Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>No consensus exists on how rehabilitation programs for lumbar discectomy patients with persistent complaints after surgery should be composed. A better understanding of normal and abnormal postoperative trunk muscle condition might h...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/65 |
_version_ | 1819155552175915008 |
---|---|
author | Verstraete Koenraad Cambier Dirk C Caemaert Jacques J Coorevits Pascal L Stevens Veerle K Vanovermeire Olivier Bouche Katie GW Vanderstraeten Guy G Danneels Lieven A |
author_facet | Verstraete Koenraad Cambier Dirk C Caemaert Jacques J Coorevits Pascal L Stevens Veerle K Vanovermeire Olivier Bouche Katie GW Vanderstraeten Guy G Danneels Lieven A |
author_sort | Verstraete Koenraad |
collection | DOAJ |
description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>No consensus exists on how rehabilitation programs for lumbar discectomy patients with persistent complaints after surgery should be composed. A better understanding of normal and abnormal postoperative trunk muscle condition might help direct the treatment goals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A three-dimensional CT scan of the lumbar spine was obtained in 18 symptomatic and 18 asymptomatic patients who had undergone a lumbar discectomy 42 months to 83 months (median 63 months) previously. The psoas muscle (PS), the paraspinal muscle mass (PA) and the multifidus muscle (MF) were outlined at the L3, L4 and L5 level. Of these muscles, fat free Cross Sectional Area (CSA) and fat CSA were determined. CSA of the lumbar erector spinae (LES = longissimus thoracis + iliocostalis lumborum) was calculated by subtracting MF CSA from PA CSA. Mean muscle CSA of the left and right sides was calculated at each level. To normalize the data for interpersonal comparison, the mean CSA was divided by the CSA of the L3 vertebral body (mCSA = normalized fat-free muscle CSA; fCSA = normalized fat CSA). Differences in CSA between the pain group and the pain free group were examined using a General Linear Model (GLM). Three levels were examined to investigate the possible role of the level of operation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In lumbar discectomy patients with pain, the mCSA of the MF was significantly smaller than in pain-free subjects (<it>p </it>= 0.009) independently of the level. The mCSA of the LES was significantly smaller in pain patients, but only on the L3 slice (p = 0.018). No significant difference in mCSA of the PS was found between pain patients and pain-free patients (p = 0.462). The fCSA of the MF (<it>p </it>= 0.186) and of the LES (p = 0.256) were not significantly different between both populations. However, the fCSA of the PS was significantly larger in pain patients than in pain-free patients. (p = 0.012).</p> <p>The level of operation was never a significant factor.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>CT comparison of MF, LES and PS muscle condition between lumbar discectomy patients without pain and patients with protracted postoperative pain showed a smaller fat-free muscle CSA of the MF at all levels examined, a smaller fat- free muscle CSA of the LES at the L3 level, and more fat in the PS in patients with pain. The level of operation was not found to be of importance. The present results suggest a general lumbar muscle dysfunction in the pain group, in particular of the deep stabilizing muscle system.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T15:38:47Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-738bf1d6544d47d2ba6235387b28df51 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2474 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T15:38:47Z |
publishDate | 2011-03-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
spelling | doaj.art-738bf1d6544d47d2ba6235387b28df512022-12-21T18:21:11ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742011-03-011216510.1186/1471-2474-12-65Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patientsVerstraete KoenraadCambier Dirk CCaemaert Jacques JCoorevits Pascal LStevens Veerle KVanovermeire OlivierBouche Katie GWVanderstraeten Guy GDanneels Lieven A<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>No consensus exists on how rehabilitation programs for lumbar discectomy patients with persistent complaints after surgery should be composed. A better understanding of normal and abnormal postoperative trunk muscle condition might help direct the treatment goals.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A three-dimensional CT scan of the lumbar spine was obtained in 18 symptomatic and 18 asymptomatic patients who had undergone a lumbar discectomy 42 months to 83 months (median 63 months) previously. The psoas muscle (PS), the paraspinal muscle mass (PA) and the multifidus muscle (MF) were outlined at the L3, L4 and L5 level. Of these muscles, fat free Cross Sectional Area (CSA) and fat CSA were determined. CSA of the lumbar erector spinae (LES = longissimus thoracis + iliocostalis lumborum) was calculated by subtracting MF CSA from PA CSA. Mean muscle CSA of the left and right sides was calculated at each level. To normalize the data for interpersonal comparison, the mean CSA was divided by the CSA of the L3 vertebral body (mCSA = normalized fat-free muscle CSA; fCSA = normalized fat CSA). Differences in CSA between the pain group and the pain free group were examined using a General Linear Model (GLM). Three levels were examined to investigate the possible role of the level of operation.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In lumbar discectomy patients with pain, the mCSA of the MF was significantly smaller than in pain-free subjects (<it>p </it>= 0.009) independently of the level. The mCSA of the LES was significantly smaller in pain patients, but only on the L3 slice (p = 0.018). No significant difference in mCSA of the PS was found between pain patients and pain-free patients (p = 0.462). The fCSA of the MF (<it>p </it>= 0.186) and of the LES (p = 0.256) were not significantly different between both populations. However, the fCSA of the PS was significantly larger in pain patients than in pain-free patients. (p = 0.012).</p> <p>The level of operation was never a significant factor.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>CT comparison of MF, LES and PS muscle condition between lumbar discectomy patients without pain and patients with protracted postoperative pain showed a smaller fat-free muscle CSA of the MF at all levels examined, a smaller fat- free muscle CSA of the LES at the L3 level, and more fat in the PS in patients with pain. The level of operation was not found to be of importance. The present results suggest a general lumbar muscle dysfunction in the pain group, in particular of the deep stabilizing muscle system.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/65 |
spellingShingle | Verstraete Koenraad Cambier Dirk C Caemaert Jacques J Coorevits Pascal L Stevens Veerle K Vanovermeire Olivier Bouche Katie GW Vanderstraeten Guy G Danneels Lieven A Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
title | Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients |
title_full | Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients |
title_fullStr | Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients |
title_short | Computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients |
title_sort | computed tomographic analysis of the quality of trunk muscles in asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar discectomy patients |
url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/12/65 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verstraetekoenraad computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT cambierdirkc computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT caemaertjacquesj computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT coorevitspascall computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT stevensveerlek computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT vanovermeireolivier computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT bouchekatiegw computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT vanderstraetenguyg computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients AT danneelslievena computedtomographicanalysisofthequalityoftrunkmusclesinasymptomaticandsymptomaticlumbardiscectomypatients |