A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria

During a participatory process in Gmunden, Austria, the organizational and responsibility-sharing arrangements for a landslide warning system proved to be contested issues. While questions on the warning system technology and the distribution of information, including the alarm for evacuation, could...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philipp Preuner, Anna Scolobig, JoAnne Linnerooth Bayer, David Ottowitz, Stefan Hoyer, Birgit Jochum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-10-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/54
_version_ 1811308016299933696
author Philipp Preuner
Anna Scolobig
JoAnne Linnerooth Bayer
David Ottowitz
Stefan Hoyer
Birgit Jochum
author_facet Philipp Preuner
Anna Scolobig
JoAnne Linnerooth Bayer
David Ottowitz
Stefan Hoyer
Birgit Jochum
author_sort Philipp Preuner
collection DOAJ
description During a participatory process in Gmunden, Austria, the organizational and responsibility-sharing arrangements for a landslide warning system proved to be contested issues. While questions on the warning system technology and the distribution of information, including the alarm for evacuation, could be resolved with the support of experts, controversies arose on the financial and legal responsibilities that ensure long-term and effective monitoring for the protection of the landslide-prone community. This paper examines how responsibilities can be shared among the residents, experts, and public authorities during the design and operation of landslide warning systems. In particular, we discuss the outcome and implications of three stakeholder workshops where participants deliberated on warning-system options that, in turn, were based on a discourse analysis of extensive stakeholder interviews. The results of the case study show that an end-user orientation requires the consideration of stakeholder worldviews, interests, and conflicts. Paradoxically, the public did not fully support their own involvement in the maintenance and control of the warning system, but the authorities promoted shared responsibility. Deliberative planning does not then necessarily lead to responsibility sharing, but it proved effective as a platform for information and for shared ownership in the warning system.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:15:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7476cff0f45f42aca9a6337c6973da63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9276
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:15:27Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Resources
spelling doaj.art-7476cff0f45f42aca9a6337c6973da632022-12-22T02:52:45ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762017-10-01645410.3390/resources6040054resources6040054A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper AustriaPhilipp Preuner0Anna Scolobig1JoAnne Linnerooth Bayer2David Ottowitz3Stefan Hoyer4Birgit Jochum5Risk and Resilience Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), 2361 Laxenburg, AustriaClimate Policy Group, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH Zurich), 8092 Zurich, SwitzerlandRisk and Resilience Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), 2361 Laxenburg, AustriaDepartment of Geophysics, Geological Survey of Austria (GSA), 1030 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Geophysics, Geological Survey of Austria (GSA), 1030 Vienna, AustriaDepartment of Geophysics, Geological Survey of Austria (GSA), 1030 Vienna, AustriaDuring a participatory process in Gmunden, Austria, the organizational and responsibility-sharing arrangements for a landslide warning system proved to be contested issues. While questions on the warning system technology and the distribution of information, including the alarm for evacuation, could be resolved with the support of experts, controversies arose on the financial and legal responsibilities that ensure long-term and effective monitoring for the protection of the landslide-prone community. This paper examines how responsibilities can be shared among the residents, experts, and public authorities during the design and operation of landslide warning systems. In particular, we discuss the outcome and implications of three stakeholder workshops where participants deliberated on warning-system options that, in turn, were based on a discourse analysis of extensive stakeholder interviews. The results of the case study show that an end-user orientation requires the consideration of stakeholder worldviews, interests, and conflicts. Paradoxically, the public did not fully support their own involvement in the maintenance and control of the warning system, but the authorities promoted shared responsibility. Deliberative planning does not then necessarily lead to responsibility sharing, but it proved effective as a platform for information and for shared ownership in the warning system.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/54warning systemlandslide risktechnical-policy optionresponsibility sharingpublic participationstakeholder perspectiveswarning communication and decision making
spellingShingle Philipp Preuner
Anna Scolobig
JoAnne Linnerooth Bayer
David Ottowitz
Stefan Hoyer
Birgit Jochum
A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria
Resources
warning system
landslide risk
technical-policy option
responsibility sharing
public participation
stakeholder perspectives
warning communication and decision making
title A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria
title_full A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria
title_fullStr A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria
title_full_unstemmed A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria
title_short A Participatory Process to Develop a Landslide Warning System: Paradoxes of Responsibility Sharing in a Case Study in Upper Austria
title_sort participatory process to develop a landslide warning system paradoxes of responsibility sharing in a case study in upper austria
topic warning system
landslide risk
technical-policy option
responsibility sharing
public participation
stakeholder perspectives
warning communication and decision making
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/6/4/54
work_keys_str_mv AT philipppreuner aparticipatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT annascolobig aparticipatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT joannelinneroothbayer aparticipatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT davidottowitz aparticipatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT stefanhoyer aparticipatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT birgitjochum aparticipatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT philipppreuner participatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT annascolobig participatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT joannelinneroothbayer participatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT davidottowitz participatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT stefanhoyer participatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria
AT birgitjochum participatoryprocesstodevelopalandslidewarningsystemparadoxesofresponsibilitysharinginacasestudyinupperaustria