Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions

Negative social evaluations represent social threats and elicit negative emotions such as anger or fear. Positive social evaluations, by contrast, may increase self-esteem and generate positive emotions such as happiness and pride. Gender differences are likely to shape both the perception and expre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole eWiggert, Frank H. Wilhelm, Birgit eDerntl, Jens eBlechert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01372/full
_version_ 1818253653297856512
author Nicole eWiggert
Frank H. Wilhelm
Birgit eDerntl
Birgit eDerntl
Birgit eDerntl
Jens eBlechert
author_facet Nicole eWiggert
Frank H. Wilhelm
Birgit eDerntl
Birgit eDerntl
Birgit eDerntl
Jens eBlechert
author_sort Nicole eWiggert
collection DOAJ
description Negative social evaluations represent social threats and elicit negative emotions such as anger or fear. Positive social evaluations, by contrast, may increase self-esteem and generate positive emotions such as happiness and pride. Gender differences are likely to shape both the perception and expression of positive and negative social evaluations. Yet, current knowledge is limited by a reliance on studies that used static images of individual expressers with limited external validity. Furthermore, only few studies considered gender differences on both the expresser and perceiver side. The present study approached these limitations by utilizing a naturalistic stimulus set displaying 9 males and 9 females (expressers) delivering social evaluative sentences to 32 female and 26 male participants (perceivers). Perceivers watched 30 positive, 30 negative, and 30 neutral messages while facial electromyography (EMG) was continuously recorded and subjective ratings were obtained. Results indicated that men expressing positive evaluations elicited stronger EMG responses in both perceiver genders. Arousal was rated higher when positive evaluations were expressed by the opposite gender. Thus, gender differences need to be more explicitly considered in research of social cognition and affective science using naturalistic social stimuli.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T16:43:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-732974f34aa24e399349aa9701f83417
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T16:43:29Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-732974f34aa24e399349aa9701f834172022-12-22T00:18:31ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-09-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.01372149006Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactionsNicole eWiggert0Frank H. Wilhelm1Birgit eDerntl2Birgit eDerntl3Birgit eDerntl4Jens eBlechert5University of SalzburgUniversity of SalzburgUniversity of AachenTranslational Brain MedicineResearch Center JülichUniversity of SalzburgNegative social evaluations represent social threats and elicit negative emotions such as anger or fear. Positive social evaluations, by contrast, may increase self-esteem and generate positive emotions such as happiness and pride. Gender differences are likely to shape both the perception and expression of positive and negative social evaluations. Yet, current knowledge is limited by a reliance on studies that used static images of individual expressers with limited external validity. Furthermore, only few studies considered gender differences on both the expresser and perceiver side. The present study approached these limitations by utilizing a naturalistic stimulus set displaying 9 males and 9 females (expressers) delivering social evaluative sentences to 32 female and 26 male participants (perceivers). Perceivers watched 30 positive, 30 negative, and 30 neutral messages while facial electromyography (EMG) was continuously recorded and subjective ratings were obtained. Results indicated that men expressing positive evaluations elicited stronger EMG responses in both perceiver genders. Arousal was rated higher when positive evaluations were expressed by the opposite gender. Thus, gender differences need to be more explicitly considered in research of social cognition and affective science using naturalistic social stimuli.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01372/fullemotionsocial interactionsex differencesfacial electromyographysocial evaluation
spellingShingle Nicole eWiggert
Frank H. Wilhelm
Birgit eDerntl
Birgit eDerntl
Birgit eDerntl
Jens eBlechert
Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions
Frontiers in Psychology
emotion
social interaction
sex differences
facial electromyography
social evaluation
title Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions
title_full Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions
title_fullStr Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions
title_full_unstemmed Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions
title_short Gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions
title_sort gender differences in experiential and facial reactivity to approval and disapproval during emotional social interactions
topic emotion
social interaction
sex differences
facial electromyography
social evaluation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01372/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoleewiggert genderdifferencesinexperientialandfacialreactivitytoapprovalanddisapprovalduringemotionalsocialinteractions
AT frankhwilhelm genderdifferencesinexperientialandfacialreactivitytoapprovalanddisapprovalduringemotionalsocialinteractions
AT birgitederntl genderdifferencesinexperientialandfacialreactivitytoapprovalanddisapprovalduringemotionalsocialinteractions
AT birgitederntl genderdifferencesinexperientialandfacialreactivitytoapprovalanddisapprovalduringemotionalsocialinteractions
AT birgitederntl genderdifferencesinexperientialandfacialreactivitytoapprovalanddisapprovalduringemotionalsocialinteractions
AT jenseblechert genderdifferencesinexperientialandfacialreactivitytoapprovalanddisapprovalduringemotionalsocialinteractions