Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, Ecuador

<p>Greenspaces within broader ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) strategies provide multiple benefits to society, biodiversity, and addressing climate breakdown. In this study, we investigated urban growth, its intersection with hazards, and the availability of greenspace for di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. S. Watson, J. R. Elliott, S. K. Ebmeier, M. A. Vásquez, C. Zapata, S. Bonilla-Bedoya, P. Cubillo, D. F. Orbe, M. Córdova, J. Menoscal, E. Sevilla
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-05-01
Series:Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/1699/2022/nhess-22-1699-2022.pdf
_version_ 1829115585468825600
author C. S. Watson
J. R. Elliott
S. K. Ebmeier
M. A. Vásquez
C. Zapata
S. Bonilla-Bedoya
P. Cubillo
D. F. Orbe
M. Córdova
J. Menoscal
E. Sevilla
author_facet C. S. Watson
J. R. Elliott
S. K. Ebmeier
M. A. Vásquez
C. Zapata
S. Bonilla-Bedoya
P. Cubillo
D. F. Orbe
M. Córdova
J. Menoscal
E. Sevilla
author_sort C. S. Watson
collection DOAJ
description <p>Greenspaces within broader ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) strategies provide multiple benefits to society, biodiversity, and addressing climate breakdown. In this study, we investigated urban growth, its intersection with hazards, and the availability of greenspace for disaster risk reduction (DRR) in the city of Quito, Ecuador, which experiences multiple hazards including landslides, floods, volcanoes, and earthquakes. We used satellite data to quantify urban sprawl and developed a workflow incorporating high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) to identify potential greenspaces for emergency refuge accommodation (DRR greenspace), for example, following an earthquake. Quito's historical urban growth totalled <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 192 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> for 1986–2020 and was primarily on flatter land, in some cases crossed by steep ravines. By contrast, future projections indicate an increasing intersection between easterly urbanisation and steep areas of high landslide susceptibility. Therefore, a timely opportunity exists for future risk-informed planning. Our workflow identified 18.6 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> of DRR greenspaces, of which 16.3 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> intersected with potential sources of landslide and flood hazards, indicating that hazard events could impact potential “safe spaces”. These spaces could mitigate future risk if designated as greenspaces and left undeveloped. DRR greenspace overlapped 7 % (2.5 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span>) with municipality-designated greenspace. Similarly, 10 % (1.7 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span>) of municipality-designated “safe space” for use following an earthquake was classified as potentially DRR suitable in our analysis. For emergency refuge, currently designated greenspaces could accommodate <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 2 %–14 % (depending on space requirements) of Quito's population within 800 m. This increases to 8 %–40 % considering all the potential DRR greenspace mapped in this study. Therefore, a gap exists between the provision of DRR and designated greenspace. Within Quito, we found a disparity between access to greenspaces across socio-economic groups, with lower income groups having less access and further to travel to designated greenspaces. Notably, the accessibility of greenspaces was high overall with 98 % (2.3 million) of Quito's population within 800 m of a designated greenspace, of which 88 % (2.1 million) had access to potential DRR greenspaces. Our workflow demonstrates a citywide evaluation of DRR greenspace potential and provides the foundation upon which to evaluate these spaces with local stakeholders. Promoting equitable access to greenspaces, communicating their multiple benefits, and considering their use to restrict propagating development into hazardous areas are key themes that emerge for further investigation.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-12T16:17:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-72f6ce3864e74762b542d2911c5f5a8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1561-8633
1684-9981
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T16:17:32Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-72f6ce3864e74762b542d2911c5f5a8d2022-12-22T00:19:02ZengCopernicus PublicationsNatural Hazards and Earth System Sciences1561-86331684-99812022-05-01221699172110.5194/nhess-22-1699-2022Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, EcuadorC. S. Watson0J. R. Elliott1S. K. Ebmeier2M. A. Vásquez3C. Zapata4S. Bonilla-Bedoya5P. Cubillo6D. F. Orbe7M. Córdova8J. Menoscal9E. Sevilla10COMET, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKCOMET, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKCOMET, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UKCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito 170901, EcuadorCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito 