A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International Politics
The symbolic significance of membership in NATO is widely recognized by Russian and foreign experts. However, attempts to systematically assess its role as a marker of the political status has not been made. This article intends to fill this gap, considering not only positive, but also negative cons...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MGIMO University Press
2019-05-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/923 |
| _version_ | 1826849182559764480 |
|---|---|
| author | I. A. Istomin I. V. Bolgova A. P. Sokolov V. A. Avatkov |
| author_facet | I. A. Istomin I. V. Bolgova A. P. Sokolov V. A. Avatkov |
| author_sort | I. A. Istomin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The symbolic significance of membership in NATO is widely recognized by Russian and foreign experts. However, attempts to systematically assess its role as a marker of the political status has not been made. This article intends to fill this gap, considering not only positive, but also negative consequences of symbolic capital associated with the NATO membership. In order to determine the possible contradictions, benefits and costs for states from participating in the alliance, the authors examined the record of its three participants – France, Germany and Turkey. The comparison of these three cases enables to trace various status consequences of participation in a bloc for players whose material capacities and overall symbolic capital in the international system undergo different transitions. The theoretical literature and empirical record of the selected NATO members confirm that states compete in the international system for highly differentiated symbolic capital embodying various kinds of recognition. Status markers are complex social constructs, combining various political meanings. Meanwhile, states are not always able to control which types of social recognition will be activated by their inclusion in particular institutions. Despite the fact, that they may be interested only in some of the meanings associated with a status marker, they are compelled to take into account its other political connotations. As a result, NATO membership could bear for states a range of various social consequences. This could lead to a situation when several of them are equally relevant for the same actor, but some contain positive value, while others are assessed negatively. In addition, actors could face a contradiction between the status and practical consequences of participation in the alliance. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T05:10:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-73adf0ebadea455396143340eb839eeb |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2071-8160 2541-9099 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-16T15:52:26Z |
| publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
| publisher | MGIMO University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta |
| spelling | doaj.art-73adf0ebadea455396143340eb839eeb2025-01-30T12:15:51ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602541-90992019-05-0102(65)578510.24833/2071-8160-2019-2-65-57-85842A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International PoliticsI. A. Istomin0I. V. Bolgova1A. P. Sokolov2V. A. Avatkov3Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University).Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO-University).Moscow State Linguistic University.Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia.The symbolic significance of membership in NATO is widely recognized by Russian and foreign experts. However, attempts to systematically assess its role as a marker of the political status has not been made. This article intends to fill this gap, considering not only positive, but also negative consequences of symbolic capital associated with the NATO membership. In order to determine the possible contradictions, benefits and costs for states from participating in the alliance, the authors examined the record of its three participants – France, Germany and Turkey. The comparison of these three cases enables to trace various status consequences of participation in a bloc for players whose material capacities and overall symbolic capital in the international system undergo different transitions. The theoretical literature and empirical record of the selected NATO members confirm that states compete in the international system for highly differentiated symbolic capital embodying various kinds of recognition. Status markers are complex social constructs, combining various political meanings. Meanwhile, states are not always able to control which types of social recognition will be activated by their inclusion in particular institutions. Despite the fact, that they may be interested only in some of the meanings associated with a status marker, they are compelled to take into account its other political connotations. As a result, NATO membership could bear for states a range of various social consequences. This could lead to a situation when several of them are equally relevant for the same actor, but some contain positive value, while others are assessed negatively. In addition, actors could face a contradiction between the status and practical consequences of participation in the alliance.https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/923natomilitary-political alliancesymbolic capitalstatusinternational institutionsstatus markersfrancegermanyturkey |
| spellingShingle | I. A. Istomin I. V. Bolgova A. P. Sokolov V. A. Avatkov A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International Politics Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta nato military-political alliance symbolic capital status international institutions status markers france germany turkey |
| title | A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International Politics |
| title_full | A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International Politics |
| title_fullStr | A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International Politics |
| title_full_unstemmed | A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International Politics |
| title_short | A «Badge of Honour» or a «Stamp of Infamy»? NATO As A Marker of Status in International Politics |
| title_sort | badge of honour or a stamp of infamy nato as a marker of status in international politics |
| topic | nato military-political alliance symbolic capital status international institutions status markers france germany turkey |
| url | https://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/923 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT iaistomin abadgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics AT ivbolgova abadgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics AT apsokolov abadgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics AT vaavatkov abadgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics AT iaistomin badgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics AT ivbolgova badgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics AT apsokolov badgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics AT vaavatkov badgeofhonourorastampofinfamynatoasamarkerofstatusininternationalpolitics |