OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspective
Decision science is a relatively new discipline: the product of a cross-pollination among mathematics, psychology, economy and a few other branches of knowledge. It studies how humans make their choices and purports to provide a “rational framework for choosing between alternative courses of action...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
2019-04-01
|
| Series: | Слово.ру: балтийский акцент |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/4213/12546/ |
| _version_ | 1818391297811021824 |
|---|---|
| author | Steiner P. |
| author_facet | Steiner P. |
| author_sort | Steiner P. |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Decision science is a relatively new discipline: the product of a cross-pollination among mathematics, psychology, economy and a few other branches of knowledge. It studies how humans make their choices and purports to provide a “rational framework for choosing between alternative courses of action when the consequences resulting from this choice are imperfectly known.” In and of itself decision science is a vast field of intersecting theories and methodologies that I will exploit only in a limited manner—as it applies to particular views on literary production. My paper deals with the theories of Viktor Shklovsky and Iurii Tynianov outlining how these two members of the Petersburg “Society for the Study of Poetic Language”(OPOIAZ) conceived of the writer as a rational agent pursuing a specific goal, and of the means at his/her disposal to attain it. Their approaches, I will illustrate, correspond well to two specific types of rationality: “instrumental” and “bounded.” To conclude, I will juxtapose the Formalists’ conceptualization of poetic creativity to Mikhail Bachtin’s view on the subject arguing that the way he conceives of the strategies available to the literary author fit the label of “interactive rationality.” |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T05:11:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-741d0a1edc334314ba1f0578fa50e826 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2225-5346 2686-8989 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T05:11:17Z |
| publishDate | 2019-04-01 |
| publisher | Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Слово.ру: балтийский акцент |
| spelling | doaj.art-741d0a1edc334314ba1f0578fa50e8262022-12-21T23:15:57ZengImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityСлово.ру: балтийский акцент2225-53462686-89892019-04-0110262510.5922/2225-5346-2019-2-1OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspectiveSteiner P. 0University of Pennsylvania Decision science is a relatively new discipline: the product of a cross-pollination among mathematics, psychology, economy and a few other branches of knowledge. It studies how humans make their choices and purports to provide a “rational framework for choosing between alternative courses of action when the consequences resulting from this choice are imperfectly known.” In and of itself decision science is a vast field of intersecting theories and methodologies that I will exploit only in a limited manner—as it applies to particular views on literary production. My paper deals with the theories of Viktor Shklovsky and Iurii Tynianov outlining how these two members of the Petersburg “Society for the Study of Poetic Language”(OPOIAZ) conceived of the writer as a rational agent pursuing a specific goal, and of the means at his/her disposal to attain it. Their approaches, I will illustrate, correspond well to two specific types of rationality: “instrumental” and “bounded.” To conclude, I will juxtapose the Formalists’ conceptualization of poetic creativity to Mikhail Bachtin’s view on the subject arguing that the way he conceives of the strategies available to the literary author fit the label of “interactive rationality.”https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/4213/12546/decision theorypoeticsinstrumentalboundedinteractive rationalityshklovkytynianovbakhtin |
| spellingShingle | Steiner P. OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspective Слово.ру: балтийский акцент decision theory poetics instrumental bounded interactive rationality shklovky tynianov bakhtin |
| title | OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspective |
| title_full | OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspective |
| title_fullStr | OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspective |
| title_short | OPOIAZ and Bakhtin: the Decision Science’s perspective |
| title_sort | opoiaz and bakhtin the decision science s perspective |
| topic | decision theory poetics instrumental bounded interactive rationality shklovky tynianov bakhtin |
| url | https://journals.kantiana.ru/slovo/4213/12546/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT steinerp opoiazandbakhtinthedecisionsciencesperspective |