Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants

Background: In 2015, the neonatal resuscitation guidelines incorporated the use of electrocardiography (ECG) to monitor heart rate of newborns. However, previous studies have indicated that cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity rhythm (PEA) may occur in the delivery room, rendering this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deandra H. Luong, Po-Yin Cheung, Megan O'Reilly, Tze-Fun Lee, Georg M. Schmolzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00366/full
_version_ 1818418416411738112
author Deandra H. Luong
Deandra H. Luong
Po-Yin Cheung
Po-Yin Cheung
Megan O'Reilly
Tze-Fun Lee
Georg M. Schmolzer
Georg M. Schmolzer
author_facet Deandra H. Luong
Deandra H. Luong
Po-Yin Cheung
Po-Yin Cheung
Megan O'Reilly
Tze-Fun Lee
Georg M. Schmolzer
Georg M. Schmolzer
author_sort Deandra H. Luong
collection DOAJ
description Background: In 2015, the neonatal resuscitation guidelines incorporated the use of electrocardiography (ECG) to monitor heart rate of newborns. However, previous studies have indicated that cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity rhythm (PEA) may occur in the delivery room, rendering this method problematic.Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of ECG and auscultation to assess heart rate during PEA.Methods: A total of 45 piglets (age 1–3 days, weight 1.7–2.3 kg) were exposed to 30 min normocapnic alveolar hypoxia followed by asphyxia until asystole, achieved by disconnecting the ventilator and clamping the endotracheal tube. During asphyxia, heart rate (HR) was assess using auscultation, ECG, and carotid blood flow (CBF). At the time of asystole (defined as zero CBF) HR auscultated using a neonatal/infant stethoscope was compared to ECG traces.Results: The median (IQR) duration of asphyxia was 325 (200–491) s. In 8 (18%) piglets, CBF, ECG, and auscultation identified asystole. In 22 (49%) piglets no CBF and no audible heart sounds, were observed, while ECG displayed a HR ranging from 17 to 75/min. Fifteen (33%) piglets remained bradycardic (defined as HR of < 100/min) after 10 min of asphyxia, which was identified by CBF, ECG, and auscultation. The overall accuracy of ECG and auscultation in the detection of HR were 51 and 80%, respectively (p = 0.004).Conclusion: In cases with PEA ECG is not superior in correctly identifying HR in newborn piglets.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T12:22:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7332cf2cfce042a2884b8b643b926a0b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T12:22:20Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-7332cf2cfce042a2884b8b643b926a0b2022-12-21T23:01:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602018-11-01610.3389/fped.2018.00366425927Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn InfantsDeandra H. Luong0Deandra H. Luong1Po-Yin Cheung2Po-Yin Cheung3Megan O'Reilly4Tze-Fun Lee5Georg M. Schmolzer6Georg M. Schmolzer7Faculty of Science, University of AlbertaEdmonton, AB, CanadaCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra HospitalEdmonton, AB, CanadaCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra HospitalEdmonton, AB, CanadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaEdmonton, AB, CanadaCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra HospitalEdmonton, AB, CanadaCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra HospitalEdmonton, AB, CanadaCentre for the Studies of Asphyxia and Resuscitation, Royal Alexandra HospitalEdmonton, AB, CanadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of AlbertaEdmonton, AB, CanadaBackground: In 2015, the neonatal resuscitation guidelines incorporated the use of electrocardiography (ECG) to monitor heart rate of newborns. However, previous studies have indicated that cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity rhythm (PEA) may occur in the delivery room, rendering this method problematic.Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of ECG and auscultation to assess heart rate during PEA.Methods: A total of 45 piglets (age 1–3 days, weight 1.7–2.3 kg) were exposed to 30 min normocapnic alveolar hypoxia followed by asphyxia until asystole, achieved by disconnecting the ventilator and clamping the endotracheal tube. During asphyxia, heart rate (HR) was assess using auscultation, ECG, and carotid blood flow (CBF). At the time of asystole (defined as zero CBF) HR auscultated using a neonatal/infant stethoscope was compared to ECG traces.Results: The median (IQR) duration of asphyxia was 325 (200–491) s. In 8 (18%) piglets, CBF, ECG, and auscultation identified asystole. In 22 (49%) piglets no CBF and no audible heart sounds, were observed, while ECG displayed a HR ranging from 17 to 75/min. Fifteen (33%) piglets remained bradycardic (defined as HR of < 100/min) after 10 min of asphyxia, which was identified by CBF, ECG, and auscultation. The overall accuracy of ECG and auscultation in the detection of HR were 51 and 80%, respectively (p = 0.004).Conclusion: In cases with PEA ECG is not superior in correctly identifying HR in newborn piglets.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00366/fullinfantsnewbornneonatal resuscitationasphyxiaheart rateelectrocardiography
spellingShingle Deandra H. Luong
Deandra H. Luong
Po-Yin Cheung
Po-Yin Cheung
Megan O'Reilly
Tze-Fun Lee
Georg M. Schmolzer
Georg M. Schmolzer
Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants
Frontiers in Pediatrics
infants
newborn
neonatal resuscitation
asphyxia
heart rate
electrocardiography
title Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants
title_full Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants
title_fullStr Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants
title_full_unstemmed Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants
title_short Electrocardiography vs. Auscultation to Assess Heart Rate During Cardiac Arrest With Pulseless Electrical Activity in Newborn Infants
title_sort electrocardiography vs auscultation to assess heart rate during cardiac arrest with pulseless electrical activity in newborn infants
topic infants
newborn
neonatal resuscitation
asphyxia
heart rate
electrocardiography
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fped.2018.00366/full
work_keys_str_mv AT deandrahluong electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants
AT deandrahluong electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants
AT poyincheung electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants
AT poyincheung electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants
AT meganoreilly electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants
AT tzefunlee electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants
AT georgmschmolzer electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants
AT georgmschmolzer electrocardiographyvsauscultationtoassessheartrateduringcardiacarrestwithpulselesselectricalactivityinnewborninfants