The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters

Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aleksander Matusiński, Przemysław Pietraszewski, Michał Krzysztofik, Artur Gołaś
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Physiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659/full
_version_ 1818730332995715072
author Aleksander Matusiński
Przemysław Pietraszewski
Michał Krzysztofik
Artur Gołaś
author_facet Aleksander Matusiński
Przemysław Pietraszewski
Michał Krzysztofik
Artur Gołaś
author_sort Aleksander Matusiński
collection DOAJ
description Considering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:00:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7312ab2a514c46f99d0193e5da914d1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-042X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:00:07Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Physiology
spelling doaj.art-7312ab2a514c46f99d0193e5da914d1b2022-12-21T21:29:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physiology1664-042X2021-03-011210.3389/fphys.2021.651659651659The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female SprintersAleksander Matusiński0Przemysław Pietraszewski1Michał Krzysztofik2Artur Gołaś3Department of Exercise and Sport Performance, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Katowice, PolandConsidering the effectiveness of resisted sprint training, and the acute enhancement of sprinting performance through locomotor post-activation performance enhancement, the main objective of the research was to determine the acute effects of resisted activation with loads of 5, 10, and 15% body mass on sprint and flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters using resisted drag technology system. Ten elite female sprinters (age: 23.2 ± 5.4 years, body mass: 54.2 ± 6.1 kg, height: 167.4 ± 7.3 cm, personal best for 100 m: 12.05 ± 0.56 s, and for 400 m: 53.17 ± 2.76 s) performed two unresisted 20-m sprints (from a crouched and flying start) before and after a single resisted sprint loaded with 5, 10, or 15% body mass to verify the effectiveness of the activation stimulus. Compared with pre-activation, Friedman tests showed that peak velocity increased by 1.6 ± 2.2% [effect size (ES) = 0.66], 2.3 ± 1.5% (ES = 1.33), and 0.2 ± 1% (ES = 0.09), as well as peak force by 2.8 ± 2.1% (ES = 0.49), 3.5 ± 2.3% (ES = 1), and 0.5 ± 2.4% (ES = 0.14), concomitant with a significant decreased in sprint time by −0.5 ± 1.2% (ES = −0.07), −2.5 ± 1.3% (ES = −0.64), and −1 ± 1.4% (ES = −0.36) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass post-activation, respectively (p < 0.001; for all). Furthermore, the ANOVA showed that peak power increased by 2.9 ± 2.3% (ES = 0.61), 3.8 ± 2.2% (ES = 1.05), and 2 ± 7.1% (ES = 0.22) for the 5, 10, and 15% body mass resisted-conditioning activity, respectively, with no difference between the three conditions (p = 0.003 main effect time, no interaction). Moreover, compared with the 5 and 15% body mass trials [−1.5 ± 2% (ES = −0.44), −0.8 ± 0.8% (ES = −0.44), respectively], the ANOVA showed that flying start sprint time significantly decreased by −4.3 ± 1.1% (ES = −1.25) (p < 0.001, interaction effect) after a 10% body mass resisted-conditioning activity. The results of this study indicated that resisted sprints acutely enhance sprint performance; however, their effectiveness depends on the applied load. A single resisted sprint using 10% body mass is effective at inducing a potentiating effect on subsequent 20-m flying start sprint performance in elite female sprinters. Therefore, keeping in mind the optimal load, it is recommended to perform resisted sprints as a conditioning activation when seeking to acutely enhance 20-m flying start sprint performance in these athletes.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659/fullsprintingpost-activation performance enhancementpost-activation potentiation (PAP)sprint trainingtraining and developmentresisted sprint training
spellingShingle Aleksander Matusiński
Przemysław Pietraszewski
Michał Krzysztofik
Artur Gołaś
The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
Frontiers in Physiology
sprinting
post-activation performance enhancement
post-activation potentiation (PAP)
sprint training
training and development
resisted sprint training
title The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_full The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_fullStr The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_full_unstemmed The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_short The Effects of Resisted Post-Activation Sprint Performance Enhancement in Elite Female Sprinters
title_sort effects of resisted post activation sprint performance enhancement in elite female sprinters
topic sprinting
post-activation performance enhancement
post-activation potentiation (PAP)
sprint training
training and development
resisted sprint training
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2021.651659/full
work_keys_str_mv AT aleksandermatusinski theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT przemysławpietraszewski theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT michałkrzysztofik theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT arturgołas theeffectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT aleksandermatusinski effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT przemysławpietraszewski effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT michałkrzysztofik effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters
AT arturgołas effectsofresistedpostactivationsprintperformanceenhancementinelitefemalesprinters