170901, EcuadorResearch Center for the Territory and Sustainable Habitat, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Machala y Sabanilla, 170301, Quito, EcuadorCentro de Información Urbana de Quito - CIUQ, Quito, EcuadorCentro de Información Urbana de Quito - CIUQ, Quito, EcuadorFacultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO, Quito, EcuadorFacultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO, Quito, EcuadorCollege of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito 170901, Ecuador<p>Greenspaces within broader ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) strategies provide multiple benefits to society, biodiversity, and addressing climate breakdown. In this study, we investigated urban growth, its intersection with hazards, and the availability of greenspace for disaster risk reduction (DRR) in the city of Quito, Ecuador, which experiences multiple hazards including landslides, floods, volcanoes, and earthquakes. We used satellite data to quantify urban sprawl and developed a workflow incorporating high-resolution digital elevation models (DEMs) to identify potential greenspaces for emergency refuge accommodation (DRR greenspace), for example, following an earthquake. Quito's historical urban growth totalled <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 192 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> for 1986–2020 and was primarily on flatter land, in some cases crossed by steep ravines. By contrast, future projections indicate an increasing intersection between easterly urbanisation and steep areas of high landslide susceptibility. Therefore, a timely opportunity exists for future risk-informed planning. Our workflow identified 18.6 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> of DRR greenspaces, of which 16.3 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span> intersected with potential sources of landslide and flood hazards, indicating that hazard events could impact potential “safe spaces”. These spaces could mitigate future risk if designated as greenspaces and left undeveloped. DRR greenspace overlapped 7 % (2.5 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span>) with municipality-designated greenspace. Similarly, 10 % (1.7 km<span class="inline-formula"><sup>2</sup></span>) of municipality-designated “safe space” for use following an earthquake was classified as potentially DRR suitable in our analysis. For emergency refuge, currently designated greenspaces could accommodate <span class="inline-formula">∼</span> 2 %–14 % (depending on space requirements) of Quito's population within 800 m. This increases to 8 %–40 % considering all the potential DRR greenspace mapped in this study. Therefore, a gap exists between the provision of DRR and designated greenspace. Within Quito, we found a disparity between access to greenspaces across socio-economic groups, with lower income groups having less access and further to travel to designated greenspaces. Notably, the accessibility of greenspaces was high overall with 98 % (2.3 million) of Quito's population within 800 m of a designated greenspace, of which 88 % (2.1 million) had access to potential DRR greenspaces. Our workflow demonstrates a citywide evaluation of DRR greenspace potential and provides the foundation upon which to evaluate these spaces with local stakeholders. Promoting equitable access to greenspaces, communicating their multiple benefits, and considering their use to restrict propagating development into hazardous areas are key themes that emerge for further investigation.</p>https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/1699/2022/nhess-22-1699-2022.pdf
spellingShingle C. S. Watson
J. R. Elliott
S. K. Ebmeier
M. A. Vásquez
C. Zapata
S. Bonilla-Bedoya
P. Cubillo
D. F. Orbe
M. Córdova
J. Menoscal
E. Sevilla
Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, Ecuador
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
title Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, Ecuador
title_full Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, Ecuador
title_fullStr Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, Ecuador
title_short Enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising Quito, Ecuador
title_sort enhancing disaster risk resilience using greenspace in urbanising quito ecuador
url https://nhess.copernicus.org/articles/22/1699/2022/nhess-22-1699-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cswatson enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT jrelliott enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT skebmeier enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT mavasquez enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT czapata enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT sbonillabedoya enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT pcubillo enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT dforbe enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT mcordova enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT jmenoscal enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador
AT esevilla enhancingdisasterriskresilienceusinggreenspaceinurbanisingquitoecuador