The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659/full |
_version_ | 1818730332995715072 |
---|---|
author | Aleksander Matusiński Przemysław Pietraszewski Michał Krzysztofik Artur Gołaś |
author_facet | Aleksander Matusiński Przemysław Pietraszewski Michał Krzysztofik Artur Gołaś |
author_sort | Aleksander Matusiński |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T23:00:07Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-7312ab2a514c46f99d0193e5da914d1b |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-042X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T23:00:07Z |
publishDate | 2021-03-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Physiology |
spelling | doaj.art-7312ab2a514c46f99d0193e5da914d1b2022-12-21T21:29:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2021-03-011210.3389/fphys.2021.651659651659The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female SprintersAleksander Matusiński0Przemysław Pietraszewski1Michał Krzysztofik2Artur Gołaś3Department of Exercise and Sport Performance, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandConsidering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659/fullsprintingpost-activation performance enhancementpost-activation potentiation (PAP)sprint trainingtraining and developmentresisted sprint training |
spellingShingle | Aleksander Matusiński Przemysław Pietraszewski Michał Krzysztofik Artur Gołaś The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters Frontiers in Physiology sprinting post-activation performance enhancement post-activation potentiation (PAP) sprint training training and development resisted sprint training |
title | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_full | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_short | The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters |
title_sort | effects of resisted post activation sprint performance enhancement in elite female sprinters |
topic | sprinting post-activation performance enhancement post-activation potentiation (PAP) sprint training training and development resisted sprint training |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aleksandermatusinski theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT przemysławpietraszewski theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT michałkrzysztofik theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT arturgołas theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT aleksandermatusinski effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT przemysławpietraszewski effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT michałkrzysztofik effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters AT arturgołas effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters |