Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Japan

Background Despite recent progress in the treatment of ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, data on geographic disparities application of the evidence‐based therapy remain limited. Methods and Results The J‐PCI (Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) registry is a nationwide registry to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyohei Yamaji, Shun Kohsaka, Taku Inohara, Yohei Numasawa, Hideki Ishii, Tetsuya Amano, Yuji Ikari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.016952
_version_ 1818775120671408128
author Kyohei Yamaji
Shun Kohsaka
Taku Inohara
Yohei Numasawa
Hideki Ishii
Tetsuya Amano
Yuji Ikari
author_facet Kyohei Yamaji
Shun Kohsaka
Taku Inohara
Yohei Numasawa
Hideki Ishii
Tetsuya Amano
Yuji Ikari
author_sort Kyohei Yamaji
collection DOAJ
description Background Despite recent progress in the treatment of ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, data on geographic disparities application of the evidence‐based therapy remain limited. Methods and Results The J‐PCI (Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) registry is a nationwide registry to assure the quality of delivered care. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 209 521 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction in 1126 institutions. The patients were divided into tertiles according to the population density (PD) of the percutaneous coronary intervention institution location (low: <951.7/km2, n = 69 797; medium: 951.7–4729.7/km2, n = 69 750; high: ≥4729.7/km2, n = 69 974). Patients treated in high PD administrative districts were younger and more likely to be male. No significant correlation was observed between PD and door‐to‐balloon time (regression coefficients: 0.036 per 1000 people/km2; 95% CI, −0.232 to 0.304; P = 0.79). Patients treated in low‐PD areas had higher crude in‐hospital mortality rates than those treated in high‐PD areas (low: 2.89%; medium: 2.60%; high: 2.38%; P < 0.001); PD and in‐hospital mortality had a significantly inverse association, before and after adjusting for baseline characteristics (crude odds ratio [OR], 0.983 per 1000/km2; 95% CI, 0.973–0.992; P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 0.980 per 1000/km2; 95% CI, 0.964–0.996; P = 0.01, respectively). Higher‐PD districts had more operators per institution (low: 6; interquartile range, 3–10; medium: 7; IQR, 3–13; high: 8; IQR, 5–13; P < 0.001), suggesting an inverse association with in‐hospital mortality (OR, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.986–0.999; P = 0.03). Conclusions Geographic inequality was observed in in‐hospital mortality of patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Variation in the number of operators per institution, rather than traditional quality indicators (eg, door‐to‐balloon time) might explain the difference in in‐hospital mortality.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T10:51:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73635371a8b34e8b9a91125029f9c790
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T10:51:59Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-73635371a8b34e8b9a91125029f9c7902022-12-21T21:10:26ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802020-08-0191510.1161/JAHA.120.016952Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in JapanKyohei Yamaji0Shun Kohsaka1Taku Inohara2Yohei Numasawa3Hideki Ishii4Tetsuya Amano5Yuji Ikari6Division of Cardiology Kokura Memorial Hospital Kitakyushu JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Keio University School of Medicine Tokyo JapanDepartment of Cardiology Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital Ashikaga JapanDepartment of Cardiology Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital Nagoya JapanDepartment of Cardiology Aichi Medical University Aichi JapanDepartment of Cardiology Tokai University School of Medicine Kanagawa JapanBackground Despite recent progress in the treatment of ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, data on geographic disparities application of the evidence‐based therapy remain limited. Methods and Results The J‐PCI (Japanese Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) registry is a nationwide registry to assure the quality of delivered care. Between January 2014 and December 2018, 209 521 patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction in 1126 institutions. The patients were divided into tertiles according to the population density (PD) of the percutaneous coronary intervention institution location (low: <951.7/km2, n = 69 797; medium: 951.7–4729.7/km2, n = 69 750; high: ≥4729.7/km2, n = 69 974). Patients treated in high PD administrative districts were younger and more likely to be male. No significant correlation was observed between PD and door‐to‐balloon time (regression coefficients: 0.036 per 1000 people/km2; 95% CI, −0.232 to 0.304; P = 0.79). Patients treated in low‐PD areas had higher crude in‐hospital mortality rates than those treated in high‐PD areas (low: 2.89%; medium: 2.60%; high: 2.38%; P < 0.001); PD and in‐hospital mortality had a significantly inverse association, before and after adjusting for baseline characteristics (crude odds ratio [OR], 0.983 per 1000/km2; 95% CI, 0.973–0.992; P < 0.001; adjusted OR, 0.980 per 1000/km2; 95% CI, 0.964–0.996; P = 0.01, respectively). Higher‐PD districts had more operators per institution (low: 6; interquartile range, 3–10; medium: 7; IQR, 3–13; high: 8; IQR, 5–13; P < 0.001), suggesting an inverse association with in‐hospital mortality (OR, 0.992; 95% CI, 0.986–0.999; P = 0.03). Conclusions Geographic inequality was observed in in‐hospital mortality of patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Variation in the number of operators per institution, rather than traditional quality indicators (eg, door‐to‐balloon time) might explain the difference in in‐hospital mortality.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.016952percutaneous coronary interventionpopulation studiesST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction
spellingShingle Kyohei Yamaji
Shun Kohsaka
Taku Inohara
Yohei Numasawa
Hideki Ishii
Tetsuya Amano
Yuji Ikari
Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Japan
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
percutaneous coronary intervention
population studies
ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction
title Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Japan
title_full Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Japan
title_fullStr Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Japan
title_short Population Density Analysis of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Japan
title_sort population density analysis of percutaneous coronary intervention for st segment elevation myocardial infarction in japan
topic percutaneous coronary intervention
population studies
ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.016952
work_keys_str_mv AT kyoheiyamaji populationdensityanalysisofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninjapan
AT shunkohsaka populationdensityanalysisofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninjapan
AT takuinohara populationdensityanalysisofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninjapan
AT yoheinumasawa populationdensityanalysisofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninjapan
AT hidekiishii populationdensityanalysisofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninjapan
AT tetsuyaamano populationdensityanalysisofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninjapan
AT yujiikari populationdensityanalysisofpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionforstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctioninjapan