A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides

Background In semi-arid regions, the use of plastic mulch and pesticides in conventional agriculture is nearly ubiquitous. Although the sorption of pesticides on Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) has been previously studied, no data are available for other plastics such as Pro-oxidant Additive Contain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolas Beriot, Paul Zomer, Raul Zornoza, Violette Geissen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2020-09-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/9876.pdf
_version_ 1797420267248549888
author Nicolas Beriot
Paul Zomer
Raul Zornoza
Violette Geissen
author_facet Nicolas Beriot
Paul Zomer
Raul Zornoza
Violette Geissen
author_sort Nicolas Beriot
collection DOAJ
description Background In semi-arid regions, the use of plastic mulch and pesticides in conventional agriculture is nearly ubiquitous. Although the sorption of pesticides on Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) has been previously studied, no data are available for other plastics such as Pro-oxidant Additive Containing (PAC) plastics or “biodegradable” (Bio) plastics. The aim of this research was to measure the sorption pattern of active substances from pesticides on LDPE, PAC and Bio plastic mulches and to compare the decay of the active substances in the presence and absence of plastic debris. Methods For this purpose, 38 active substances from 17 insecticides, 15 fungicides and six herbicides commonly applied with plastic mulching in South-east Spain were incubated with a 3 × 3 cm2 piece of plastic mulch (LDPE, PAC and Bio). The incubation was done in a solution of 10% acetonitrile and 90% distilled water at 35 °C for 15 days in the dark. The Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe approach was adapted to extract the pesticides. Results The sorption behavior depended on both the pesticide and the plastic mulch type. On average, the sorption percentage was ~23% on LDPE and PAC and ~50% on Bio. The decay of active substances in the presence of plastic was ~30% lesser than the decay of active substances in solution alone. This study is the first attempt at assessing the behavior of a diversity of plastic mulches and pesticides to further define research needs.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T07:00:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73587af924b14d509fb81f6355355dcc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2167-8359
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T07:00:07Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format Article
series PeerJ
spelling doaj.art-73587af924b14d509fb81f6355355dcc2023-12-03T09:54:57ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592020-09-018e987610.7717/peerj.9876A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticidesNicolas Beriot0Paul Zomer1Raul Zornoza2Violette Geissen3Soil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, NetherlandsWageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, NetherlandsSustainable Use, Management and Reclamation of Soil and Water Research Group, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Murcia, SpainSoil Physics and Land Management Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, NetherlandsBackground In semi-arid regions, the use of plastic mulch and pesticides in conventional agriculture is nearly ubiquitous. Although the sorption of pesticides on Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) has been previously studied, no data are available for other plastics such as Pro-oxidant Additive Containing (PAC) plastics or “biodegradable” (Bio) plastics. The aim of this research was to measure the sorption pattern of active substances from pesticides on LDPE, PAC and Bio plastic mulches and to compare the decay of the active substances in the presence and absence of plastic debris. Methods For this purpose, 38 active substances from 17 insecticides, 15 fungicides and six herbicides commonly applied with plastic mulching in South-east Spain were incubated with a 3 × 3 cm2 piece of plastic mulch (LDPE, PAC and Bio). The incubation was done in a solution of 10% acetonitrile and 90% distilled water at 35 °C for 15 days in the dark. The Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged Safe approach was adapted to extract the pesticides. Results The sorption behavior depended on both the pesticide and the plastic mulch type. On average, the sorption percentage was ~23% on LDPE and PAC and ~50% on Bio. The decay of active substances in the presence of plastic was ~30% lesser than the decay of active substances in solution alone. This study is the first attempt at assessing the behavior of a diversity of plastic mulches and pesticides to further define research needs.https://peerj.com/articles/9876.pdfPesticides behaviorPlastic mulchPlastic debris
spellingShingle Nicolas Beriot
Paul Zomer
Raul Zornoza
Violette Geissen
A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
PeerJ
Pesticides behavior
Plastic mulch
Plastic debris
title A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_full A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_fullStr A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_full_unstemmed A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_short A laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
title_sort laboratory comparison of the interactions between three plastic mulch types and 38 active substances found in pesticides
topic Pesticides behavior
Plastic mulch
Plastic debris
url https://peerj.com/articles/9876.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasberiot alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT paulzomer alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT raulzornoza alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT violettegeissen alaboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT nicolasberiot laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT paulzomer laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT raulzornoza laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides
AT violettegeissen laboratorycomparisonoftheinteractionsbetweenthreeplasticmulchtypesand38activesubstancesfoundinpesticides