Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review
Abstract Background In regard to health service planning and delivery, the use of information at different levels in the health system is vital, ranging from the influencing of policy to the programming of action to the ensuring of evidence-informed practices. However, neither ownership of, nor acce...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2022-10-01
|
| Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08598-8 |
| _version_ | 1811194982179012608 |
|---|---|
| author | Elaine Byrne Johan Ivar Sæbø |
| author_facet | Elaine Byrne Johan Ivar Sæbø |
| author_sort | Elaine Byrne |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Background In regard to health service planning and delivery, the use of information at different levels in the health system is vital, ranging from the influencing of policy to the programming of action to the ensuring of evidence-informed practices. However, neither ownership of, nor access to, good quality data guarantees actual use of these data. For information to be used, relevant data need to be collected, processed and analysed in an accessible format. This problem of underused data, and indeed the absence of data use entirely, is widespread and has been evident for decades. The DHIS2 software platform supports routine health management for an estimated 2.4 billion people, in over 70 countries worldwide. It is by far the largest and most widespread software for this purpose and adopts a holistic, socio-technical approach to development and implementation. Given this approach, and the rapid and extensive scaling of DHIS2, we questioned whether or not there has been a parallel increase in the scaling of improved information use. To date, there has been no rigorous review of the documentation on how exactly DHIS2 data is routinely being used for decision-making and subsequent programming of action. This scoping review addresses this review gap. Methods The five-stage approach of Arksey and O’Malley progressed by Levac et al. and Peters was followed. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) were searched, along with relevant conference proceedings and postgraduate theses. In total, over 500 documents were reviewed and data from 19 documents were extracted. Results Overall, DHIS2 data are being used but there are few detailed descriptions of this usage in peer reviewed or grey literature. We find that, commonly, there exists a centralised versus decentralised pattern of use in terms of access to data and the reporting of data ‘up’ in the system. We also find that the different conceptualisations of data use and how data use is conceptualised are not made explicit. Conclusions We conclude with some suggestions for a way forward, namely: i) the need to document in more detail and share how data are being used, ii) the need to investigate how data were created and who uses such data, iii) the need to design systems based on work practices, and in tandem develop and promote forums in which ‘conversations’ around data can take place. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:35:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-74deda909b804bad9f1bf3571e6a3a7b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1472-6963 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-12T00:35:17Z |
| publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | BMC Health Services Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-74deda909b804bad9f1bf3571e6a3a7b2022-12-22T03:55:10ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632022-10-0122111610.1186/s12913-022-08598-8Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping reviewElaine Byrne0Johan Ivar Sæbø1HISP Centre and Department of Informatics, University of OsloHISP Centre and Department of Informatics, University of OsloAbstract Background In regard to health service planning and delivery, the use of information at different levels in the health system is vital, ranging from the influencing of policy to the programming of action to the ensuring of evidence-informed practices. However, neither ownership of, nor access to, good quality data guarantees actual use of these data. For information to be used, relevant data need to be collected, processed and analysed in an accessible format. This problem of underused data, and indeed the absence of data use entirely, is widespread and has been evident for decades. The DHIS2 software platform supports routine health management for an estimated 2.4 billion people, in over 70 countries worldwide. It is by far the largest and most widespread software for this purpose and adopts a holistic, socio-technical approach to development and implementation. Given this approach, and the rapid and extensive scaling of DHIS2, we questioned whether or not there has been a parallel increase in the scaling of improved information use. To date, there has been no rigorous review of the documentation on how exactly DHIS2 data is routinely being used for decision-making and subsequent programming of action. This scoping review addresses this review gap. Methods The five-stage approach of Arksey and O’Malley progressed by Levac et al. and Peters was followed. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) were searched, along with relevant conference proceedings and postgraduate theses. In total, over 500 documents were reviewed and data from 19 documents were extracted. Results Overall, DHIS2 data are being used but there are few detailed descriptions of this usage in peer reviewed or grey literature. We find that, commonly, there exists a centralised versus decentralised pattern of use in terms of access to data and the reporting of data ‘up’ in the system. We also find that the different conceptualisations of data use and how data use is conceptualised are not made explicit. Conclusions We conclude with some suggestions for a way forward, namely: i) the need to document in more detail and share how data are being used, ii) the need to investigate how data were created and who uses such data, iii) the need to design systems based on work practices, and in tandem develop and promote forums in which ‘conversations’ around data can take place.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08598-8Routine data useDHIS2Scoping reviewHealth information system |
| spellingShingle | Elaine Byrne Johan Ivar Sæbø Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review BMC Health Services Research Routine data use DHIS2 Scoping review Health information system |
| title | Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review |
| title_full | Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review |
| title_fullStr | Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review |
| title_short | Routine use of DHIS2 data: a scoping review |
| title_sort | routine use of dhis2 data a scoping review |
| topic | Routine data use DHIS2 Scoping review Health information system |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08598-8 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elainebyrne routineuseofdhis2dataascopingreview AT johanivarsæbø routineuseofdhis2dataascopingreview |