Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?

Abstract Retrieval practice, such as filling in blanks or taking quizzes, is firmly established as an effective study strategy. However, the underlying mechanism of how retrieval practice benefits memory is still unclear. One current theory, the episodic context account, proposes that retrieval enha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Min Kyung Hong, Sean M. Polyn, Lisa K. Fazio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-12-01
Series:Cognitive Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0202-3
_version_ 1819077016105779200
author Min Kyung Hong
Sean M. Polyn
Lisa K. Fazio
author_facet Min Kyung Hong
Sean M. Polyn
Lisa K. Fazio
author_sort Min Kyung Hong
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Retrieval practice, such as filling in blanks or taking quizzes, is firmly established as an effective study strategy. However, the underlying mechanism of how retrieval practice benefits memory is still unclear. One current theory, the episodic context account, proposes that retrieval enhances memory by reinstating a prior learning context. This retrieved context is then strengthened and updated to include context at the time of recall, which later serves as an effective retrieval cue. However, few studies have directly tested this hypothesis. We did so by examining participants’ memory for the initial study context. Across three experiments, participants encoded cue-target pairs presented in different colors and either restudied or practiced retrieving the targets. If retrieval practice benefits memory by reinstating the prior episodic context, participants who successfully retrieved the items during practice should have enhanced memory for context details (i.e. font color) compared to participants who restudied the pairs. Contrary to this prediction, memory for font colors did not differ between the restudy condition and the retrieval practice condition. Even when font color was actively attended to and integrated with the to-be-remembered items, retrieval practice did not increase memory for this aspect of context. Our results suggest that the context reinstated during retrieval practice is limited in nature. Aspects of the context that are not essential to retrieval of the item are not strengthened by retrieval practice.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T18:50:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7349d0879bbc401e892b217ff31f1123
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2365-7464
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T18:50:29Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Cognitive Research
spelling doaj.art-7349d0879bbc401e892b217ff31f11232022-12-21T18:53:46ZengSpringerOpenCognitive Research2365-74642019-12-01411910.1186/s41235-019-0202-3Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?Min Kyung Hong0Sean M. Polyn1Lisa K. Fazio2Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt UniversityDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt UniversityDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt UniversityAbstract Retrieval practice, such as filling in blanks or taking quizzes, is firmly established as an effective study strategy. However, the underlying mechanism of how retrieval practice benefits memory is still unclear. One current theory, the episodic context account, proposes that retrieval enhances memory by reinstating a prior learning context. This retrieved context is then strengthened and updated to include context at the time of recall, which later serves as an effective retrieval cue. However, few studies have directly tested this hypothesis. We did so by examining participants’ memory for the initial study context. Across three experiments, participants encoded cue-target pairs presented in different colors and either restudied or practiced retrieving the targets. If retrieval practice benefits memory by reinstating the prior episodic context, participants who successfully retrieved the items during practice should have enhanced memory for context details (i.e. font color) compared to participants who restudied the pairs. Contrary to this prediction, memory for font colors did not differ between the restudy condition and the retrieval practice condition. Even when font color was actively attended to and integrated with the to-be-remembered items, retrieval practice did not increase memory for this aspect of context. Our results suggest that the context reinstated during retrieval practice is limited in nature. Aspects of the context that are not essential to retrieval of the item are not strengthened by retrieval practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0202-3Retrieval practiceTesting effectContextMemory
spellingShingle Min Kyung Hong
Sean M. Polyn
Lisa K. Fazio
Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
Cognitive Research
Retrieval practice
Testing effect
Context
Memory
title Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
title_full Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
title_fullStr Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
title_full_unstemmed Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
title_short Examining the episodic context account: does retrieval practice enhance memory for context?
title_sort examining the episodic context account does retrieval practice enhance memory for context
topic Retrieval practice
Testing effect
Context
Memory
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0202-3
work_keys_str_mv AT minkyunghong examiningtheepisodiccontextaccountdoesretrievalpracticeenhancememoryforcontext
AT seanmpolyn examiningtheepisodiccontextaccountdoesretrievalpracticeenhancememoryforcontext
AT lisakfazio examiningtheepisodiccontextaccountdoesretrievalpracticeenhancememoryforcontext