Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Progress in vitrification techniques has allowed reproductive physicians to consider new strategies for using progestin as an alternative to a GnRH analogue to improve in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, the role of progestin in blocking luteinising hormone (LH) surges and its...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yun Wang, Yanping Kuang, Qiuju Chen, Renfei Cai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-08-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2850-x
_version_ 1818331143620001792
author Yun Wang
Yanping Kuang
Qiuju Chen
Renfei Cai
author_facet Yun Wang
Yanping Kuang
Qiuju Chen
Renfei Cai
author_sort Yun Wang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Progress in vitrification techniques has allowed reproductive physicians to consider new strategies for using progestin as an alternative to a GnRH analogue to improve in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, the role of progestin in blocking luteinising hormone (LH) surges and its potential in clinical practice are unclear, especially for poor responders. We designed a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and progestin in blocking LH surges and premature ovulation in poor responders. Methods/design Poor responders who meet the Bologna criteria will be randomised to one of two stimulation regimens—gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS)—using a computer-generated random number. Fresh embryos were transferred in the GnRH antagonist group and frozen embryos were transferred in the PPOS group. The primary outcome is the incidence of premature LH surges. Secondary outcomes include the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of embryos available for transfer, implantation rates and clinical pregnancy. The sample size for this trial is estimated as 340 participants, with 170 participants in each group. The data analysis will be by intention to treat. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first RCT to examine the efficacy of administering progestin orally to block LH surges and premature ovulation compared with the GnRH antagonist protocols in poor responders undergoing IVF treatment. Trial registration www.chictr.org.cn. ChiCTR-IPR-17010906. Registered on 18 March 2017.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T13:15:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-74d66e3c9b934d5f81aea1b00703501b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T13:15:10Z
publishDate 2018-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-74d66e3c9b934d5f81aea1b00703501b2022-12-21T23:44:33ZengBMCTrials1745-62152018-08-011911610.1186/s13063-018-2850-xGonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trialYun Wang0Yanping Kuang1Qiuju Chen2Renfei Cai3Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineDepartment of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineAbstract Background Progress in vitrification techniques has allowed reproductive physicians to consider new strategies for using progestin as an alternative to a GnRH analogue to improve in vitro fertilisation (IVF). However, the role of progestin in blocking luteinising hormone (LH) surges and its potential in clinical practice are unclear, especially for poor responders. We designed a prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare the efficacy of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and progestin in blocking LH surges and premature ovulation in poor responders. Methods/design Poor responders who meet the Bologna criteria will be randomised to one of two stimulation regimens—gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS)—using a computer-generated random number. Fresh embryos were transferred in the GnRH antagonist group and frozen embryos were transferred in the PPOS group. The primary outcome is the incidence of premature LH surges. Secondary outcomes include the number of oocytes retrieved, the number of embryos available for transfer, implantation rates and clinical pregnancy. The sample size for this trial is estimated as 340 participants, with 170 participants in each group. The data analysis will be by intention to treat. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first RCT to examine the efficacy of administering progestin orally to block LH surges and premature ovulation compared with the GnRH antagonist protocols in poor responders undergoing IVF treatment. Trial registration www.chictr.org.cn. ChiCTR-IPR-17010906. Registered on 18 March 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2850-xGnRH antagonistProgestinPoor respondersLH surge
spellingShingle Yun Wang
Yanping Kuang
Qiuju Chen
Renfei Cai
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Trials
GnRH antagonist
Progestin
Poor responders
LH surge
title Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist versus progestin for the prevention of premature luteinising hormone surges in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic GnRH antagonist
Progestin
Poor responders
LH surge
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2850-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yunwang gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT yanpingkuang gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT qiujuchen gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT renfeicai gonadotropinreleasinghormoneantagonistversusprogestinforthepreventionofprematureluteinisinghormonesurgesinpoorrespondersundergoinginvitrofertilisationtreatmentstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial