Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study
BackgroundClinical reasoning (CR) is a fundamental skill for all medical students. In our medical education system, however, there are shortcomings in the conventional methods of teaching CR. New technology is needed to enhance our CR teaching, especially as we are facing an...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2021-11-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Serious Games |
| Online Access: | https://games.jmir.org/2021/4/e17670 |
| _version_ | 1827858885717786624 |
|---|---|
| author | Tianming Zuo Baozhi Sun Xu Guan Bin Zheng Bo Qu |
| author_facet | Tianming Zuo Baozhi Sun Xu Guan Bin Zheng Bo Qu |
| author_sort | Tianming Zuo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundClinical reasoning (CR) is a fundamental skill for all medical students. In our medical education system, however, there are shortcomings in the conventional methods of teaching CR. New technology is needed to enhance our CR teaching, especially as we are facing an influx of new health trainees. China Medical University (CMU), in response to this need, has developed a computer-based CR training system (CMU-CBCRT).
ObjectiveWe aimed to find evidence of construct validity of the CMU-CBCRT.
MethodsWe recruited 385 students from fifth year undergraduates to postgraduate year (PGY) 3 to complete the test on CMU-CBCRT. The known-groups technique was used to evaluate the construct validity of the CBCRT by comparing the test scores among 4 training levels (fifth year MD, PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3).
ResultsWe found that test scores increased with years of training. Significant differences were found in the test scores on information collection, diagnosis, and treatment and total scores among different training years of participants. However, significant results were not found for treatment errors.
ConclusionsWe provided evidence of construct validity of the CMU-CBCRT, which could determine the CR skills of medical students at varying early stage in their careers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:00:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-7416bb3a2dfe429e8aa1f58a72c61ecf |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2291-9279 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T13:00:29Z |
| publishDate | 2021-11-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Serious Games |
| spelling | doaj.art-7416bb3a2dfe429e8aa1f58a72c61ecf2023-08-28T19:44:36ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Serious Games2291-92792021-11-0194e1767010.2196/17670Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation StudyTianming Zuohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0577-1632Baozhi Sunhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7377-2982Xu Guanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3353-6261Bin Zhenghttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3476-5936Bo Quhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2526-9690 BackgroundClinical reasoning (CR) is a fundamental skill for all medical students. In our medical education system, however, there are shortcomings in the conventional methods of teaching CR. New technology is needed to enhance our CR teaching, especially as we are facing an influx of new health trainees. China Medical University (CMU), in response to this need, has developed a computer-based CR training system (CMU-CBCRT). ObjectiveWe aimed to find evidence of construct validity of the CMU-CBCRT. MethodsWe recruited 385 students from fifth year undergraduates to postgraduate year (PGY) 3 to complete the test on CMU-CBCRT. The known-groups technique was used to evaluate the construct validity of the CBCRT by comparing the test scores among 4 training levels (fifth year MD, PGY-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3). ResultsWe found that test scores increased with years of training. Significant differences were found in the test scores on information collection, diagnosis, and treatment and total scores among different training years of participants. However, significant results were not found for treatment errors. ConclusionsWe provided evidence of construct validity of the CMU-CBCRT, which could determine the CR skills of medical students at varying early stage in their careers.https://games.jmir.org/2021/4/e17670 |
| spellingShingle | Tianming Zuo Baozhi Sun Xu Guan Bin Zheng Bo Qu Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study JMIR Serious Games |
| title | Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study |
| title_full | Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study |
| title_fullStr | Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study |
| title_short | Evidence of Construct Validity of Computer-Based Tests for Clinical Reasoning: Instrument Validation Study |
| title_sort | evidence of construct validity of computer based tests for clinical reasoning instrument validation study |
| url | https://games.jmir.org/2021/4/e17670 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tianmingzuo evidenceofconstructvalidityofcomputerbasedtestsforclinicalreasoninginstrumentvalidationstudy AT baozhisun evidenceofconstructvalidityofcomputerbasedtestsforclinicalreasoninginstrumentvalidationstudy AT xuguan evidenceofconstructvalidityofcomputerbasedtestsforclinicalreasoninginstrumentvalidationstudy AT binzheng evidenceofconstructvalidityofcomputerbasedtestsforclinicalreasoninginstrumentvalidationstudy AT boqu evidenceofconstructvalidityofcomputerbasedtestsforclinicalreasoninginstrumentvalidationstudy |