Usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract The effects of lower tidal volume ventilation (LTV) were controversial for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the use of LTV strategy in patients with ARDS. We performed a literature search on MEDLINE, CENTRAL...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ryohei Yamamoto, Satoru Robert Okazaki, Yoshihito Fujita, Nozomu Seki, Yoshufumi Kokei, Shusuke Sekine, Soichiro Wada, Yasuhiro Norisue, Chihiro Narita
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13224-y
_version_ 1817971045962874880
author Ryohei Yamamoto
Satoru Robert Okazaki
Yoshihito Fujita
Nozomu Seki
Yoshufumi Kokei
Shusuke Sekine
Soichiro Wada
Yasuhiro Norisue
Chihiro Narita
author_facet Ryohei Yamamoto
Satoru Robert Okazaki
Yoshihito Fujita
Nozomu Seki
Yoshufumi Kokei
Shusuke Sekine
Soichiro Wada
Yasuhiro Norisue
Chihiro Narita
author_sort Ryohei Yamamoto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The effects of lower tidal volume ventilation (LTV) were controversial for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the use of LTV strategy in patients with ARDS. We performed a literature search on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, “Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi”, clinical trial registration sites, and the reference of recent guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the LTV strategy with the higher tidal volume ventilation (HTV) strategy in patients with ARDS. Two authors independently evaluated the eligibility of studies and extracted the data. The primary outcomes were 28-day mortality. We used the GRADE methodology to assess the certainty of evidence. Among the 19,864 records screened, 13 RCTs that recruited 1874 patients were included in our meta-analysis. When comparing LTV (4–8 ml/kg) versus HTV (> 8 ml/kg), the pooled risk ratio for 28-day mortality was 0.79 (11 studies, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.94, I2 = 43%, n = 1795, moderate certainty of evidence). Subgroup-analysis by combined high positive end-expiratory pressure with LTV showed interaction (P = 0.01). Our study indicated that ventilation with LTV was associated with reduced risk of mortality in patients with ARDS when compared with HTV. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000041071).
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:41:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-74b5933a4c4a4f92a73ed96e47ce6da5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:41:50Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-74b5933a4c4a4f92a73ed96e47ce6da52022-12-22T02:30:50ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-06-0112111210.1038/s41598-022-13224-yUsefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysisRyohei Yamamoto0Satoru Robert Okazaki1Yoshihito Fujita2Nozomu Seki3Yoshufumi Kokei4Shusuke Sekine5Soichiro Wada6Yasuhiro Norisue7Chihiro Narita8Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Kameda Medical CenterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Aichi Medical UniversityEmergency Department, Toyama University HospitalDepartment of Emergency Medicine Trauma and Resuscitation Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical CenterDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tokyo Medical UniversityDepartment of Pediatrics, Teine Keijinkai HospitalDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical CenterDepartmenet of Emergency Medicine, Shizuoka General HospitalAbstract The effects of lower tidal volume ventilation (LTV) were controversial for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the use of LTV strategy in patients with ARDS. We performed a literature search on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, “Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi”, clinical trial registration sites, and the reference of recent guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the LTV strategy with the higher tidal volume ventilation (HTV) strategy in patients with ARDS. Two authors independently evaluated the eligibility of studies and extracted the data. The primary outcomes were 28-day mortality. We used the GRADE methodology to assess the certainty of evidence. Among the 19,864 records screened, 13 RCTs that recruited 1874 patients were included in our meta-analysis. When comparing LTV (4–8 ml/kg) versus HTV (> 8 ml/kg), the pooled risk ratio for 28-day mortality was 0.79 (11 studies, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.94, I2 = 43%, n = 1795, moderate certainty of evidence). Subgroup-analysis by combined high positive end-expiratory pressure with LTV showed interaction (P = 0.01). Our study indicated that ventilation with LTV was associated with reduced risk of mortality in patients with ARDS when compared with HTV. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR (UMIN000041071).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13224-y
spellingShingle Ryohei Yamamoto
Satoru Robert Okazaki
Yoshihito Fujita
Nozomu Seki
Yoshufumi Kokei
Shusuke Sekine
Soichiro Wada
Yasuhiro Norisue
Chihiro Narita
Usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Scientific Reports
title Usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort usefulness of low tidal volume ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome a systematic review and meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13224-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ryoheiyamamoto usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT satorurobertokazaki usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshihitofujita usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nozomuseki usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yoshufumikokei usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shusukesekine usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT soichirowada usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yasuhironorisue usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chihironarita usefulnessoflowtidalvolumeventilationstrategyforpatientswithacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis