Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury

Abstract Objective To investigate if patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury and a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examination have a more favorable prognosis than those with a true-positive FAST. Methods This study included 97 consecutive patients with confi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed H. A. Alramdan, Derya Yakar, Frank F. A. IJpma, Ömer Kasalak, Thomas C. Kwee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-09-01
Series:Insights into Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-020-00911-5
_version_ 1818261375770689536
author Mohammed H. A. Alramdan
Derya Yakar
Frank F. A. IJpma
Ömer Kasalak
Thomas C. Kwee
author_facet Mohammed H. A. Alramdan
Derya Yakar
Frank F. A. IJpma
Ömer Kasalak
Thomas C. Kwee
author_sort Mohammed H. A. Alramdan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To investigate if patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury and a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examination have a more favorable prognosis than those with a true-positive FAST. Methods This study included 97 consecutive patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury (based on computed tomography [CT] and/or surgical findings) who underwent FAST. Results FAST was false-negative in 40 patients (41.2%) and true-positive in 57 patients (58.8%). Twenty-two patients (22.7%) had an unfavorable outcome (defined as the need for an interventional radiologic procedure, laparotomy, or death due to abdominal injury). Univariately, a false-negative FAST (odds ratio [OR] 0.24; p = 0.017) and a higher systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.97 per mmHg increase; p = 0.034) were significantly associated with a favorable outcome, whereas contrast extravasation on CT (OR, 7.17; p = 0.001) and shock index classification (OR, 1.89 for each higher class; p = 0.046) were significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome. Multivariately, only contrast extravasation on CT remained significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome (OR, 4.64; p = 0.016). When excluding contrast extravasation on CT from multivariate analysis, only a false-negative FAST result was predictive of a favorable outcome (OR, 0.28; p = 0.038). Conclusion Trauma patients with confirmed abdominal injury and a false-negative FAST have a better outcome than those with a positive FAST. FAST may be valuable for risk stratification and prognostication in patients with a high suspicion of abdominal injury when CT has not been performed yet or when CT is not available.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T18:46:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73e53c6ca6ca44ec95d8ee024fab1b6c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1869-4101
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T18:46:14Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Insights into Imaging
spelling doaj.art-73e53c6ca6ca44ec95d8ee024fab1b6c2022-12-22T00:15:31ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012020-09-011111910.1186/s13244-020-00911-5Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injuryMohammed H. A. Alramdan0Derya Yakar1Frank F. A. IJpma2Ömer Kasalak3Thomas C. Kwee4Medical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenMedical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenMedical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenMedical Imaging Center, Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenAbstract Objective To investigate if patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury and a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) examination have a more favorable prognosis than those with a true-positive FAST. Methods This study included 97 consecutive patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury (based on computed tomography [CT] and/or surgical findings) who underwent FAST. Results FAST was false-negative in 40 patients (41.2%) and true-positive in 57 patients (58.8%). Twenty-two patients (22.7%) had an unfavorable outcome (defined as the need for an interventional radiologic procedure, laparotomy, or death due to abdominal injury). Univariately, a false-negative FAST (odds ratio [OR] 0.24; p = 0.017) and a higher systolic blood pressure (OR, 0.97 per mmHg increase; p = 0.034) were significantly associated with a favorable outcome, whereas contrast extravasation on CT (OR, 7.17; p = 0.001) and shock index classification (OR, 1.89 for each higher class; p = 0.046) were significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome. Multivariately, only contrast extravasation on CT remained significantly associated with an unfavorable outcome (OR, 4.64; p = 0.016). When excluding contrast extravasation on CT from multivariate analysis, only a false-negative FAST result was predictive of a favorable outcome (OR, 0.28; p = 0.038). Conclusion Trauma patients with confirmed abdominal injury and a false-negative FAST have a better outcome than those with a positive FAST. FAST may be valuable for risk stratification and prognostication in patients with a high suspicion of abdominal injury when CT has not been performed yet or when CT is not available.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-020-00911-5AbdomenFAST examPatient outcome assessmentTraumaUltrasonography
spellingShingle Mohammed H. A. Alramdan
Derya Yakar
Frank F. A. IJpma
Ömer Kasalak
Thomas C. Kwee
Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury
Insights into Imaging
Abdomen
FAST exam
Patient outcome assessment
Trauma
Ultrasonography
title Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury
title_full Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury
title_fullStr Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury
title_short Predictive value of a false-negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury
title_sort predictive value of a false negative focused abdominal sonography for trauma fast result in patients with confirmed traumatic abdominal injury
topic Abdomen
FAST exam
Patient outcome assessment
Trauma
Ultrasonography
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-020-00911-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedhaalramdan predictivevalueofafalsenegativefocusedabdominalsonographyfortraumafastresultinpatientswithconfirmedtraumaticabdominalinjury
AT deryayakar predictivevalueofafalsenegativefocusedabdominalsonographyfortraumafastresultinpatientswithconfirmedtraumaticabdominalinjury
AT frankfaijpma predictivevalueofafalsenegativefocusedabdominalsonographyfortraumafastresultinpatientswithconfirmedtraumaticabdominalinjury
AT omerkasalak predictivevalueofafalsenegativefocusedabdominalsonographyfortraumafastresultinpatientswithconfirmedtraumaticabdominalinjury
AT thomasckwee predictivevalueofafalsenegativefocusedabdominalsonographyfortraumafastresultinpatientswithconfirmedtraumaticabdominalinjury