Letting ChatGPT do your science is fraudulent (and a bad idea), but AI-generated text can enhance inclusiveness in publishing
Main Author: | Brent J. Sinclair |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Current Research in Insect Science |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666515823000069 |
Similar Items
-
ChatGPT and the AI Act
by: Natali Helberger, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
ChatGPT, authorship, and medical publishing
by: Amnuay Kleebayoon, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing
by: Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life
by: Zhicheng Lin
Published: (2023-08-01) -
The role of ChatGPT in scholarly editing and publishing
by: Panagiotis Tsigaris, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)