Personalized Law and Fundamental Rights

In recent years, scholars have focused increased attention on the idea of personalized law. It suggests the creation and enforcement of individualized legal norms based on the algorithmic processing of data in the similar manner companies personalize their services using Big Data tools. The article...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tembot Z. Misostishkhov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Цифровое право 2020-12-01
Series:Цифровое право
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/33
_version_ 1797661649308483584
author Tembot Z. Misostishkhov
author_facet Tembot Z. Misostishkhov
author_sort Tembot Z. Misostishkhov
collection DOAJ
description In recent years, scholars have focused increased attention on the idea of personalized law. It suggests the creation and enforcement of individualized legal norms based on the algorithmic processing of data in the similar manner companies personalize their services using Big Data tools. The article aims to define the role and position of personalized law and to evaluate the risks and consequences of personalization in the context of the emerging digital economy. The research analyses the theoretical grounds of personalized law and justifies its interpretation from the perspective of Hart’s legal positivism striking a balance between the sociological facticity of law and normativism. The study reveals the content, essential features of personalized law and defines its concept. The author analyses the correlation of personalized law with fundamental rights, thus evaluating the risks and consequences of personalization. Particularly, the errors of the approximation of a person’s actual will could occur as part of algorithmic decision-making thereby resulting in discrimination. It appears reasonable that at the beginning, algorithmic personalization should cover only those domains which have the minimal risk of the violation of fundamental norms and of intrusion into the field of social debates. The study underscores, that the transparency of the public sector and of the data-based algorithmic decision-making process is crucial in the context of personalized law, but nevertheless could debase its idea due to opportunistic practices. The issues identified during the research lead one to suggest that professionals who have both legal education and expertise in computer sciences would be in demand in the future. Such professionals could perform the role of independent experts and neutral authority monitoring compliance with data subject’s rights.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:48:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-746adda6b4ef444f839c932c5d9e0aca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2686-9136
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:48:40Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Цифровое право
record_format Article
series Цифровое право
spelling doaj.art-746adda6b4ef444f839c932c5d9e0aca2023-10-11T13:27:47ZengЦифровое правоЦифровое право2686-91362020-12-0114567310.38044/2686-9136-2020-1-4-56-7321Personalized Law and Fundamental RightsTembot Z. Misostishkhov0National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University)In recent years, scholars have focused increased attention on the idea of personalized law. It suggests the creation and enforcement of individualized legal norms based on the algorithmic processing of data in the similar manner companies personalize their services using Big Data tools. The article aims to define the role and position of personalized law and to evaluate the risks and consequences of personalization in the context of the emerging digital economy. The research analyses the theoretical grounds of personalized law and justifies its interpretation from the perspective of Hart’s legal positivism striking a balance between the sociological facticity of law and normativism. The study reveals the content, essential features of personalized law and defines its concept. The author analyses the correlation of personalized law with fundamental rights, thus evaluating the risks and consequences of personalization. Particularly, the errors of the approximation of a person’s actual will could occur as part of algorithmic decision-making thereby resulting in discrimination. It appears reasonable that at the beginning, algorithmic personalization should cover only those domains which have the minimal risk of the violation of fundamental norms and of intrusion into the field of social debates. The study underscores, that the transparency of the public sector and of the data-based algorithmic decision-making process is crucial in the context of personalized law, but nevertheless could debase its idea due to opportunistic practices. The issues identified during the research lead one to suggest that professionals who have both legal education and expertise in computer sciences would be in demand in the future. Such professionals could perform the role of independent experts and neutral authority monitoring compliance with data subject’s rights.https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/33automated decision makinghuman rightsbig datadigital economydata sharingpersonal datagranular legal normsdiscriminationcompliancepersonalized law
spellingShingle Tembot Z. Misostishkhov
Personalized Law and Fundamental Rights
Цифровое право
automated decision making
human rights
big data
digital economy
data sharing
personal data
granular legal norms
discrimination
compliance
personalized law
title Personalized Law and Fundamental Rights
title_full Personalized Law and Fundamental Rights
title_fullStr Personalized Law and Fundamental Rights
title_full_unstemmed Personalized Law and Fundamental Rights
title_short Personalized Law and Fundamental Rights
title_sort personalized law and fundamental rights
topic automated decision making
human rights
big data
digital economy
data sharing
personal data
granular legal norms
discrimination
compliance
personalized law
url https://www.digitallawjournal.org/jour/article/view/33
work_keys_str_mv AT tembotzmisostishkhov personalizedlawandfundamentalrights