Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas

A 28S rDNA PCR detection assay was previously developed to identify Dipylidium caninum DNA inside single fleas collected from both cats and dogs. Sequence analysis of the 28S rDNA fragment indicated two genetically distinct variations of the target region. The two genotypes, so-called “D. caninum ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Labuschagne Michel, Beugnet Frédéric, Rehbein Steffen, Guillot Jacques, Fourie Josephus, Crafford Dionne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:Parasite
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2018028
_version_ 1797427348294860800
author Labuschagne Michel
Beugnet Frédéric
Rehbein Steffen
Guillot Jacques
Fourie Josephus
Crafford Dionne
author_facet Labuschagne Michel
Beugnet Frédéric
Rehbein Steffen
Guillot Jacques
Fourie Josephus
Crafford Dionne
author_sort Labuschagne Michel
collection DOAJ
description A 28S rDNA PCR detection assay was previously developed to identify Dipylidium caninum DNA inside single fleas collected from both cats and dogs. Sequence analysis of the 28S rDNA fragment indicated two genetically distinct variations of the target region. The two genotypes, so-called “D. caninum canine genotype” and “D. caninum feline genotype”, based on host origin, are further investigated and described in this paper. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and hydrolysis probe-based genotyping assays were developed and validated for genotyping D. caninum DNA. The complete mitochondrial (mt) genome of the “feline genotype” was sequenced and compared to the D. caninum mt genome available in GenBank. The molecular characterization of D. caninum isolates collected from infected fleas, and also proglottids collected from dogs and cats, confirmed the existence of two distinct genotypes. These genotypes are related to host origin (dogs or cats), irrespective of their geographical origin, and they present a biological adaptation to their respective host, as confirmed by the comparison of biological development and host preference in another study. The genetic differences (Part 1, present paper) and biological observations (Part 2, in this journal) enabled us to suggest the existence of two distinct species within D. caninum, which will have to be clarified.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T08:43:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-735a92d249824f9bb01b522ce47dbd19
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1776-1042
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T08:43:57Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series Parasite
spelling doaj.art-735a92d249824f9bb01b522ce47dbd192023-12-02T15:56:54ZengEDP SciencesParasite1776-10422018-01-01253010.1051/parasite/2018028parasite180011Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleasLabuschagne MichelBeugnet FrédéricRehbein SteffenGuillot JacquesFourie JosephusCrafford DionneA 28S rDNA PCR detection assay was previously developed to identify Dipylidium caninum DNA inside single fleas collected from both cats and dogs. Sequence analysis of the 28S rDNA fragment indicated two genetically distinct variations of the target region. The two genotypes, so-called “D. caninum canine genotype” and “D. caninum feline genotype”, based on host origin, are further investigated and described in this paper. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and hydrolysis probe-based genotyping assays were developed and validated for genotyping D. caninum DNA. The complete mitochondrial (mt) genome of the “feline genotype” was sequenced and compared to the D. caninum mt genome available in GenBank. The molecular characterization of D. caninum isolates collected from infected fleas, and also proglottids collected from dogs and cats, confirmed the existence of two distinct genotypes. These genotypes are related to host origin (dogs or cats), irrespective of their geographical origin, and they present a biological adaptation to their respective host, as confirmed by the comparison of biological development and host preference in another study. The genetic differences (Part 1, present paper) and biological observations (Part 2, in this journal) enabled us to suggest the existence of two distinct species within D. caninum, which will have to be clarified.https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2018028Dipylidium caninummitochondrial genomeCtenocephalides felisdogscatsgenotypes
spellingShingle Labuschagne Michel
Beugnet Frédéric
Rehbein Steffen
Guillot Jacques
Fourie Josephus
Crafford Dionne
Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas
Parasite
Dipylidium caninum
mitochondrial genome
Ctenocephalides felis
dogs
cats
genotypes
title Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas
title_full Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas
title_fullStr Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas
title_short Analysis of Dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats, or their respective fleas
title_sort analysis of dipylidium caninum tapeworms from dogs and cats or their respective fleas
topic Dipylidium caninum
mitochondrial genome
Ctenocephalides felis
dogs
cats
genotypes
url https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2018028
work_keys_str_mv AT labuschagnemichel analysisofdipylidiumcaninumtapewormsfromdogsandcatsortheirrespectivefleas
AT beugnetfrederic analysisofdipylidiumcaninumtapewormsfromdogsandcatsortheirrespectivefleas
AT rehbeinsteffen analysisofdipylidiumcaninumtapewormsfromdogsandcatsortheirrespectivefleas
AT guillotjacques analysisofdipylidiumcaninumtapewormsfromdogsandcatsortheirrespectivefleas
AT fouriejosephus analysisofdipylidiumcaninumtapewormsfromdogsandcatsortheirrespectivefleas
AT crafforddionne analysisofdipylidiumcaninumtapewormsfromdogsandcatsortheirrespectivefleas