Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.

Multisensory integration and recalibration are two processes by which perception deals with discrepant signals. Both are often studied in the spatial ventriloquism paradigm. There, integration is probed by the presentation of discrepant audio-visual stimuli, while recalibration manifests as an after...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christoph Kayser, Hame Park, Herbert Heuer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290461
_version_ 1797690864837853184
author Christoph Kayser
Hame Park
Herbert Heuer
author_facet Christoph Kayser
Hame Park
Herbert Heuer
author_sort Christoph Kayser
collection DOAJ
description Multisensory integration and recalibration are two processes by which perception deals with discrepant signals. Both are often studied in the spatial ventriloquism paradigm. There, integration is probed by the presentation of discrepant audio-visual stimuli, while recalibration manifests as an aftereffect in subsequent judgements of unisensory sounds. Both biases are typically quantified against the degree of audio-visual discrepancy, reflecting the possibility that both may arise from common underlying multisensory principles. We tested a specific prediction of this: that both processes should also scale similarly with the history of multisensory discrepancies, i.e. the sequence of discrepancies in several preceding audio-visual trials. Analyzing data from ten experiments with randomly varying spatial discrepancies we confirmed the expected dependency of each bias on the immediately presented discrepancy. And in line with the aftereffect being a cumulative process, this scaled with the discrepancies presented in at least three preceding audio-visual trials. However, the ventriloquism bias did not depend on this three-trial history of multisensory discrepancies and also did not depend on the aftereffect biases in previous trials - making these two multisensory processes experimentally dissociable. These findings support the notion that the ventriloquism bias and the aftereffect reflect distinct functions, with integration maintaining a stable percept by reducing immediate sensory discrepancies and recalibration maintaining an accurate percept by accounting for consistent discrepancies.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:05:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7485e246d15c43498e46295322872977
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:05:14Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-7485e246d15c43498e462953228729772023-09-07T05:31:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01188e029046110.1371/journal.pone.0290461Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.Christoph KayserHame ParkHerbert HeuerMultisensory integration and recalibration are two processes by which perception deals with discrepant signals. Both are often studied in the spatial ventriloquism paradigm. There, integration is probed by the presentation of discrepant audio-visual stimuli, while recalibration manifests as an aftereffect in subsequent judgements of unisensory sounds. Both biases are typically quantified against the degree of audio-visual discrepancy, reflecting the possibility that both may arise from common underlying multisensory principles. We tested a specific prediction of this: that both processes should also scale similarly with the history of multisensory discrepancies, i.e. the sequence of discrepancies in several preceding audio-visual trials. Analyzing data from ten experiments with randomly varying spatial discrepancies we confirmed the expected dependency of each bias on the immediately presented discrepancy. And in line with the aftereffect being a cumulative process, this scaled with the discrepancies presented in at least three preceding audio-visual trials. However, the ventriloquism bias did not depend on this three-trial history of multisensory discrepancies and also did not depend on the aftereffect biases in previous trials - making these two multisensory processes experimentally dissociable. These findings support the notion that the ventriloquism bias and the aftereffect reflect distinct functions, with integration maintaining a stable percept by reducing immediate sensory discrepancies and recalibration maintaining an accurate percept by accounting for consistent discrepancies.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290461
spellingShingle Christoph Kayser
Hame Park
Herbert Heuer
Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.
PLoS ONE
title Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.
title_full Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.
title_fullStr Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.
title_full_unstemmed Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.
title_short Cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias.
title_sort cumulative multisensory discrepancies shape the ventriloquism aftereffect but not the ventriloquism bias
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290461
work_keys_str_mv AT christophkayser cumulativemultisensorydiscrepanciesshapetheventriloquismaftereffectbutnottheventriloquismbias
AT hamepark cumulativemultisensorydiscrepanciesshapetheventriloquismaftereffectbutnottheventriloquismbias
AT herbertheuer cumulativemultisensorydiscrepanciesshapetheventriloquismaftereffectbutnottheventriloquismbias