Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials
Aim: This study evaluated the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine as root-end filling materials. Method: In total, twenty (N = 20) extracted human maxillary central incisor teeth were decontaminated, cleaned and decoronated. Instrumentation was performed according to the step back techniqu...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Saudi Dental Journal |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218301111 |
_version_ | 1818998878444191744 |
---|---|
author | Mohamed Nabeel Hossam M. Tawfik Ashraf M.A. Abu-Seida Abeer A. Elgendy |
author_facet | Mohamed Nabeel Hossam M. Tawfik Ashraf M.A. Abu-Seida Abeer A. Elgendy |
author_sort | Mohamed Nabeel |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim: This study evaluated the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine as root-end filling materials. Method: In total, twenty (N = 20) extracted human maxillary central incisor teeth were decontaminated, cleaned and decoronated. Instrumentation was performed according to the step back technique using #50 Flex-o-file. Then the canals were flared to #70 Flex-o-file. Obturation was performed with conventional gutta percha and a resinous sealer (AH26) using the lateral condensation technique. Resection of 3 mm of apical end of each root was achieved perpendicular to the long axis of the root. Root-end cavity was prepared in each sample ultrasonically then filled with tested materials (N = 10). Fluid filtration method was used to assess the sealing ability of each tested material at three different experimental periods; one day, one week and one month after setting. All data were tabulated and statistically analyzed with a level of significance set at P ≤ .05. Results: At each specific time interval, the leakage mean values were not consistent among the tested materials. At one day interval, ProRoot MTA samples had a higher leakage mean value than Biodentine samples. However, this difference in leakage was not statistically significant (P > .05). At one week interval, both materials showed an increased degree of leakage mean value with no significant difference (P > .05). At one month interval, ProRoot MTA samples showed a decrease in leakage mean value, while the Biodentine samples showed a further increase in leakage mean value. This difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusion: Although the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA is superior to Biodentine, Biodentine could be considered as an acceptable alternative to ProRoot MTA in peri-radicular surgeries. Keywords: Endodontic failure, Endodontic treatment, Fluid filtration method, Periapical pathosis, Root-end cavity preparations, Surgical endodontic |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:08:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-73c8b13d8cf34094a94ee9ca8178ca39 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1013-9052 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T22:08:31Z |
publishDate | 2019-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Saudi Dental Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-73c8b13d8cf34094a94ee9ca8178ca392022-12-21T19:25:12ZengElsevierSaudi Dental Journal1013-90522019-01-013111622Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materialsMohamed Nabeel0Hossam M. Tawfik1Ashraf M.A. Abu-Seida2Abeer A. Elgendy3Dept. of Endodontics, Faculty of Dental and Oral Medicine, Misr International University, Giza, EgyptDept. of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EgyptDept of Surgery, Anesthesiology & Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt; Corresponding author at: Cairo University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Giza, Giza Square, PO: 12211, Egypt.Dept. of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ain Shams University, Cairo, EgyptAim: This study evaluated the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine as root-end filling materials. Method: In total, twenty (N = 20) extracted human maxillary central incisor teeth were decontaminated, cleaned and decoronated. Instrumentation was performed according to the step back technique using #50 Flex-o-file. Then the canals were flared to #70 Flex-o-file. Obturation was performed with conventional gutta percha and a resinous sealer (AH26) using the lateral condensation technique. Resection of 3 mm of apical end of each root was achieved perpendicular to the long axis of the root. Root-end cavity was prepared in each sample ultrasonically then filled with tested materials (N = 10). Fluid filtration method was used to assess the sealing ability of each tested material at three different experimental periods; one day, one week and one month after setting. All data were tabulated and statistically analyzed with a level of significance set at P ≤ .05. Results: At each specific time interval, the leakage mean values were not consistent among the tested materials. At one day interval, ProRoot MTA samples had a higher leakage mean value than Biodentine samples. However, this difference in leakage was not statistically significant (P > .05). At one week interval, both materials showed an increased degree of leakage mean value with no significant difference (P > .05). At one month interval, ProRoot MTA samples showed a decrease in leakage mean value, while the Biodentine samples showed a further increase in leakage mean value. This difference was statistically significant (P < .05). Conclusion: Although the sealing ability of ProRoot MTA is superior to Biodentine, Biodentine could be considered as an acceptable alternative to ProRoot MTA in peri-radicular surgeries. Keywords: Endodontic failure, Endodontic treatment, Fluid filtration method, Periapical pathosis, Root-end cavity preparations, Surgical endodontichttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218301111 |
spellingShingle | Mohamed Nabeel Hossam M. Tawfik Ashraf M.A. Abu-Seida Abeer A. Elgendy Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials Saudi Dental Journal |
title | Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials |
title_full | Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials |
title_fullStr | Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials |
title_full_unstemmed | Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials |
title_short | Sealing ability of Biodentine versus ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling materials |
title_sort | sealing ability of biodentine versus proroot mineral trioxide aggregate as root end filling materials |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905218301111 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamednabeel sealingabilityofbiodentineversusprorootmineraltrioxideaggregateasrootendfillingmaterials AT hossammtawfik sealingabilityofbiodentineversusprorootmineraltrioxideaggregateasrootendfillingmaterials AT ashrafmaabuseida sealingabilityofbiodentineversusprorootmineraltrioxideaggregateasrootendfillingmaterials AT abeeraelgendy sealingabilityofbiodentineversusprorootmineraltrioxideaggregateasrootendfillingmaterials |