Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Current Research in Insect Science |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515823000069 |
_version_ | 1797798606460157952 |
---|---|
author | Brent J. Sinclair |
author_facet | Brent J. Sinclair |
author_sort | Brent J. Sinclair |
collection | DOAJ |
first_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:06:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-72f772d3ec5c4bd9a7fd972b4a44f292 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2666-5158 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-13T04:06:21Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Current Research in Insect Science |
spelling | doaj.art-72f772d3ec5c4bd9a7fd972b4a44f2922023-06-21T07:00:36ZengElsevierCurrent Research in Insect Science2666-51582023-01-013100057Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishingBrent J. Sinclair0Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canadahttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515823000069 |
spellingShingle | Brent J. Sinclair Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing Current Research in Insect Science |
title | Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing |
title_full | Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing |
title_fullStr | Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing |
title_full_unstemmed | Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing |
title_short | Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing |
title_sort | letting chatgpt do your science is fraudulent and a bad idea but ai generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515823000069 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brentjsinclair lettingchatgptdoyourscienceisfraudulentandabadideabutaigeneratedtextcanenhanceinclusivenessinpublishing |