The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in Romania
In this paper I argue that sociology was a key discipline in producing relevant knowledge for managing and reimagining the socialist economic development in Romania. It played a central role in placing economic development at the subnational level, since much of the everyday economics unfolded at th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Sciendo
2017-06-01
|
| Series: | Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2017-0004 |
| _version_ | 1811231208203354112 |
|---|---|
| author | Petrovici Norbert |
| author_facet | Petrovici Norbert |
| author_sort | Petrovici Norbert |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this paper I argue that sociology was a key discipline in producing relevant knowledge for managing and reimagining the socialist economic development in Romania. It played a central role in placing economic development at the subnational level, since much of the everyday economics unfolded at the level of the regions, which formed around the emerging cities. I analyse the birth of the ‘urban area’, an academic concept and a policy tool, as it was developed by Miron Constantinescu and his associate Henry H. Stahl. This was the main device that shifted economic growth to the subnational level and allowed the planners to regulate the economy as a set of inter-connected production chains. Sociology was disbanded as an academic discipline in 1948; nonetheless, through the figure of Miron Constantinescu, a key member of the Political Bureau between 1945-1957, it remained a central producer of knowledge through complex institutional arrangements, put in place in the 1950s. These institutions employed sociological figures from the inter-war sociological establishment. Their methodological skills and theoretical endeavours were put to work in applied research. I argue that some strategic developmentalist policies in socialist Romania were strongly shaped by the reworking in Marxist terms of certain key ideas of the Gustian school of a ‘sociology of the nation’. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T10:41:26Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-74a9900aed9e4234b8c70f459c6e58c0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2066-0464 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T10:41:26Z |
| publishDate | 2017-06-01 |
| publisher | Sciendo |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia |
| spelling | doaj.art-74a9900aed9e4234b8c70f459c6e58c02022-12-22T03:36:35ZengSciendoStudia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia2066-04642017-06-01621376410.1515/subbs-2017-0004subbs-2017-0004The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in RomaniaPetrovici Norbert0Babeș-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, RomaniaIn this paper I argue that sociology was a key discipline in producing relevant knowledge for managing and reimagining the socialist economic development in Romania. It played a central role in placing economic development at the subnational level, since much of the everyday economics unfolded at the level of the regions, which formed around the emerging cities. I analyse the birth of the ‘urban area’, an academic concept and a policy tool, as it was developed by Miron Constantinescu and his associate Henry H. Stahl. This was the main device that shifted economic growth to the subnational level and allowed the planners to regulate the economy as a set of inter-connected production chains. Sociology was disbanded as an academic discipline in 1948; nonetheless, through the figure of Miron Constantinescu, a key member of the Political Bureau between 1945-1957, it remained a central producer of knowledge through complex institutional arrangements, put in place in the 1950s. These institutions employed sociological figures from the inter-war sociological establishment. Their methodological skills and theoretical endeavours were put to work in applied research. I argue that some strategic developmentalist policies in socialist Romania were strongly shaped by the reworking in Marxist terms of certain key ideas of the Gustian school of a ‘sociology of the nation’.https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2017-0004urban zonessocialismurban policydevelopmentalismthe sociology of sociology |
| spellingShingle | Petrovici Norbert The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in Romania Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Sociologia urban zones socialism urban policy developmentalism the sociology of sociology |
| title | The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in Romania |
| title_full | The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in Romania |
| title_fullStr | The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in Romania |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in Romania |
| title_short | The Politics of Mobilizing Local Resources for Growth: ‘Urban Areas’ in Romania |
| title_sort | politics of mobilizing local resources for growth urban areas in romania |
| topic | urban zones socialism urban policy developmentalism the sociology of sociology |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/subbs-2017-0004 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT petrovicinorbert thepoliticsofmobilizinglocalresourcesforgrowthurbanareasinromania AT petrovicinorbert politicsofmobilizinglocalresourcesforgrowthurbanareasinromania |