First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical Thermosyphon

The main categories of solar water heating systems (SWHSs) are the thermosyphon and the forced circulation (FC). This paper presents an experiment carried out with the aim to compare the energy performance of the FC with a thermosyphon SHWS. Identical SWHSs were installed side by side at the Univers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Evangelos I. Sakellariou, Petros J. Axaopoulos, Bill Vaneck Bot, Kosmas A. Kavadias
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/431
_version_ 1797625829825445888
author Evangelos I. Sakellariou
Petros J. Axaopoulos
Bill Vaneck Bot
Kosmas A. Kavadias
author_facet Evangelos I. Sakellariou
Petros J. Axaopoulos
Bill Vaneck Bot
Kosmas A. Kavadias
author_sort Evangelos I. Sakellariou
collection DOAJ
description The main categories of solar water heating systems (SWHSs) are the thermosyphon and the forced circulation (FC). This paper presents an experiment carried out with the aim to compare the energy performance of the FC with a thermosyphon SHWS. Identical SWHSs were installed side by side at the University of West Attica in Athens, Greece. Domestic hot water load was applied to both systems via a microcontroller-based dispensing unit which mimics the demand profile. The trial period comprised the last two months of spring (April and May). For the first law assessment, two energy indicators were utilized: the solar fraction (SF) and the thermal efficiency of the system (η<sub>th</sub>). On days with distinctive weather conditions, both systems obtained approximately equal SF and η<sub>th</sub> values, without a specific preference between the ambient conditions and the type of SWHS. Regarding a four-day nonstop operation, the FC overperformed the thermosyphon system at both energy indicators. Namely, for the FC and the thermosyphon SWHS, the SF was calculated to be 0.62 and 0.48, and the η<sub>th</sub> was 68.2% and 53.3%, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:02:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7361fbcdf08c4a57825a9d519bcb1dcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:02:01Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-7361fbcdf08c4a57825a9d519bcb1dcd2023-11-16T15:19:04ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732022-12-0116143110.3390/en16010431First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical ThermosyphonEvangelos I. Sakellariou0Petros J. Axaopoulos1Bill Vaneck Bot2Kosmas A. Kavadias3Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Attica, 250, Thivon & P. Ralli Str., Campus Ancient Olive Grove, 12244 Athens, GreeceDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Attica, 250, Thivon & P. Ralli Str., Campus Ancient Olive Grove, 12244 Athens, GreeceLaboratory of Energy, Materials, Modelling and Methods, Higher National Polytechnic School, University of Douala, Douala P.O. Box 2701, CameroonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory of Soft Energy Applications & Environmental Protection, University of West Attica, 250, Thivon & P. Ralli Str., Campus Ancient Olive Grove, 12244 Athens, GreeceThe main categories of solar water heating systems (SWHSs) are the thermosyphon and the forced circulation (FC). This paper presents an experiment carried out with the aim to compare the energy performance of the FC with a thermosyphon SHWS. Identical SWHSs were installed side by side at the University of West Attica in Athens, Greece. Domestic hot water load was applied to both systems via a microcontroller-based dispensing unit which mimics the demand profile. The trial period comprised the last two months of spring (April and May). For the first law assessment, two energy indicators were utilized: the solar fraction (SF) and the thermal efficiency of the system (η<sub>th</sub>). On days with distinctive weather conditions, both systems obtained approximately equal SF and η<sub>th</sub> values, without a specific preference between the ambient conditions and the type of SWHS. Regarding a four-day nonstop operation, the FC overperformed the thermosyphon system at both energy indicators. Namely, for the FC and the thermosyphon SWHS, the SF was calculated to be 0.62 and 0.48, and the η<sub>th</sub> was 68.2% and 53.3%, respectively.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/431solar water heating systemsthermosyphonforce circulatedsolar fractionthermal efficiencyfirst law analysis
spellingShingle Evangelos I. Sakellariou
Petros J. Axaopoulos
Bill Vaneck Bot
Kosmas A. Kavadias
First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical Thermosyphon
Energies
solar water heating systems
thermosyphon
force circulated
solar fraction
thermal efficiency
first law analysis
title First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical Thermosyphon
title_full First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical Thermosyphon
title_fullStr First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical Thermosyphon
title_full_unstemmed First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical Thermosyphon
title_short First Law Comparison of a Forced-Circulation Solar Water Heating System with an Identical Thermosyphon
title_sort first law comparison of a forced circulation solar water heating system with an identical thermosyphon
topic solar water heating systems
thermosyphon
force circulated
solar fraction
thermal efficiency
first law analysis
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/1/431
work_keys_str_mv AT evangelosisakellariou firstlawcomparisonofaforcedcirculationsolarwaterheatingsystemwithanidenticalthermosyphon
AT petrosjaxaopoulos firstlawcomparisonofaforcedcirculationsolarwaterheatingsystemwithanidenticalthermosyphon
AT billvaneckbot firstlawcomparisonofaforcedcirculationsolarwaterheatingsystemwithanidenticalthermosyphon
AT kosmasakavadias firstlawcomparisonofaforcedcirculationsolarwaterheatingsystemwithanidenticalthermosyphon