Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of surgical methods for treating patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Material and Methods. The sample consisted of 160 patients operated on in 2014–2019 for recurrent lumbar disc herniation by percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (Group 1), microsur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maksim N. Kravtsov, Ivan A. Kruglov, Saidmirze Dz. Mirzametov, Aleksandr S. Seleznev, Nina Petrovna Alekseyeva, Vadim A. Manukovskiy, Boris V. Gaidar, Dmitry V. Svistov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan" 2021-03-01
Series:Хирургия позвоночника
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1800/1796
_version_ 1797705259916722176
author Maksim N. Kravtsov
Ivan A. Kruglov
Saidmirze Dz. Mirzametov
Aleksandr S. Seleznev
Nina Petrovna Alekseyeva
Vadim A. Manukovskiy
Boris V. Gaidar
Dmitry V. Svistov
author_facet Maksim N. Kravtsov
Ivan A. Kruglov
Saidmirze Dz. Mirzametov
Aleksandr S. Seleznev
Nina Petrovna Alekseyeva
Vadim A. Manukovskiy
Boris V. Gaidar
Dmitry V. Svistov
author_sort Maksim N. Kravtsov
collection DOAJ
description Objective. To compare the effectiveness of surgical methods for treating patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Material and Methods. The sample consisted of 160 patients operated on in 2014–2019 for recurrent lumbar disc herniation by percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (Group 1), microsurgical discectomy (Group 2), single-level transforaminal interbody fusion (Group 3) and single-level total intervertebral disc replacement (Group 4). The effectiveness of surgical treatment was evaluated using the NRS-11, ODI, and MacNab questionnaires. Results. Assessment of the pain syndrome severity and the vital activity level of patients revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences in favor of total intervertebral disc replacement. Excellent and good outcomes after arthroplasty according to MacNab criteria were noted in all patients in this group. Similar outcomes were reported in 77.5 % (31/40) of patients in the TLIF group, in 75.1 % (24/32) of patients in the percutaneous endoscopic discectomy group and in 72.6 % (45/62) of patients in the microdiscectomy group. The operation time and length of hospital stay were shorter in the endoscopic and microsurgical discectomy groups (p < 0.001). However, the lower incidence of complications and reoperations was observed in groups of posterior interbody fusion and arthroplasty (p > 0.05). Conclusion. Arthroplasty with the M6-L implant expands the possibilities of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Total intervertebral disc replacement and posterior interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disc herniation are more effective in comparison with decompressive operations, which is reflected in the improvement of clinical treatment outcomes, reduction of perioperative complications and frequency of repeated interventions.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:33:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-7494152c8aa34121b0f4f5a0d72536d5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1810-8997
2313-1497
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:33:29Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"
record_format Article
series Хирургия позвоночника
spelling doaj.art-7494152c8aa34121b0f4f5a0d72536d52023-09-03T06:37:18ZengMinistry of Health of Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution "Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan"Хирургия позвоночника1810-89972313-14972021-03-01182344310.14531/ss2021.2.34-43Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective studyMaksim N. Kravtsov0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2486-6995Ivan A. Kruglov1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0569-2291Saidmirze Dz. Mirzametov2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-7546Aleksandr S. Seleznev3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-5576Nina Petrovna Alekseyeva4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8837-6739Vadim A. Manukovskiy5https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0319-814XBoris V. Gaidar6https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2430-1927Dmitry V. Svistov7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-9887S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russia; North-Western State University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov, St. Petersburg, Russia1586 Military Clinical Hospital, Podolsk, Moscow region, RussiaS.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russia 1586 Military Clinical Hospital, Podolsk, Moscow region, RussiaSt. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia; Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, St. Petersburg, RussiaSt. Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, St. Petersburg, Russia; North-Western State University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov, St. Petersburg, RussiaS.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, RussiaS.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, RussiaObjective. To compare the effectiveness of surgical methods for treating patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Material and Methods. The sample consisted of 160 patients operated on in 2014–2019 for recurrent lumbar disc herniation by percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (Group 1), microsurgical discectomy (Group 2), single-level transforaminal interbody fusion (Group 3) and single-level total intervertebral disc replacement (Group 4). The effectiveness of surgical treatment was evaluated using the NRS-11, ODI, and MacNab questionnaires. Results. Assessment of the pain syndrome severity and the vital activity level of patients revealed significant (p < 0.05) differences in favor of total intervertebral disc replacement. Excellent and good outcomes after arthroplasty according to MacNab criteria were noted in all patients in this group. Similar outcomes were reported in 77.5 % (31/40) of patients in the TLIF group, in 75.1 % (24/32) of patients in the percutaneous endoscopic discectomy group and in 72.6 % (45/62) of patients in the microdiscectomy group. The operation time and length of hospital stay were shorter in the endoscopic and microsurgical discectomy groups (p < 0.001). However, the lower incidence of complications and reoperations was observed in groups of posterior interbody fusion and arthroplasty (p > 0.05). Conclusion. Arthroplasty with the M6-L implant expands the possibilities of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Total intervertebral disc replacement and posterior interbody fusion for recurrent lumbar disc herniation are more effective in comparison with decompressive operations, which is reflected in the improvement of clinical treatment outcomes, reduction of perioperative complications and frequency of repeated interventions.https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1800/1796recurrent lumbar disc herniationfull-endoscopic lumbar discectomymicrodiscectomytransforaminal lumbar interbody fusiontotal disc replacementarthroplasty
spellingShingle Maksim N. Kravtsov
Ivan A. Kruglov
Saidmirze Dz. Mirzametov
Aleksandr S. Seleznev
Nina Petrovna Alekseyeva
Vadim A. Manukovskiy
Boris V. Gaidar
Dmitry V. Svistov
Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study
Хирургия позвоночника
recurrent lumbar disc herniation
full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy
microdiscectomy
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
total disc replacement
arthroplasty
title Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study
title_full Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study
title_short Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation: a cohort retrospective study
title_sort evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical methods for the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation a cohort retrospective study
topic recurrent lumbar disc herniation
full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy
microdiscectomy
transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
total disc replacement
arthroplasty
url https://www.spinesurgery.ru/jour/article/view/1800/1796
work_keys_str_mv AT maksimnkravtsov evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy
AT ivanakruglov evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy
AT saidmirzedzmirzametov evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy
AT aleksandrsseleznev evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy
AT ninapetrovnaalekseyeva evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy
AT vadimamanukovskiy evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy
AT borisvgaidar evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy
AT dmitryvsvistov evaluationoftheeffectivenessofsurgicalmethodsforthetreatmentofrecurrentlumbardischerniationacohortretrospectivestudy