Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery

Background: Nowadays, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) are known to be safe and efficient surgical procedures to treat early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed whether RATS increased disease-free survival (DFS) compared...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: François Montagne, Zied Chaari, Benjamin Bottet, Matthieu Sarsam, Frankie Mbadinga, Jean Selim, Florian Guisier, André Gillibert, Jean-Marc Baste
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/11/2611
_version_ 1797493979045953536
author François Montagne
Zied Chaari
Benjamin Bottet
Matthieu Sarsam
Frankie Mbadinga
Jean Selim
Florian Guisier
André Gillibert
Jean-Marc Baste
author_facet François Montagne
Zied Chaari
Benjamin Bottet
Matthieu Sarsam
Frankie Mbadinga
Jean Selim
Florian Guisier
André Gillibert
Jean-Marc Baste
author_sort François Montagne
collection DOAJ
description Background: Nowadays, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) are known to be safe and efficient surgical procedures to treat early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed whether RATS increased disease-free survival (DFS) compared with VATS for lobectomy and segmentectomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated for resectable NSCLC performed by RATS or VATS, in our tertiary care center from 2012 to 2019. Patients’ data were prospectively recorded and reviewed in the French EPITHOR database. Primary outcomes were 5-year DFS for lobectomy and 3-year DFS for segmentectomy, compared by propensity-score adjusted difference of Kaplan–Meier estimates. Results: Among 844 lung resections, 436 VATS and 234 RATS lobectomies and 46 VATS and 128 RATS segmentectomies were performed. For lobectomy, the adjusted 5-year DFS was 60.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52.9–68.8%) for VATS and 52.7% (95%CI 41.7–63.7%) for RATS, with a difference estimated at −8.3% (−22.2–+4.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.24). For segmentectomy, the adjusted 3-year DFS was 84.6% (95%CI 69.8–99.0%) for VATS and 72.9% (95%CI 50.6–92.4%) for RATS, with a difference estimated at −11.7% (−38.7–+7.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.21). Conclusions: RATS failed to show its superiority over VATS for resectable NSCLC.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:27:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-739200d82d5c4f1896df62f9de2610ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:27:45Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-739200d82d5c4f1896df62f9de2610ab2023-11-23T13:48:12ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942022-05-011411261110.3390/cancers14112611Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted SurgeryFrançois Montagne0Zied Chaari1Benjamin Bottet2Matthieu Sarsam3Frankie Mbadinga4Jean Selim5Florian Guisier6André Gillibert7Jean-Marc Baste8Department of Thoracic Surgery, CHU Lille, F-59000 Lille, FranceDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Sfax, Habib Bourguiba University Hospital, Sfax 3029, TunisiaDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, FranceDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, FranceDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, FranceDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, CHU Rouen, F-76000 Rouen, FranceThoracic Oncology and Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pneumology, Rouen University Hospital, F-76000 Rouen, FranceDepartment of Biostatistics, CHU Rouen, F-76000 Rouen, FranceDepartment of General and Thoracic Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, 1 Rue de Germont, F-76000 Rouen, FranceBackground: Nowadays, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) are known to be safe and efficient surgical procedures to treat early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed whether RATS increased disease-free survival (DFS) compared with VATS for lobectomy and segmentectomy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated for resectable NSCLC performed by RATS or VATS, in our tertiary care center from 2012 to 2019. Patients’ data were prospectively recorded and reviewed in the French EPITHOR database. Primary outcomes were 5-year DFS for lobectomy and 3-year DFS for segmentectomy, compared by propensity-score adjusted difference of Kaplan–Meier estimates. Results: Among 844 lung resections, 436 VATS and 234 RATS lobectomies and 46 VATS and 128 RATS segmentectomies were performed. For lobectomy, the adjusted 5-year DFS was 60.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52.9–68.8%) for VATS and 52.7% (95%CI 41.7–63.7%) for RATS, with a difference estimated at −8.3% (−22.2–+4.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.24). For segmentectomy, the adjusted 3-year DFS was 84.6% (95%CI 69.8–99.0%) for VATS and 72.9% (95%CI 50.6–92.4%) for RATS, with a difference estimated at −11.7% (−38.7–+7.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.21). Conclusions: RATS failed to show its superiority over VATS for resectable NSCLC.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/11/2611non-small cell lung cancerlong-term survivaldisease-free survivalminimally invasive surgeryVATSRATS
spellingShingle François Montagne
Zied Chaari
Benjamin Bottet
Matthieu Sarsam
Frankie Mbadinga
Jean Selim
Florian Guisier
André Gillibert
Jean-Marc Baste
Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery
Cancers
non-small cell lung cancer
long-term survival
disease-free survival
minimally invasive surgery
VATS
RATS
title Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery
title_full Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery
title_fullStr Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery
title_short Long-Term Survival Following Minimally Invasive Lung Cancer Surgery: Comparing Robotic-Assisted and Video-Assisted Surgery
title_sort long term survival following minimally invasive lung cancer surgery comparing robotic assisted and video assisted surgery
topic non-small cell lung cancer
long-term survival
disease-free survival
minimally invasive surgery
VATS
RATS
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/11/2611
work_keys_str_mv AT francoismontagne longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT ziedchaari longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT benjaminbottet longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT matthieusarsam longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT frankiembadinga longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT jeanselim longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT florianguisier longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT andregillibert longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery
AT jeanmarcbaste longtermsurvivalfollowingminimallyinvasivelungcancersurgerycomparingroboticassistedandvideoassistedsurgery