GENDER DIFFERENCES IN DISAGREEMENT STRATEGIES IN ORAL ACADEMIC DISCOURSE
The research aims to identify the gender differences in expressing disagreement in oral academic discourse. Examples containing explicit and implicit ways of expressing disagreement are collected through reading a corpus of texts chosen from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English (MICASE),...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Volgograd State University
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Seriâ 2. Âzykoznanie |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://l.jvolsu.com/index.php/en/archive-en/650-science-journal-of-volsu-linguistics-2020-vol-19-no-5/mainstream-issue/2105-achkasov-a-v-barsova-ya-v-gender-differences-in-disagreement-strategies-in-oral-academic-discouse |
| Summary: | The research aims to identify the gender differences in expressing disagreement in oral academic
discourse. Examples containing explicit and implicit ways of expressing disagreement are collected through reading
a corpus of texts chosen from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English (MICASE), including speech
genres of seminar, discussion, defense of the dissertation and colloquium. Our study confirmed previous
observations that utterances of explicit unmitigated disagreement or criticism are generally not typical of the
American academic environment. The research findings reveal that both men and women tend to express disagreement
explicitly using basic mitigation strategies. Unmitigated utterances with straightforward disagreement are infrequent
and used mainly by teachers, which is most likely due to the other sociolinguistic variables apart from gender, and
in particular by the status of speakers in teacher-student situations. Contrary to previous claims, men prefer the
tactics of down-toning, represented by language patterns with the meaning of problematic certainty and subjectivity,
as well as the use of lexical hedges. Female teachers recurrently use particular ways of implementing the tactics of
mitigating implicit expression of disagreement, which may be specific of their individual styles. The research
confirms that the distribution of particular language patterns across speakers should be taken into account when
studying the gender aspects of communication. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1998-9911 2409-1979 |