Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Objective: To determine discordance in the diagnosis of osteoporosis among postmenopausal Indian women using hip and spine Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Materials and Methods: The study included postmenopausal women who underwent bone mineral densitometry (BMD) for suspected osteoporosis at a re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meeta Singh, Navneet Magon, Tanvir Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Journal of Mid-Life Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmidlifehealth.org/article.asp?issn=0976-7800;year=2012;volume=3;issue=2;spage=76;epage=80;aulast=Singh
_version_ 1828965621903130624
author Meeta Singh
Navneet Magon
Tanvir Singh
author_facet Meeta Singh
Navneet Magon
Tanvir Singh
author_sort Meeta Singh
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To determine discordance in the diagnosis of osteoporosis among postmenopausal Indian women using hip and spine Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Materials and Methods: The study included postmenopausal women who underwent bone mineral densitometry (BMD) for suspected osteoporosis at a referral hospital at Hyderabad, India. The BMD measures at the hip and spine were used to derive T-scores and to determine the prevalence of discordance. Factors potentially associated with discordance were explored in univariate and a multivariate regression model. Results: The mean age of the 348 postmenopausal women in the study was 53.62 ± 8.94 years (median 53.00 years, range 27.00 to 84.00 years). Major discordance was seen in 16.67% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 12.73, 20.60) of the study population and minor discordance in 34.48% (95% CI: 29.46, 39.50%) of the study population. Age >50 years (adjusted odds ratios [OR]: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.24, 5.46, P value = 0.01), premature menopause (adjusted OR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.27, 6.81, P value = 0.03), and multiple pregnancies (adjusted OR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.28, 5.41, P value = 0.008) were found to be significantly associated with major discordance. Conclusions: The large prevalence of discordance may reflect the differences in osteoporosis in different populations and suggests the need to redefine ranges and risk factors used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in India.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T11:14:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-74b58e464d5949db9d901806e847b761
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0976-7800
0976-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T11:14:22Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Mid-Life Health
spelling doaj.art-74b58e464d5949db9d901806e847b7612022-12-21T23:04:06ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Mid-Life Health0976-78000976-78192012-01-0132768010.4103/0976-7800.104457Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryMeeta SinghNavneet MagonTanvir SinghObjective: To determine discordance in the diagnosis of osteoporosis among postmenopausal Indian women using hip and spine Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry. Materials and Methods: The study included postmenopausal women who underwent bone mineral densitometry (BMD) for suspected osteoporosis at a referral hospital at Hyderabad, India. The BMD measures at the hip and spine were used to derive T-scores and to determine the prevalence of discordance. Factors potentially associated with discordance were explored in univariate and a multivariate regression model. Results: The mean age of the 348 postmenopausal women in the study was 53.62 ± 8.94 years (median 53.00 years, range 27.00 to 84.00 years). Major discordance was seen in 16.67% (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 12.73, 20.60) of the study population and minor discordance in 34.48% (95% CI: 29.46, 39.50%) of the study population. Age >50 years (adjusted odds ratios [OR]: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.24, 5.46, P value = 0.01), premature menopause (adjusted OR: 2.94, 95% CI: 1.27, 6.81, P value = 0.03), and multiple pregnancies (adjusted OR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.28, 5.41, P value = 0.008) were found to be significantly associated with major discordance. Conclusions: The large prevalence of discordance may reflect the differences in osteoporosis in different populations and suggests the need to redefine ranges and risk factors used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis in India.http://www.jmidlifehealth.org/article.asp?issn=0976-7800;year=2012;volume=3;issue=2;spage=76;epage=80;aulast=SinghBone mineral densitydiscordancedual-energy X-ray absorptiometryosteoporosis
spellingShingle Meeta Singh
Navneet Magon
Tanvir Singh
Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Journal of Mid-Life Health
Bone mineral density
discordance
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
osteoporosis
title Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_full Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_fullStr Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_full_unstemmed Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_short Major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among Indian women using hip and spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
title_sort major and minor discordance in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis among indian women using hip and spine dual energy x ray absorptiometry
topic Bone mineral density
discordance
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
osteoporosis
url http://www.jmidlifehealth.org/article.asp?issn=0976-7800;year=2012;volume=3;issue=2;spage=76;epage=80;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT meetasingh majorandminordiscordanceinthediagnosisofpostmenopausalosteoporosisamongindianwomenusinghipandspinedualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT navneetmagon majorandminordiscordanceinthediagnosisofpostmenopausalosteoporosisamongindianwomenusinghipandspinedualenergyxrayabsorptiometry
AT tanvirsingh majorandminordiscordanceinthediagnosisofpostmenopausalosteoporosisamongindianwomenusinghipandspinedualenergyxrayabsorptiometry