Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece

This study investigated the prioritization and ranking problem of the appropriate locations at which to deploy solar photovoltaic (PV) farms. Although different Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods can be found in the literature to address this problem, a comparative analysis of those method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dimitra G. Vagiona
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8371
_version_ 1797505048660410368
author Dimitra G. Vagiona
author_facet Dimitra G. Vagiona
author_sort Dimitra G. Vagiona
collection DOAJ
description This study investigated the prioritization and ranking problem of the appropriate locations at which to deploy solar photovoltaic (PV) farms. Although different Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods can be found in the literature to address this problem, a comparative analysis of those methods is missing. The aim of this study is to compare four different MCDM approaches to evaluate and rank suitable areas for the deployment of solar PV farms, with the island of Rhodes (Greece) being used as an example. Feasible areas for the location of such facilities were identified with the use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS), by applying certain exclusion criteria found either in the national legislative framework or in the international literature. Data were obtained from Greek open geospatial data. The feasible sites were evaluated and ranked using four different MCDM methods: the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje), and the PROMETHEE II (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) method. The best alternative rated according to three TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE is site (S2). The second-best alternative in the above three methods is site (S1), while the worst is site (S3). The best alternative rated according to AHP (S4) is in sixth position according to TOPSIS and in fifth position VIKOR and PROMETHEE. The comparison demonstrated that different MCDM techniques may generate different ranks. The simultaneous use of several MCDM methods in energy siting problems is considered advantageous as it can help decision makers to select the most sustainable sites, avoiding the disadvantages and availing the advantages of each method.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T04:13:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73f6ab08135e4c3591d807a4a1ae67d0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T04:13:06Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-73f6ab08135e4c3591d807a4a1ae67d02023-11-23T08:06:22ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-12-011424837110.3390/en14248371Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in GreeceDimitra G. Vagiona0Department of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceThis study investigated the prioritization and ranking problem of the appropriate locations at which to deploy solar photovoltaic (PV) farms. Although different Multicriteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods can be found in the literature to address this problem, a comparative analysis of those methods is missing. The aim of this study is to compare four different MCDM approaches to evaluate and rank suitable areas for the deployment of solar PV farms, with the island of Rhodes (Greece) being used as an example. Feasible areas for the location of such facilities were identified with the use of Geographical Information Systems (GIS), by applying certain exclusion criteria found either in the national legislative framework or in the international literature. Data were obtained from Greek open geospatial data. The feasible sites were evaluated and ranked using four different MCDM methods: the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje), and the PROMETHEE II (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations) method. The best alternative rated according to three TOPSIS, VIKOR and PROMETHEE is site (S2). The second-best alternative in the above three methods is site (S1), while the worst is site (S3). The best alternative rated according to AHP (S4) is in sixth position according to TOPSIS and in fifth position VIKOR and PROMETHEE. The comparison demonstrated that different MCDM techniques may generate different ranks. The simultaneous use of several MCDM methods in energy siting problems is considered advantageous as it can help decision makers to select the most sustainable sites, avoiding the disadvantages and availing the advantages of each method.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8371solar photovoltaic farmassessment criteriaAHPTOPSISVIKORPROMETHEE II
spellingShingle Dimitra G. Vagiona
Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece
Energies
solar photovoltaic farm
assessment criteria
AHP
TOPSIS
VIKOR
PROMETHEE II
title Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece
title_full Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece
title_fullStr Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece
title_short Comparative Multicriteria Analysis Methods for Ranking Sites for Solar Farm Deployment: A Case Study in Greece
title_sort comparative multicriteria analysis methods for ranking sites for solar farm deployment a case study in greece
topic solar photovoltaic farm
assessment criteria
AHP
TOPSIS
VIKOR
PROMETHEE II
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8371
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitragvagiona comparativemulticriteriaanalysismethodsforrankingsitesforsolarfarmdeploymentacasestudyingreece