Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experience

Aim : To assess the relation of acute rejection with respect to lymphocele incidence and determine the effect of lymphocele with graft survival. Methods : The paper is a singlecenter retrospective data review of renal transplant recipients from 1980 to 2007. A total of 1700 patients received kidne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muthu Veeramani, Sashikant Mishra, Abraham Kurien, Arvind Ganpule, Ravindra Sabnis, Mahesh Desai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2010;volume=26;issue=2;spage=193;epage=195;aulast=Veeramani
_version_ 1811276279082647552
author Muthu Veeramani
Sashikant Mishra
Abraham Kurien
Arvind Ganpule
Ravindra Sabnis
Mahesh Desai
author_facet Muthu Veeramani
Sashikant Mishra
Abraham Kurien
Arvind Ganpule
Ravindra Sabnis
Mahesh Desai
author_sort Muthu Veeramani
collection DOAJ
description Aim : To assess the relation of acute rejection with respect to lymphocele incidence and determine the effect of lymphocele with graft survival. Methods : The paper is a singlecenter retrospective data review of renal transplant recipients from 1980 to 2007. A total of 1700 patients received kidneys from live donation, and 9 patients received from cadaver donor. The standard transplant technique was performed in all. Lymphocele incidence, demography, relation to rejection episodes, type of immunosuppression, and management options were studied. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the role of rejection to lymphocele formation. Results : 47 (35 males and 12 females) patients had symptomatic lymphocele in the post-transplant period. 51% of the lymphocele patients had history of rejection as compared to overall rejection rate of 20% (P = 0.009). 4 (7.2%) had at least 1 rejection and 19 (40.4%) had more than one rejection episodes. All 47 patients required aspiration. Of the 14 patients who did not settle with a maximum of two aspirations underwent marsupilization (5 open and 9 laparoscopic). 1, 5, and 10 year graft survival of overall transplant recipient and post-transplant lymphocele patients was 86.54%, 82.41% and 76.36% vs. 86.44%, 81.2% and 68.14%, respectively. Conclusion : Acute rejection episodes were associated with statistically increased risk of lymphocele. There was no adverse outcome of graft with lymphocele formation after rejection episodes with respect to the overall graft survival.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:53:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-73fba5dac0f946b39b6f26bc433c7b1a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0970-1591
1998-3824
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:53:37Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Urology
spelling doaj.art-73fba5dac0f946b39b6f26bc433c7b1a2022-12-22T03:11:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Urology0970-15911998-38242010-01-0126219319510.4103/0970-1591.65385Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experienceMuthu VeeramaniSashikant MishraAbraham KurienArvind GanpuleRavindra SabnisMahesh DesaiAim : To assess the relation of acute rejection with respect to lymphocele incidence and determine the effect of lymphocele with graft survival. Methods : The paper is a singlecenter retrospective data review of renal transplant recipients from 1980 to 2007. A total of 1700 patients received kidneys from live donation, and 9 patients received from cadaver donor. The standard transplant technique was performed in all. Lymphocele incidence, demography, relation to rejection episodes, type of immunosuppression, and management options were studied. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the role of rejection to lymphocele formation. Results : 47 (35 males and 12 females) patients had symptomatic lymphocele in the post-transplant period. 51% of the lymphocele patients had history of rejection as compared to overall rejection rate of 20% (P = 0.009). 4 (7.2%) had at least 1 rejection and 19 (40.4%) had more than one rejection episodes. All 47 patients required aspiration. Of the 14 patients who did not settle with a maximum of two aspirations underwent marsupilization (5 open and 9 laparoscopic). 1, 5, and 10 year graft survival of overall transplant recipient and post-transplant lymphocele patients was 86.54%, 82.41% and 76.36% vs. 86.44%, 81.2% and 68.14%, respectively. Conclusion : Acute rejection episodes were associated with statistically increased risk of lymphocele. There was no adverse outcome of graft with lymphocele formation after rejection episodes with respect to the overall graft survival.http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2010;volume=26;issue=2;spage=193;epage=195;aulast=VeeramaniLymphocelerejectionrenal transplantation
spellingShingle Muthu Veeramani
Sashikant Mishra
Abraham Kurien
Arvind Ganpule
Ravindra Sabnis
Mahesh Desai
Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experience
Indian Journal of Urology
Lymphocele
rejection
renal transplantation
title Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experience
title_full Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experience
title_fullStr Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experience
title_full_unstemmed Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experience
title_short Does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation? A single centre experience
title_sort does rejection have a role in lymphocele formation post renal transplantation a single centre experience
topic Lymphocele
rejection
renal transplantation
url http://www.indianjurol.com/article.asp?issn=0970-1591;year=2010;volume=26;issue=2;spage=193;epage=195;aulast=Veeramani
work_keys_str_mv AT muthuveeramani doesrejectionhavearoleinlymphoceleformationpostrenaltransplantationasinglecentreexperience
AT sashikantmishra doesrejectionhavearoleinlymphoceleformationpostrenaltransplantationasinglecentreexperience
AT abrahamkurien doesrejectionhavearoleinlymphoceleformationpostrenaltransplantationasinglecentreexperience
AT arvindganpule doesrejectionhavearoleinlymphoceleformationpostrenaltransplantationasinglecentreexperience
AT ravindrasabnis doesrejectionhavearoleinlymphoceleformationpostrenaltransplantationasinglecentreexperience
AT maheshdesai doesrejectionhavearoleinlymphoceleformationpostrenaltransplantationasinglecentreexperience