Rethinking doctoral qualifying exams and candidacy in the physical sciences: Learning toward scientific legitimacy
There is growing awareness that established structures of higher education are often predicated on problematic assumptions about merit, excellence, and rigor. Doctoral qualifying exams, for example, are required to advance to candidacy in many Ph.D. programs despite decades of documented concerns ab...
Main Authors: | Román Liera, Aireale J. Rodgers, Lauren N. Irwin, Julie R. Posselt |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
American Physical Society
2023-08-01
|
Series: | Physical Review Physics Education Research |
Online Access: | http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020110 |
Similar Items
-
Innovations in qualifying exams: toward student-centered doctoral training
by: Adina O. Davidson, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Departmental case study of physics doctoral students’ perspectives of written qualifying exams
by: Shiva Basir, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
Multiwinner candidacy games
by: Obraztsova, S, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Career preferences of doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1993 compared with those of doctors qualifying in 1974, 1977, 1980, and 1983.
by: Lambert, T, et al.
Published: (1996) -
Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy
by: Paul Van de Heyning, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01)