Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background: Many patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were found to have a multivessel disease. Uncertainty still exists in the optimal revascularization strategy in AMI patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of immediate multivessel revascularization com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: En-Shao Liu, Cheng Chung Hung, Cheng-Hung Chiang, Chia-His Chang, Chin-Chang Cheng, Feng-You Kuo, Guang-Yuan Mar, Wei-Chun Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.639750/full
_version_ 1828144748559335424
author En-Shao Liu
Cheng Chung Hung
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Chia-His Chang
Chin-Chang Cheng
Feng-You Kuo
Guang-Yuan Mar
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
author_facet En-Shao Liu
Cheng Chung Hung
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Chia-His Chang
Chin-Chang Cheng
Feng-You Kuo
Guang-Yuan Mar
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
author_sort En-Shao Liu
collection DOAJ
description Background: Many patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were found to have a multivessel disease. Uncertainty still exists in the optimal revascularization strategy in AMI patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of immediate multivessel revascularization compared with staged multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with AMI.Method: This was a nationwide cohort study of 186,112 patients first diagnosed with AMI, 78,699 of whom received PCI for revascularization. Patients who received repetitive PCI during the index hospitalization were referred to as staged multivessel PCI. Immediate multivessel PCI was defined as patients with two-vessel PCI or three-vessel PCI during the index procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to evaluate the different indicators of mortality risks in AMI.Result: Immediate multivessel PCI was associated with a worse long-term outcome than staged multivessel PCI during the index admission (log-rank P < 0.001). There was a higher incidence of stroke in patients with multivessel PCI during hospitalization. In Cox analysis, immediate multivessel PCI was an independent risk factor for mortality compared to those with staged multivessel PCI, regardless of the type of myocardial infarction.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that performing immediate multivessel PCI for AMI may lead to worse long-term survival than staged multivessel PCI. Our findings emphasized the importance of PCI timing for non-infarct-related artery stenosis and provided information to supplement current evidence.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:21:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-744064d6e24644a19a32b11acf856dfe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:21:35Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-744064d6e24644a19a32b11acf856dfe2022-12-22T04:04:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2021-06-01810.3389/fcvm.2021.639750639750Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial InfarctionEn-Shao Liu0Cheng Chung Hung1Cheng-Hung Chiang2Cheng-Hung Chiang3Cheng-Hung Chiang4Chia-His Chang5Chin-Chang Cheng6Feng-You Kuo7Guang-Yuan Mar8Wei-Chun Huang9Wei-Chun Huang10Wei-Chun Huang11Wei-Chun Huang12Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanSchool of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanSchool of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Physical Therapy, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, TaiwanGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, TaiwanBackground: Many patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) were found to have a multivessel disease. Uncertainty still exists in the optimal revascularization strategy in AMI patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of immediate multivessel revascularization compared with staged multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with AMI.Method: This was a nationwide cohort study of 186,112 patients first diagnosed with AMI, 78,699 of whom received PCI for revascularization. Patients who received repetitive PCI during the index hospitalization were referred to as staged multivessel PCI. Immediate multivessel PCI was defined as patients with two-vessel PCI or three-vessel PCI during the index procedure. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to evaluate the different indicators of mortality risks in AMI.Result: Immediate multivessel PCI was associated with a worse long-term outcome than staged multivessel PCI during the index admission (log-rank P < 0.001). There was a higher incidence of stroke in patients with multivessel PCI during hospitalization. In Cox analysis, immediate multivessel PCI was an independent risk factor for mortality compared to those with staged multivessel PCI, regardless of the type of myocardial infarction.Conclusion: This study demonstrated that performing immediate multivessel PCI for AMI may lead to worse long-term survival than staged multivessel PCI. Our findings emphasized the importance of PCI timing for non-infarct-related artery stenosis and provided information to supplement current evidence.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.639750/fullacute myocardial infarctionmultivessel percutaneous coronary interventionnon-ST elevation myocardial infarctionnon-infarct-related arterypercutaneous coronary interventionST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
spellingShingle En-Shao Liu
Cheng Chung Hung
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Cheng-Hung Chiang
Chia-His Chang
Chin-Chang Cheng
Feng-You Kuo
Guang-Yuan Mar
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
Wei-Chun Huang
Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
acute myocardial infarction
multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention
non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
non-infarct-related artery
percutaneous coronary intervention
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
title Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_short Comparison of Different Timing of Multivessel Intervention During Index-Hospitalization for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
title_sort comparison of different timing of multivessel intervention during index hospitalization for patients with acute myocardial infarction
topic acute myocardial infarction
multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention
non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
non-infarct-related artery
percutaneous coronary intervention
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.639750/full
work_keys_str_mv AT enshaoliu comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT chengchunghung comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT chenghungchiang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT chenghungchiang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT chenghungchiang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT chiahischang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT chinchangcheng comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT fengyoukuo comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT guangyuanmar comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT weichunhuang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT weichunhuang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT weichunhuang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction
AT weichunhuang comparisonofdifferenttimingofmultivesselinterventionduringindexhospitalizationforpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarction