Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying Quality

Tornado outbreaks (TOs) are a major hazard to life and property for locations east of the Rocky Mountains. Improving tornado outbreak (TO) forecasts will help minimize risks associated with these major events. In this study, we present a methodology for quantifying TO forecasts of varying quality, b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrew Mercer, Alyssa Bates
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-01-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/1/16
_version_ 1818187121920311296
author Andrew Mercer
Alyssa Bates
author_facet Andrew Mercer
Alyssa Bates
author_sort Andrew Mercer
collection DOAJ
description Tornado outbreaks (TOs) are a major hazard to life and property for locations east of the Rocky Mountains. Improving tornado outbreak (TO) forecasts will help minimize risks associated with these major events. In this study, we present a methodology for quantifying TO forecasts of varying quality, based on Storm Prediction Center convective outlook forecasts, and provide synoptic and mesoscale composite analyses to identify important features characterizing these events. Synoptic-scale composites from the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) are presented for TO forecasts at three forecast quality levels, H-class (high quality), M-class (medium quality), and L-class (low quality), as well as false alarm TO forecasts. H-class and false alarm TO forecasts share many meteorological similarities, particularly in the synoptic-scale, though false alarm events show less well-defined low-level synoptic-scale features. M- and L-class TOs present environments dominated by mesoscale thermodynamic processes (particularly dryline structures), contrasting H-class TOs which are clearly synoptically driven. Simulations of these composites reveal higher instability in M- and L-class TOs that lack key kinematic structures that characterize H-class TOs. The results presented offer important forecast feedback that can help inform future TO predictions and ultimately produce improved TO forecast quality.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T23:06:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73794566c309479cbdc2d178e122c246
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T23:06:00Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-73794566c309479cbdc2d178e122c2462022-12-22T00:46:56ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332019-01-011011610.3390/atmos10010016atmos10010016Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying QualityAndrew Mercer0Alyssa Bates1Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 200B Hilbun Hall Mississippi State, MS 39762, USACooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies, Norman, OK 73072, USATornado outbreaks (TOs) are a major hazard to life and property for locations east of the Rocky Mountains. Improving tornado outbreak (TO) forecasts will help minimize risks associated with these major events. In this study, we present a methodology for quantifying TO forecasts of varying quality, based on Storm Prediction Center convective outlook forecasts, and provide synoptic and mesoscale composite analyses to identify important features characterizing these events. Synoptic-scale composites from the North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) are presented for TO forecasts at three forecast quality levels, H-class (high quality), M-class (medium quality), and L-class (low quality), as well as false alarm TO forecasts. H-class and false alarm TO forecasts share many meteorological similarities, particularly in the synoptic-scale, though false alarm events show less well-defined low-level synoptic-scale features. M- and L-class TOs present environments dominated by mesoscale thermodynamic processes (particularly dryline structures), contrasting H-class TOs which are clearly synoptically driven. Simulations of these composites reveal higher instability in M- and L-class TOs that lack key kinematic structures that characterize H-class TOs. The results presented offer important forecast feedback that can help inform future TO predictions and ultimately produce improved TO forecast quality.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/1/16principal component analysistornado outbreakssynoptic-scale diagnosisforecast quality
spellingShingle Andrew Mercer
Alyssa Bates
Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying Quality
Atmosphere
principal component analysis
tornado outbreaks
synoptic-scale diagnosis
forecast quality
title Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying Quality
title_full Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying Quality
title_fullStr Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying Quality
title_full_unstemmed Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying Quality
title_short Meteorological Differences Characterizing Tornado Outbreak Forecasts of Varying Quality
title_sort meteorological differences characterizing tornado outbreak forecasts of varying quality
topic principal component analysis
tornado outbreaks
synoptic-scale diagnosis
forecast quality
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/10/1/16
work_keys_str_mv AT andrewmercer meteorologicaldifferencescharacterizingtornadooutbreakforecastsofvaryingquality
AT alyssabates meteorologicaldifferencescharacterizingtornadooutbreakforecastsofvaryingquality