Insertion of LMA Classic™ with and without digital intraoral manipulation in anesthetized unparalyzed patients
Background: The standard recommended insertion technique for LMA Classic™ requires the insertion of index finger into the oral cavity. Several anesthesiologists are reluctant to do this. We conducted this study to evaluate the modified technique of insertion of LMA Classic™ (not requiring insertion...
Main Authors: | Handattu M Krishna, Shyamsunder Kamath, Laxmi Shenoy |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.joacp.org/article.asp?issn=0970-9185;year=2012;volume=28;issue=4;spage=481;epage=485;aulast=Krishna |
Similar Items
-
Comparison of Clinical Performance of the LMA Classic with Disposable Soft Seal LMA in Spontaneously Breathing Patients for Elective Surgical Procedures
by: Dipasri Bhattacharya, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01) -
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of LMA Protector and LMA ProSeal in anaesthetised paralysed patients – A randomised controlled trial
by: Mamta Bhardwaj, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Comparison of gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM versus the conventional method in achieving oesophagal patency - A randomised comparative study
by: Sukhyanti Kerai, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Comparison of Ease and Success of Intubation through LMA Blockbuster and Ambu Aura-I in Patients Receiving General Anesthesia
by: Manisha Manohar, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients
by: Caren Candace Selvin, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)