura Villamar‐BouzaAbstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State the Czech Republic and co‐rapporteur Member State France for the pesticide active substance fish oil and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of fish oil as a game repellent on deciduous and coniferous trees in forestry. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7079fish oilpeer reviewrisk assessmentpesticidegame repellent
spellingShingle European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Fernando Alvarez
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Jorge Borroto
Alba Brancato
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Anna Federica Castoldi
Arianna Chiusolo
Angelo Colagiorgi
Mathilde Colas
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Varvara Gouliarmou
Franco Ferilli
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Aude Kienzler
Roberto Lava
Renata Leuschner
Alberto Linguadoca
Christopher Lythgo
Oriol Magrans
Iris Mangas
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Miguel Santos
Rositsa Serafimova
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Manuela Tiramani
Benedicte Vagenende
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oil
EFSA Journal
fish oil
peer review
risk assessment
pesticide
game repellent
title Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oil
title_full Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oil
title_fullStr Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oil
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oil
title_short Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oil
title_sort peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fish oil
topic fish oil
peer review
risk assessment
pesticide
game repellent
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7079
work_keys_str_mv AT europeanfoodsafetyauthorityefsa peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT fernandoalvarez peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT mariaarena peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT domenicaauteri peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT jorgeborroto peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT albabrancato peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT luiscarrascocabrera peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT annafedericacastoldi peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT ariannachiusolo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT angelocolagiorgi peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT mathildecolas peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT federicacrivellente peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT chloedelentdecker peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT markegsmose peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT gabriellafait peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT varvaragouliarmou peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT francoferilli peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT lunagreco peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT alessioippolito peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT frederiqueistace peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT samirajarrah peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT dimitrakardassi peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT audekienzler peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT robertolava peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT renataleuschner peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT albertolinguadoca peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT christopherlythgo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT oriolmagrans peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT irismangas peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT ileanamiron peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT tundemolnar peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT laurapadovani peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT juanmanuelparramorte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT ragnorpedersen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT herminereich peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT miguelsantos peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT rositsaserafimova peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT rachelsharp peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT csabaszentes peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT andreaterron peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT manuelatiramani peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT benedictevagenende peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil
AT lauravillamarbouza peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstancefishoil