Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci

Introduction: Macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of staphylococcal infections. Some genes like erm, msr, and lnu confer resistance to these group antibiotics. Resistance phenotype can be one of the constitutive, inducible or efflux pheno...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Güliz UYAR GÜLEÇ, Serkan ÖNCÜ, Bülent BOZDOĞAN, Barçın ÖZTÜRK, Bülent ERTUĞRUL, Serhan SAKARYA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi 2020-06-01
Series:Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.floradergisi.org/managete/fu_folder/2020-02/2020-25-02-190-196.pdf
_version_ 1797917538597732352
author Güliz UYAR GÜLEÇ
Serkan ÖNCÜ
Bülent BOZDOĞAN
Barçın ÖZTÜRK
Bülent ERTUĞRUL
Serhan SAKARYA
author_facet Güliz UYAR GÜLEÇ
Serkan ÖNCÜ
Bülent BOZDOĞAN
Barçın ÖZTÜRK
Bülent ERTUĞRUL
Serhan SAKARYA
author_sort Güliz UYAR GÜLEÇ
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of staphylococcal infections. Some genes like erm, msr, and lnu confer resistance to these group antibiotics. Resistance phenotype can be one of the constitutive, inducible or efflux phenotypes. Resistance rates have been reported at varying rates from various countries. This study aimed to detect MLSB resistance rates, phenotypes, and genotypes in clinical isolates of both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). Materials and Methods: A total of 82 staphylococci strains comprising 65.8% (n= 54) S. aureus and 34.2% (n= 28) CNS were identified by conventional methods and 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Antibiotic susceptibility testing for erythromycin, lincomycin, gentamicin, fusidic acid, levofloxacin, vancomycin, and linezolid was performed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) agar dilution method. Double-disc diffusion test (D-test) was applied to investigate MLSB resistance phenotypes. In erythromycin-resistant isolates, PCR was used to detect the presence of ermA, ermB, ermC, and msrA genes. Results: Among 54 S. aureus strains, 51% (n= 28) were methicillin-resistant and 49% (n= 26) were methicillin-susceptible. Among 28 CNS, 50% (n= 14) were methicillin-resistant. Erythromycin, lincomycin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin resistance rates were higher in the methicillin-resistant group (p< 0.05). Erythromycin resistance rate was 54.9%. Rates of constitutive and inducible MLSB and MSB phenotypes were 30.5%, 18.3%, and 6.1%, respectively. The most prevalent resistance determinants were ermA (32.9%) and ermC (7.3%). In addition, gene combinations were detected. Conclusion: Due to the wide geographic distribution of resistance phenotypes and genotypes, local statistics are of critical value for empiric therapy. Double-disc diffusion test is useful to guide interpretation of the susceptibility test.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T13:14:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73bd7d1cedf64b95bf22145a469f0cbc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1300-932X
1300-932X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T13:14:42Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Bilimsel Tip Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
spelling doaj.art-73bd7d1cedf64b95bf22145a469f0cbc2023-02-15T16:12:25ZengBilimsel Tip YayineviFlora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi1300-932X1300-932X2020-06-0125219019610.5578/flora.68683Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of StaphylococciGüliz UYAR GÜLEÇ0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-1042Serkan ÖNCÜ1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7815-8620Bülent BOZDOĞAN2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2469-9728Barçın ÖZTÜRK3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3756-8276Bülent ERTUĞRUL4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6372-6680Serhan SAKARYA5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-9211Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın, TurkeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın, TurkeyDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın, TurkeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın, TurkeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın, TurkeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın, TurkeyIntroduction: Macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics are commonly used in the treatment of staphylococcal infections. Some genes like erm, msr, and lnu confer resistance to these group antibiotics. Resistance phenotype can be one of the constitutive, inducible or efflux phenotypes. Resistance rates have been reported at varying rates from various countries. This study aimed to detect MLSB resistance rates, phenotypes, and genotypes in clinical isolates of both Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS). Materials and Methods: A total of 82 staphylococci strains comprising 65.8% (n= 54) S. aureus and 34.2% (n= 28) CNS were identified by conventional methods and 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Antibiotic susceptibility testing for erythromycin, lincomycin, gentamicin, fusidic acid, levofloxacin, vancomycin, and linezolid was performed by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) agar dilution method. Double-disc diffusion test (D-test) was applied to investigate MLSB resistance phenotypes. In erythromycin-resistant isolates, PCR was used to detect the presence of ermA, ermB, ermC, and msrA genes. Results: Among 54 S. aureus strains, 51% (n= 28) were methicillin-resistant and 49% (n= 26) were methicillin-susceptible. Among 28 CNS, 50% (n= 14) were methicillin-resistant. Erythromycin, lincomycin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin resistance rates were higher in the methicillin-resistant group (p< 0.05). Erythromycin resistance rate was 54.9%. Rates of constitutive and inducible MLSB and MSB phenotypes were 30.5%, 18.3%, and 6.1%, respectively. The most prevalent resistance determinants were ermA (32.9%) and ermC (7.3%). In addition, gene combinations were detected. Conclusion: Due to the wide geographic distribution of resistance phenotypes and genotypes, local statistics are of critical value for empiric therapy. Double-disc diffusion test is useful to guide interpretation of the susceptibility test.http://www.floradergisi.org/managete/fu_folder/2020-02/2020-25-02-190-196.pdfd-testerm genesmlsb resistancestaphylococci
spellingShingle Güliz UYAR GÜLEÇ
Serkan ÖNCÜ
Bülent BOZDOĞAN
Barçın ÖZTÜRK
Bülent ERTUĞRUL
Serhan SAKARYA
Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci
Flora Infeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi
d-test
erm genes
mlsb resistance
staphylococci
title Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci
title_full Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci
title_fullStr Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci
title_full_unstemmed Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci
title_short Phenotypic and Molecular Detection of Macrolide Lincosamide Streptogramin B Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococci
title_sort phenotypic and molecular detection of macrolide lincosamide streptogramin b resistance in clinical isolates of staphylococci
topic d-test
erm genes
mlsb resistance
staphylococci
url http://www.floradergisi.org/managete/fu_folder/2020-02/2020-25-02-190-196.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT gulizuyargulec phenotypicandmoleculardetectionofmacrolidelincosamidestreptograminbresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococci
AT serkanoncu phenotypicandmoleculardetectionofmacrolidelincosamidestreptograminbresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococci
AT bulentbozdogan phenotypicandmoleculardetectionofmacrolidelincosamidestreptograminbresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococci
AT barcınozturk phenotypicandmoleculardetectionofmacrolidelincosamidestreptograminbresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococci
AT bulentertugrul phenotypicandmoleculardetectionofmacrolidelincosamidestreptograminbresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococci
AT serhansakarya phenotypicandmoleculardetectionofmacrolidelincosamidestreptograminbresistanceinclinicalisolatesofstaphylococci