Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysis

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral psychiatric disorder that afflicts children, with a reported prevalence of 2.4% to 19.8% worldwide. Stimulants (methylphenidate [MPH] and amphetamine) are co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jain Rakesh, Babcock Thomas, Burtea Teodor, Dirks Bryan, Adeyi Ben, Scheckner Brian, Lasser Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-11-01
Series:Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/35
_version_ 1811319786160783360
author Jain Rakesh
Babcock Thomas
Burtea Teodor
Dirks Bryan
Adeyi Ben
Scheckner Brian
Lasser Robert
author_facet Jain Rakesh
Babcock Thomas
Burtea Teodor
Dirks Bryan
Adeyi Ben
Scheckner Brian
Lasser Robert
author_sort Jain Rakesh
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral psychiatric disorder that afflicts children, with a reported prevalence of 2.4% to 19.8% worldwide. Stimulants (methylphenidate [MPH] and amphetamine) are considered first-line ADHD pharmacotherapy. MPH is a catecholamine reuptake inhibitor, whereas amphetamines have additional presynaptic activity. Although MPH and amphetamine can effectively manage ADHD symptoms in most pediatric patients, many still fail to respond optimally to either. After administration, the prodrug stimulant lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is converted to l-lysine and therapeutically active d-amphetamine in the blood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of LDX in children with ADHD who remained symptomatic (ie, nonremitters; ADHD Rating Scale IV [ADHD-RS-IV] total score > 18) on MPH therapy prior to enrollment in a 4-week placebo-controlled LDX trial, compared with the overall population.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this post hoc analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, forced-dose titration study, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of LDX in children aged 6-12 years with and without prior MPH treatment at screening. ADHD symptoms were assessed using the ADHD-RS-IV scale, Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised short form (CPRS-R), and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, at screening, baseline, and endpoint. ADHD-RS-IV total and CPRS-R ADHD Index scores were summarized as mean (SD). Clinical response for the subgroup analysis was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction from baseline in ADHD-RS-IV score and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2. Dunnett test was used to compare change from baseline in all groups. Number needed to treat to achieve one clinical responder or one symptomatic remitter was calculated as the reciprocal of the difference in their proportions on active treatment and placebo at endpoint.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of 290 randomized participants enrolled, 28 received MPH therapy at screening, of which 26 remained symptomatic (ADHD-RS-IV > 18). ADHD-RS-IV total scores, changes from baseline, clinical responsiveness, and rates of symptomatic remission in this subgroup were comparable to the overall population. The safety and tolerability profiles for LDX were comparable to other stimulants currently available.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this analysis, children with significant clinical ADHD symptoms despite MPH treatment improved during treatment with LDX and experienced similar improvements in their symptoms as the overall study population.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00556296">NCT00556296</a></p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:48:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-731c5c8ae0b04bdbaf2e89d840074839
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1753-2000
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:48:35Z
publishDate 2011-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
spelling doaj.art-731c5c8ae0b04bdbaf2e89d8400748392022-12-22T02:46:18ZengBMCChild and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health1753-20002011-11-01513510.1186/1753-2000-5-35Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysisJain RakeshBabcock ThomasBurtea TeodorDirks BryanAdeyi BenScheckner BrianLasser Robert<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurobehavioral psychiatric disorder that afflicts children, with a reported prevalence of 2.4% to 19.8% worldwide. Stimulants (methylphenidate [MPH] and amphetamine) are considered first-line ADHD pharmacotherapy. MPH is a catecholamine reuptake inhibitor, whereas amphetamines have additional presynaptic activity. Although MPH and amphetamine can effectively manage ADHD symptoms in most pediatric patients, many still fail to respond optimally to either. After administration, the prodrug stimulant lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is converted to l-lysine and therapeutically active d-amphetamine in the blood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of LDX in children with ADHD who remained symptomatic (ie, nonremitters; ADHD Rating Scale IV [ADHD-RS-IV] total score > 18) on MPH therapy prior to enrollment in a 4-week placebo-controlled LDX trial, compared with the overall population.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In this post hoc analysis of data from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, forced-dose titration study, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of LDX in children aged 6-12 years with and without prior MPH treatment at screening. ADHD symptoms were assessed using the ADHD-RS-IV scale, Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised short form (CPRS-R), and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, at screening, baseline, and endpoint. ADHD-RS-IV total and CPRS-R ADHD Index scores were summarized as mean (SD). Clinical response for the subgroup analysis was defined as a ≥ 30% reduction from baseline in ADHD-RS-IV score and a CGI-I score of 1 or 2. Dunnett test was used to compare change from baseline in all groups. Number needed to treat to achieve one clinical responder or one symptomatic remitter was calculated as the reciprocal of the difference in their proportions on active treatment and placebo at endpoint.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of 290 randomized participants enrolled, 28 received MPH therapy at screening, of which 26 remained symptomatic (ADHD-RS-IV > 18). ADHD-RS-IV total scores, changes from baseline, clinical responsiveness, and rates of symptomatic remission in this subgroup were comparable to the overall population. The safety and tolerability profiles for LDX were comparable to other stimulants currently available.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>In this analysis, children with significant clinical ADHD symptoms despite MPH treatment improved during treatment with LDX and experienced similar improvements in their symptoms as the overall study population.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00556296">NCT00556296</a></p>http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/35Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX)methylphenidatechildrenefficacy
spellingShingle Jain Rakesh
Babcock Thomas
Burtea Teodor
Dirks Bryan
Adeyi Ben
Scheckner Brian
Lasser Robert
Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysis
Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX)
methylphenidate
children
efficacy
title Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysis
title_full Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysis
title_short Efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate: a post hoc analysis
title_sort efficacy of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder previously treated with methylphenidate a post hoc analysis
topic Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX)
methylphenidate
children
efficacy
url http://www.capmh.com/content/5/1/35
work_keys_str_mv AT jainrakesh efficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinchildrenwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpreviouslytreatedwithmethylphenidateaposthocanalysis
AT babcockthomas efficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinchildrenwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpreviouslytreatedwithmethylphenidateaposthocanalysis
AT burteateodor efficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinchildrenwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpreviouslytreatedwithmethylphenidateaposthocanalysis
AT dirksbryan efficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinchildrenwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpreviouslytreatedwithmethylphenidateaposthocanalysis
AT adeyiben efficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinchildrenwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpreviouslytreatedwithmethylphenidateaposthocanalysis
AT schecknerbrian efficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinchildrenwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpreviouslytreatedwithmethylphenidateaposthocanalysis
AT lasserrobert efficacyoflisdexamfetaminedimesylateinchildrenwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderpreviouslytreatedwithmethylphenidateaposthocanalysis